2,316
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Typical school-to-work transitions of young adults with disabilities in Germany – a cohort study of recipients of vocational rehabilitation services after leaving school in 2008

&
Pages 5834-5846 | Received 03 Sep 2020, Accepted 20 Jun 2021, Published online: 08 Sep 2021

References

  • Hillmert S. Ausbildungssysteme und Arbeitsmarkt – Lebensverläufe in Großbritannien und Deutschland im Kohortenvergleich [Vocational training systems and the labour market – Biographies in Great Britain and Germany in cohort comparison]. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2001.
  • Veldman K, Reijneveld SA, Verhulst FC, et al. A life course perspective on mental health problems, employment, and work outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(4):316–325.
  • Schmillen A, Umkehrer M. The scars of youth: effects of early-career unemployment on future unemployment experience. Int Labour Rev. 2017;156(3–4):465–494.
  • Powell JW. Constructing disability and social inequality early in the life course. DSQ. 2003;23(2):57–75.
  • Jetha A, Bowring J, Tucker S, et al. Transitions that matter: life course differences in the employment of adults with arthritis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(26):3127–3135.
  • Tophoven S, Reims N, Tisch A. Vocational rehabilitation of young adults with psychological disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(1):150–162.
  • Engels D, Engel H, Schmitz A. Teilhabebericht der Bundesregierung über die Lebenslagen von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen [Participation report of the German Federal Government on the life situation of persons with impairments]. Berlin: ISG Institut für Sozialforschung und Gesellschaftspolitik GmbH im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales, editor. 2016. p. 1–566.
  • Rauch A, Reims N. Inklusion ins Erwerbsleben: Niemand darf wegen einer Behinderung benachteiligt werden [Inclusion in employment: no person shall be disfavoured because of their disability]. IAB-Forum; 2020 [cited]. Available from: https://www.iab-forum.de/inklusion-ins-erwerbsleben-niemand-darf-wegen-einer-behinderung-benachteiligt-werden/
  • Der Paritätische Gesamtverband. Der Paritätische Teilhabebericht 2020 [The participation report 2020]. In: Der Paritätische Gesamtverband, editor. Berlin: Der Paritätische Gesamtverband; 2020.
  • Reims N, Gruber S. Junge Rehabilitanden in der Ausbildung am Übergang in den Arbeitsmarkt [Young rehabilitants in vocational training at the transition to the labour market]. Rehabilitation. 2014;53(06):376–383.
  • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. Disability policy – ‘No person shall be disfavoured because of disability’; 2010 [cited 2021 Mar 23]. Available from: https://www.bmas.de/EN/Our-Topics/Participation-of-Persons-with-Disabilities/disability-policy.html
  • McVicar D, Anyadike-Danes M. Predicting successful and unsuccessful transitions from school to work by using sequence methods. J R Stat Soc A. 2002;165(2):317–334.
  • Achatz J, Jahn K, Schels B. On the non-standard routes: vocational training measures in the school-to-work transitions of lower-qualified youth in Germany. J Vocat Educ Train. 2020:1–22.
  • Dorsett R, Lucchino P. Explaining patterns in the school-to-work transition: an analysis using optimal matching. Adv Life Course Res. 2014;22:1–14.
  • Brzinsky-Fay C. Lost in transition? Labour market entry sequences of school leavers in Europe. Eur Sociol Rev. 2007;23(4):409–422.
  • Brzinsky-Fay C, Solga H. Compressed, postponed, or disadvantaged? School-to-work-transition patterns and early occupational attainment in West Germany. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2016;46:21–26.
  • Walther A. Regimes of youth transitions: choice, flexibility and security in young people’s experiences across different European contexts. Young. 2006;14(2):119–139.
  • Mayer KU, Schoepflin U. The state and the life course. Annu Rev Sociol. 1989;15(1):187–209.
  • Heinz WR. Job-entry patterns in a life-course perspective. In: Heinz WR, editor. From education to work: cross-national perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 214–231.
  • Hillmert S. Traditional inequalities and new insecurities: long-term trends in the transition to the labor market in Germany. In: Tremmel J, editor. A young generation under pressure? Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 57–76.
  • Walther A, Plug W. Transitions from school to work in Europe: destandardization and policy trends. New Direct Child Adolesc Dev. 2006;2006(113):77–90.
  • Pfahl L, Powell JW. Legitimating school segregation. The special education profession and the discourse of learning disability in Germany. Disabil Soc. 2011;26(4):449–462.
  • Aisenbrey S, Fasang A. The interplay of work and family trajectories over the life course: Germany and the United States in comparison. Am J Sociol. 2017;122(5):1448–1484.
  • Aisenbrey S, Fasang AE. New life for old ideas: the ‘second wave’ of sequence analysis bringing the ‘course’ back into the life course. Sociol Methods Res. 2010;38(3):420–462.
  • Abbott A. The idea of outcome in US sociology. In: Steinmetz G, editor. The politics of method in the human sciences. Chapel Hill (NC): Duke University Press; 2005.
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Berufsbildungsbericht 2018 [report on vocational education 2018]. In: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, editor. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; 2018.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz. Sonderpädagogische Förderung in Schulen 2009 bis 2018 [Special pedagogical support in schools 2009 to 2018]. Statistische Veröffentlichungen der Kultusministerkonferenz. Berlin: Kultusministerkonferenz; 2020.
  • Dony E, Gruber S, Jasim A, et al. Basisstudie zur Evaluation von Leistungen zur Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben. Basisstudie Reha-Prozessdatenpanel. Zusammenfassender Bericht (Teil A) [Basic study for the evaluation of benefits for the inclusion of people with disabilities in the working life. Basic study RehaPro. Summary (part A)]. In: Evaluation von Leistungen zur Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales; 2012. p. 6–255.
  • Reims N, Tisch A, Tophoven S. Junge Menschen mit Behinderung: Reha-Verfahren helfen beim Berufseinstieg [Young people with disabilities: vocational rehabilitation helps with the labour market entry]. IAB-Kurzbericht. Nürnberg: IAB; 2016.
  • Reims N, Rauch A, Tophoven S, et al. Perspektive der Leistungserbringer – Modul 4 des Projekts “Evaluation von Leistungen zur Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben” [Perspectives of service providers – module 4 of the project “evaluation of benefits for the inclusion of persons with disabilities in the working life”]. Vol. 542. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales; 2020.
  • Sainsbury R. Labour market participation of persons with disabilities – how can Europe close the disability employment gap? In: Wansing G, Welti F, Schäfers M, editors. The right to work for persons with disabilities – international perspectives. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2018. p. 135–154.
  • Hofmann-Lun I. Förderschüler/innen im Übergang von der Schule ins Arbeitsleben. Beruflich-soziale Integration durch gesonderte Förderung? [Students in special schools in the transition from school to employment. Vocational-social integration by separated support]. In: Deutsches Jugendinstitut e.V., editor. Forschungsschwerpunkt Übergänge im Jugendalter. München: Seiten; 2011. p. 151.
  • Gruber S, Titze N, Zapfel S. Vocational rehabilitation of disabled people in Germany. A systemstheoretical perspective. Disabil Soc. 2014;29(2):224–238.
  • Mayer KU. New directions in life course research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2009;35(1):413–433.
  • Sen A. Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
  • Nussbaum MC. Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2011.
  • Schoon I, Polek E. Teenage career aspirations and adult career attainment: the role of gender, social background and general cognitive ability. Int J Behav Dev. 2011;35(3):210–217.
  • Trani J-F, Bakhshi P, Brown D, et al. Disability as deprivation of capabilities: estimation using a large-scale survey in Morocco and Tunisia and an instrumental variable approach. Soc Sci Med. 2018;211:48–60.
  • Protsch P, Solga H. The social stratification of the German VET system. J Educ Work. 2016;29(6):637–661.
  • Thurow LC. Generating inequality: mechanisms of distribution in the U. S. economy. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1975.
  • Solga H, Kohlrausch B. How low-achieving German youth beat the odds and gain access to vocational training—insights from within-group variation. Eur Sociol Rev. 2013;29(5):1068–1082.
  • Solga H. Lack of training – the employment opportunities of low-skilled persons from a sociological and micro-economic perspective. In: Mayer KU, Solga H, editors. Skill formation. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 173–204.
  • Solga H. Stigmatization by negative selection’: explaining less-educated persons’ decreasing employment opportunities. Eur Sociol Rev. 2002;18(2):159–178.
  • Mortimer JT, Vuolo M, Staff J, et al. Agentic pathways toward fulfillment in work. In: Keller AC, Samual R, Bergman MM, editors. Psychological, educational, and sociological perspectives on success and well-being in career development. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 99–126.
  • Ashby JS, Schoon I. Career success: the role of teenage career aspirations, ambition value and gender in predicting adult social status and earnings. J Vocat Behav. 2010;77(3):350–360.
  • Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, editors. Consequences of growing up poor. New York (NY): Russell Sage Foundation; 1997.
  • Lampert T, Hagen C, Heizmann B, Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland [Health inequality of children and young adults in Germany]. In: Robert-Koch-Institut, editor. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: Robert-Koch-Institut; 2010.
  • Laubstein C, G. H., Seddig N. Armutsfolgen für Kinder und Jugendliche – Erkenntnisse aus empirischen Studien in Deutschland [Consequences of poverty for children and youth – Findings from empirical studies in Germany]. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2016.
  • Ek E, Sovio U, Remes J, et al. Social predictors of unsuccessful entrance into the labour market—a socialization process perspective. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66(3):471–486.
  • Niehaus M, Kaul T, Friedrich-Gärtner L, et al. Zugangswege junger Menschen mit Behinderung in Ausbildung und Beruf [Ways to enter vocational training and employment of young people with disabilities]. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; 2012.
  • Reims N, Tophoven S, Tisch A, et al. Aufbau und Analyse des LTA-Rehaprozessdatenpanels. Eine Prozessdatenbasis zur Untersuchung beruflicher Rehabilitation in Trägerschaft der Bundesagentur für Arbeit. Modul 1 des Projekts “Evaluation von Leistungen zur Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben” [Establishment and analysis of the German Reha-Process Data Panel. A process-produced data base to analyse vocational rehabilitation financed by the Federal Employment Agency. Module 1 of the project “evaluation of benefits for the inclusion of persons with disabilities in the working life”]. In: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, editor. Evaluation von Leistungen zur Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales; 2018. p. 1–127.
  • Abbott A. Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas. Annu Rev Sociol. 1995;21(1):93–113.
  • Dlouhy K, Biemann T. Optimal matching analysis in career research: a review and some best-practice recommendations. J Vocat Behav. 2015; 90:163–173.
  • McLeod CB, Reiff E, Maas E, et al. Identifying return-to-work trajectories using sequence analysis in a cohort of workers with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(2):147–155.
  • Amick BC, McLeod CB, Bültmann U. Labor markets and health: an integrated life course perspective. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(4):346–353.
  • Abbott A, Tsay A. Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology. Sociol Methods Res. 2000;29(1):3–33.
  • Ward JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58(301):236–244.
  • Studer M. Weighted cluster library manual: a practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R. LIVES Working Papers. 2013;24.
  • Heineck G, Kleinert C, Vosseler A, et al. Typisierung regionaler Ausbildungsmärkte [Characterisation of local vocational training markets]. Nürnberg: IAB-Kurzbericht; 2011. p. 8.
  • Haasler SR, Gottschall K. Still a perfect model? The gender impact of vocational training in Germany. J Vocat Educ Train. 2015;67(1):78–92.
  • Schachler V. Übergangsförderung an Werkstätten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung in Bayern [Employment transition support in sheltered workshops. Results from a study in Bavaria]. Dialog. 2013;29(2):13–15.
  • Fischer B, Gericke T. Übergänge aus WfbM auf den allgemeinen Arbeitsmarkt: Ergebnisse einer Studie im Land Brandenburg [Transitions from sheltered workshops to the regular labour market: results from a study in the federal state of Brandenburg]. Berufliche Rehabilitation. 2016;30(1):24–36.
  • Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: a social cognitive analysis. J Counsel Psychol. 2000;47(1):36–49.
  • Stewart D, Law M, Young NL, et al. Complexities during transitions to adulthood for youth with disabilities: person–environment interactions. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):1998–2004.
  • Irvin MJ, Byun S, Meece JL, et al. Educational barriers of rural youth: relation of individual and contextual difference variables. J Career Assess. 2012;20(1):71–87.
  • Zahradnik F, Schreyer F, Moczall A, et al. Wenig gebildet, viel sanktioniert? Zur Selektivität von Sanktionen in der Grundsicherung des SGB II [Low education, high sanctions? On the selectivity in the context of basic income support]. Z Sozialreform. 2016;62(2):141–180.
  • Van Hal L, Meershoek A, Nijhuis F, et al. Disembodied abilities: sick role and participation in ‘activating’ return-to-work practices. Soc Sci Med. 2013;96:9–16.
  • Nivorozhkin A. Overcoming barriers: effects of entering vocational rehabilitation on labour market outcomes. Int J Soc Welfare. 2019;28(3):260–211.
  • Schreiner M. A need for sheltered workshop reform? Perspectives from employees and legal trends due to the German Federal Participation Act. In: Wansing G, Welti F, Schäfers M, editors. The right to work for persons with disabilities – international perspectives. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2018. p. 327–342.