207
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the upper extremity functional index

, , , , , & show all
Pages 5656-5662 | Received 30 Aug 2020, Accepted 18 Jun 2021, Published online: 06 Jul 2021

References

  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Stratford DM. Development and initial validation of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. Physiother Can. 2001;53:259–267.
  • Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2):56–65.
  • Chesworth BM, Hamilton CB, Walton DM, et al. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Can. 2014;66(3):243–253.
  • Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, et al. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(3):489–495.
  • Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, et al. A comparison of the ability of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(1):31–40.
  • Xiao X, Yang Z, Xia X, et al. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the upper extremity functional index. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;(12):903–906.
  • Hamilton CB, Chesworth BM. A Rasch-validated version of the upper extremity functional index for interval-level measurement of upper extremity function. Phys Ther. 2013;93(11):1507–1519.
  • Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, et al. The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Hand Ther. 2006;19(3):328–348; quiz 349.
  • Razmjou H, Bean A, van Osnabrugge V, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7(1):26.
  • Abbott JH, Schmitt JS. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination. J Clin Epid. 2014;67(6):681–688.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  • Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.
  • Alotaibi NM, Aljadi SH, Alrowayeh HN. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic). Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(25):2469–2478.
  • Alnahdi AH, Alrashid GI, Alkhaldi HA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):897–904.
  • Alnahdi AH. Measurement properties of the 15-item Arabic lower extremity functional scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–6. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1754927.
  • Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal ZA. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(24):2392–2397.
  • Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–227.
  • Coons SJ, Alabdulmohsin SA, Draugalis JR, et al. Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version. Med Care. 1998;36(3):428–432.
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–170.
  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
  • De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Vol. 892. NJ: Pson/Pren H Upr Sdl Rvr; 2009.
  • Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set" – a practical guideline”. Trials. 2016;17(1):449.
  • Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
  • Binkley JM, Stratford P, Kirkpatrick S, et al. Estimating the reliability and validity of the upper extremity functional index in women after breast cancer surgery. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(6):e1261–e1267.
  • Razmjou H, Bean A, Macdermid JC, et al. Convergent validity of the constant-murley outcome measure in patients with rotator cuff disease. Physiother Can. 2008;60(1):72–79.
  • Bobos P, Ziebart C, Furtado R, et al. Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with low back pain, upper and lower extremity disorders. A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2020;21:40–48.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.