Development and validation of the World Health Organization disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Indonesian version in stroke survivors

References

• The top 10 causes of death; 2021. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/
   Google Scholar
• Indonesia; 2021. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/indonesia
   Google Scholar
• Kim JS. Post-stroke mood and emotional disturbances: pharmacological therapy based on mechanisms. J Stroke. 2016;18(3):244–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LJ, Yao XM, Guan BY, et al. Persistent depression is a predictor of quality of life in stroke survivors: results from a 5-year follow-up study of a Chinese cohort. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(18):2206–2212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Shi YZ, Zhang N, et al. The disability rate of 5-year post-stroke and its correlation factors: a national survey in China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, et al. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1091–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ding X, Dong B. The measurement of disability in the elderly: a systematic review of self-reported questionnaires. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):150.e1–150.e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, et al. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan Kunt D, Dereboy F. Validity and reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls. Turk J Psychiatry. 2018;29(4):248–257.
   Google Scholar
• Koumpouros Y, Papageorgiou E, Sakellari E, et al. Adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation of the Greek version of WHODAS 2.0 pilot application in Greek elderly population. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method. 2018;18(1):63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro SS, Leite CF, Baldin JE, et al. Validation of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 in patients on hemodialysis therapy. Fisioter Mov. 2018;31:e003130.
   Google Scholar
• Silva C, Coleta I, Silva AG, et al. Adaptation and validation of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013;47(4):752–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Razi E, Sehat M, et al. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II-12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients. Injury. 2016;47(5):1104–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung MK, Hung AT, Poon PK, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu TY, Finger ME, Fellinghauer CS, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in adults with spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(6):516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu T-Y, Yen C-F, Chou C-H, et al. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2812–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira C, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC, et al. Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017;39(2):44–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Disability and Health; 2021. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/
   Google Scholar
• Meesters JJ, Verhoef J, Liem IS, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II to assess disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(2):326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich M, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(11):855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Quittner AL, O'Donnell AE, Salathe MA, et al. Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis: final psychometric analyses and determination of minimal important difference scores. Thorax. 2015;70(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao HP, Liu Y, Li HL, et al. Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(4):897–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, et al. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento LR, Scianni AA, Ada L, et al. Predictors of return to work after stroke: a prospective, observational cohort study with 6 months follow-up. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(4):525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf AC, Tate RL, Lannin NA, et al. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(9):747–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2004;35(4):918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz BJ, Ellen Young M, Cox KJ, et al. The crisis of stroke: experiences of patients and their family caregivers. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(6):786–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornrich S, Brines J, Leupp K. Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in marriage. Am Sociol Rev. 2013;78(1):26–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhrah F. Relasi Suami Dan Istri Dalam Keluarga Muslim Menurut Konsep Al-Quran: Analisis Tafsir Maudhuiy. J Anal Islam. 2013;2(1):177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Nasution MSA. Perspektif filsafat hukum Islam atas hak dan kewajiban suami istri dalam perkawinan. Analisis. 2015;15(1):63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Asad A. Membangun Keluarga Sakinah. Tazkiya. 2018;7(2):69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Banford M, Kratz M, Brown R, et al. Stroke survivor caregiver education: methods and effectiveness. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;19(1):37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson A-C, Lindgren I, Hallström B, et al. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke. 2005;36(4):803–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant JS, Glandon GL, Elliott TR, et al. Caregiving problems and feelings experienced by family caregivers of stroke survivors the first month after discharge. Int J Rehabil Res. 2004;27(2):105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen VP, Drageset J, Eide GE, et al. Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar