PREsurgery thoughts – thoughts on prehabilitation in oncologic gynecologic surgery, a qualitative template analysis in older adults and their healthcare professionals

References

• Minnella EM, Carli F. Prehabilitation and functional recovery for colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(7):919–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes MJ, Hackney RJ, Lamb PJ, et al. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1661–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheede-Bergdahl C, Minnella EM, Carli F. Multi-modal prehabilitation: addressing the why, when, what, how, who and where next? Anaesthesia. 2019;74:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmeyer PE, Carli F, Evans DC, et al. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative joint consensus statement on nutrition screening and therapy within a surgical enhanced recovery pathway. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(6):1883–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels SL, Lee MJ, George J, et al. Prehabilitation in elective abdominal cancer surgery in older patients: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJS Open. 2020;4(6):1022–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney-Brooks M, Tellawi AR, Scalici J, et al. Frailty: an outcome predictor for elderly gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(1):20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver JA, Viswanathan AN. Frailty measure is more predictive of outcomes after curative therapy for endometrial cancer than traditional risk factors in women 60 and older. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(3):526–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George EM, Burke WM, Hou JY, et al. Measurement and validation of frailty as a predictor of outcomes in women undergoing major gynaecological surgery. BJOG. 2015;123:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Langstraat CL, DeJong SR, et al. Functional not chronologic age: frailty index predicts outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147(1):104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal S, Igwe E, Rice LW, et al. Frailty index predicts severe complications in gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(1):98–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montroni I, Rostoft S, Spinelli A, et al. GOSAFE - Geriatric Oncology Surgical Assessment and Functional rEcovery after surgery: early analysis on 977 patients. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(2):244–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saur NM, Montroni I, Ghignone F, et al. Attitudes of surgeons toward elderly cancer patients: a survey from the SIOG Surgical Task Force. Visc Med. 2017;33(4):262–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Armbrust R, Spies C, et al. Prehabilitation programs and ERAS protocols in gynecological oncology: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli F, Brown R, Kennepohl S. Prehabilitation to enhance postoperative recovery for an octogenarian following robotic-assisted hysterectomy with endometrial cancer. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59(8):779–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essery R, Geraghty AW, Kirby S, et al. Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(6):519–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkers CCM, Bakker CH. Artsen stellen behoeften van ouderen centraal. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:A8075.
   Google Scholar
• Fleuren MA, Paulussen TG, Van Dommelen P, et al. Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(5):501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N, Brooks JM. Philosophical issues when using template analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2018. p. 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Integrated care for older people: guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Phillippi J, Lauderdale J. A guide to field notes for qualitative research: context and conversation. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(3):381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):561–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen MP, Van Schaik TM, Twickler TB, et al. Applicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the Netherlands. J Health Commun. 2011;16(3):134–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(6):1073–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, et al. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polen-De C, Langstraat C, Asiedu GB, et al. Advanced ovarian cancer patients identify opportunities for prehabilitation: a qualitative study. Gynecol Oncol Reports. 2021;36:100731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A, Thaysen HV, Soegaard CH, et al. Investigating the experiences, thoughts, and feelings underlying and influencing prehabilitation among cancer patients: a qualitative perspective on the what, when, where, who, and why. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A, Vind Thaysen H, Hasselholt Soegaard C, et al. Prehabilitation in cancer care: patients’ ability to prepare for major abdominal surgery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35(1):143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns ERJ, van den Heuvel B, Buskens CJ, et al. The effects of physical prehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(8):267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli F, Ferreira V. Prehabilitation: a new area of integration between geriatricians, anesthesiologists, and exercise therapists. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(3):241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigano A, Kasvis P, Di Tomasso J, et al. Pearls of optimizing nutrition and physical performance of older adults undergoing cancer therapy. J Geriatr Oncol. 2017;8(6):428–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International society of geriatric oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(24):2595–2603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukez A, Baima J. The Role and scope of prehabilitation in cancer care. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(1):150976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agasi-Idenburg CS, van Zuilen MK, Westerman MJ, et al. “I am busy surviving” - Views about physical exercise in older adults scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(3):444–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker NH, Lee RE, O’Connor DP, et al. Supports and barriers to home-based physical activity during preoperative treatment of pancreatic cancer: a mixed-methods study. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(12):1113–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira V, Agnihotram RV, Bergdahl A, et al. Maximizing patient adherence to prehabilitation: what do the patients say? Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(8):2717–2723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli F, Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, et al. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation vs postoperative rehabilitation on 30-day postoperative complications for frail patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(3):233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlHilli MM, Elson P, Rybicki L, et al. Time to surgery and its impact on survival in patients with endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database study. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153(3):511–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanthamongkolkul K, Hanprasertpong J. Longer waiting times for early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy are associated with diminished long-term overall survival. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26(4):262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar