377
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Validation of a translated Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale: a cross-sectional study

, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 5277-5283 | Received 09 Feb 2021, Accepted 17 May 2021, Published online: 01 Jun 2021

References

  • Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
  • Wang YJ, Li ZX, Gu HQ, et al. China stroke statistics 2019: a report from the National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Neurological Diseases, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, the Chinese Stroke Association, National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Global Neuroscience and Stroke Collaborations. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5(3):211–239.
  • Statement on Stroke Care in China [Internet]. Geneva: World Stroke Organisation; 2019. [cited 2021 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.world-stroke.org/news-and-blog/news/statement-on-stroke-care-in-china-june
  • Skolarus Lesli E, Burke James F, Brown Devin L, et al. Understanding stroke survivorship. Stroke. 2014;45(1):224–230.
  • de Graaf JA, Schepers VPM, Nijsse B, et al. The influence of psychological factors and mood on the course of participation up to four years after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 9];1–8.
  • Ezekiel L, Collett J, Mayo NE, et al. Factors associated with participation in life situations for adults with stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):945–955.
  • Crowe C, Coen RF, Kidd N, et al. A qualitative study of the experience of psychological distress post-stroke. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(11):2572–2579.
  • Woodman P, Riazi A, Pereira C, et al. Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(24):2031–2043.
  • van der Kemp J, Kruithof WJ, Nijboer TCW, et al. Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(4):638–653.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.
  • Dean SG, Poltawski L, Forster A, et al. Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain). BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e012375.
  • Grau-Pellicer M, Serdà-Ferrer BC, Medina-Casanovas J, et al. Effectiveness of a multimodal low–moderate-intensity exercise rehabilitation program for stroke survivors. Apunts Medicina de L’Esport. 2018;53(200):147–153.
  • Hwang I, Song R, Ahn S, et al. Exploring the adaptability of tai chi to stroke rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs. 2019;44(4):221–229.
  • Wentink MM, Berger MAM, de Kloet AJ, et al. The effects of an 8-week computer-based brain training programme on cognitive functioning, QoL and self-efficacy after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26(5–6):847–865.
  • Munford D, Gunn H. What are the perceptions and experiences of falls amongst people with stroke who live in the community? Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(5):722–729.
  • Torrisi M, De Cola MC, Buda A, et al. Self-efficacy, poststroke depression, and rehabilitation outcomes: is there a correlation? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(11):3208–3211.
  • Volz M, Möbus J, Letsch C, et al. The influence of early depressive symptoms, social support and decreasing self-efficacy on depression 6 months post-stroke. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:252–255.
  • French MA, Moore MF, Pohlig R, et al. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between balance/walking performance, activity, and participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(2):77–83.
  • Wolf TJ, Baum CM, Lee D, et al. The development of the Improving Participation after Stroke Self-Management Program (IPASS): an exploratory randomized clinical study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(4):284–292.
  • Olawale OA, Usman JS, Oke KI, et al. Evaluation of predictive factors influencing community reintegration in adult patients with stroke. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9(1):6–10.
  • Harel-Katz H, Adar T, Milman U, et al. Examining the feasibility and effectiveness of a culturally adapted participation-focused stroke self-management program in a day-rehabilitation setting: a randomized pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(8):577–589.
  • Lee D, Fogg L, Baum CM, et al. Validation of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale (PS-SES). Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):110–115.
  • Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, et al. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(3):43–58.
  • Heinemann AW, Magasi S, Hammel J, et al. Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):589–595.
  • Lee D, Hammel J, Wilson T. A community living management program for people with disabilities who have moved out of nursing homes: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(8):754–760.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf#
  • Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW, editors. Cross-cultural research and methodology series. Vol. 8, Field methods in cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1986. p. 137–164.
  • MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, et al. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(1):84–99.
  • Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195–201.
  • Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281–302.
  • Piedmont RL. Factorial validity. In: Michalos AC, ed. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 2148–2149.
  • Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In: Schwarzer R, editor. Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Washington (DC): Hemisphere Publishing Corp; 1992. p. 195–213.
  • Cheung SK, Sun SY. Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: further validation of the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychol Rep. 1999;85(3_suppl):1221–1224.
  • Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13(2):50–54.
  • Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Mao HF. Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32(3):140–142.
  • Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, et al. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69(8):583–590.
  • Pang MY, Lau RW, Yeung PK, et al. Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index for use with stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(3):243–250.
  • Wong A, Xiong YY, Kwan PW, et al. The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):81–87.
  • Min Y. Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of Modified Barthel Index for Chinese stroke patients [master’s thesis]. Guangzhou: Sun Yan-Sen University; 2006. Chinese.
  • Zhang L, Liu JM. Modified Rankin Scale. Chinese J Neurosurg. 2012;5:512. Chinese.
  • Cai Y, Jia Z, Zhang X, et al. Study on multi-center investigation of the Chinese version of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. J Beijing Uni Trad Chinese Med. 2008;31(7):494–498. Chinese
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
  • Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8(2):23–74.
  • Korpershoek C, van der Bijl J, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(9):1876–1894.
  • Ekechukwu N, Olaleye O, Hamzat T. Clinical and psychosocial predictors of community reintegration of stroke survivors three months post in-hospital discharge. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017;27(1):27–34.
  • Brouwer-Goossensen D, van Genugten L, Lingsma HF, et al. Self-efficacy for health-related behaviour change in patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke. Psychol Health. 2018;33(12):1490–1501.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.