Perspectives of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy about involvement as research partners: a qualitative study

References

• Trabacca A, Vespino T, Di Liddo A, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with cerebral palsy: improving long-term care. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons C, Brown T, Tseng MH, et al. Evidence-based practice and research utilisation: perceived research knowledge, attitudes, practices and barriers among Australian paediatric occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58(3):178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2012 [cited 2020 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(12):1692–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans BA, Porter A, Snooks H, et al. A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen T, Palisano RJ, Graham I. Perspectives and experiences with engaging youth and families in research. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(3):310–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth F, Saunders C, Elmer A, et al. 'A group of totally awesome people who do stuff' – a qualitative descriptive study of a children and young people's patient and public involvement endeavour. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey S, Boddy K, Briscoe S, et al. Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(4):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsythe LP, Frank LB, Workman TA, et al. Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6(3):245–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood C, Martinez G, Pyatak EA, et al. Engaging patient stakeholders in planning, implementing, and disseminating occupational therapy research. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(1):7301090010p1–7301090010p9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies JC, Morris KP, Duncan HP, et al. Patient and public involvement in Paediatric Intensive Care research: considerations, challenges and facilitating factors. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clavering EK, McLaughlin J. Children's participation in health research: from objects to agents? Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(5):603–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad J, Evans R. Reflections on practical approaches to involving children and young people in the data analysis process. Child Soc. 2007;22(1):41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan OS, Herzog TM, Schiralli JE, et al. Implementation of a youth-adult partnership model in youth mental health systems research: challenges and successes. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1183–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlett N, Shklarov S, Marshall D, et al. Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1057–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnuff J, Brooks R, Duff C, et al. Improving participation outcomes and interventions in neurodisability: co-designing future research. Child Care Health Dev. 2017;43(2):298–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE NIfHR, NHS. Involving children and young people in research: top tips for researchers. Eastleigh (UK): INVOLVE; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Right of the Child; 1990. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Pollard K, Donskoy A-L, Moule P, et al. Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton CB, Leese JC, Hoens AM, et al. Framework for advancing the reporting of patient engagement in rheumatology research projects. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(7):38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7(2):e1000217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O'Flynn-Magee K. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman M, Stewart D, Cunningham CE, et al. "If I had been given that information back then": an interpretive description exploring the information needs of adults with cerebral palsy looking back on their transition to adulthood. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44(5):689–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MR. Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(9):1284–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Con A, McGuinness L, et al. Health care communication issues in multiple sclerosis: an interpretive description. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(1):5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson F. Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success. J Res Nurs. 2007;12(5):473–183.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. New York (NY): Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017;4:2333393617742282–2333393617742288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter C, Suto M. Research methods for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Osfor (UK): Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk S. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(7):1250–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin H. Involving young health service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. Br J Soc Work. 2005;36(8):1395–1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, et al. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):21–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw C, Brady L-M, Davey C. NCB guidelines for research with children and young people; 2011. Available from: https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/ncb-guidelines-for-research-with-children-and-young-people/r/a11G00000017uPCIAY
   Google Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHMRC. Statement on consumer and community involvement in health and medical research Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2016. Available from: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/statement-consumer-and-community-involvement-health-and-medical-research.
   Google Scholar
• Smits DW, van Meeteren K, Klem M, et al. Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the Involvement Matrix. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar