mHealth technologies used to capture walking and arm use behavior in adult stroke survivors: a scoping review beyond measurement properties

References

• Newell KM. What are fundamental motor skills and what is fundamental about them? J Mot Learn Dev. 2020;8(2):280–314.
   Google Scholar
• Adibi S. Mobile Health: a technology road map. Springer series in bio-/neuroinformatics. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLOS One. 2014;9(7):e103135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, et al. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1340–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, et al. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1498–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doman CA, Waddell KJ, Bailey RR, et al. Changes in upper-extremity functional capacity and daily performance during outpatient occupational therapy for people with stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(3):7003290040p1–7003290040p11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, et al. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD012543.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, et al. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie DR, Bird ML, Menon C, et al. Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English C, Manns PJ, Tucak C, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, et al. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017;97(7):707–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Barth J, Holleran CL, et al. Implementation of wearable sensing technology for movement: pushing forward into the routine physical rehabilitation care field. Sensors. 2020;20(20):5744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thilarajah S, Clark RA, Williams G. Wearable sensors and Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies to assess and promote physical activity in stroke: a narrative review. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(1):34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini NA, Burge AT, Bernhardt J, et al. Two days of measurement provides reliable estimates of physical activity poststroke: an observational study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):883–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2020; [cited 2020 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Set correlation and contingency tables. Appl Psychol Meas. 1988;12(4):425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal J, Wilkinson A, Chignell M. Physiotherapists' and physiotherapy students' perspectives on the use of mobile or wearable technology in their practice. Physiother Can. 2018;70(3):251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, et al. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1561–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HL, Lin KC, Hsieh YW, et al. A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(1):75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Simpson LA, et al. Investigating measures of intensity during a structured upper limb exercise program in stroke rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(12):2410–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Heron C, Fang K, Gubbi J, et al. Wireless accelerometry is feasible in acute monitoring of upper limb motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(5):336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, et al. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal B, Uswatte G, Barman J, et al. Network of movement and proximity sensors for monitoring upper-extremity motor activity after stroke: proof of principle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(3):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbin MA, Bailey RR, Lang CE. Validity of body-worn sensor acceleration metrics to index upper extremity function in hemiparetic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(2):111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, et al. Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(9):1437–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubbi J, Rao AS, Fang K, et al. Motor recovery monitoring using acceleration measurements in post acute stroke patients. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochniewicz EM, Emmer G, McLeod A, et al. Measuring functional arm movement after stroke using a single wrist-worn sensor and machine learning. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(12):2880–2887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Niet M, Bussmann JB, Ribbers GM, et al. The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1121–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertzgaard P, Öhberg F, Gerdle B, et al. A new way of assessing arm function in activity using kinematic exposure variation analysis and portable inertial sensors—a validity study. Man Ther. 2016;21:241–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gebruers N, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, et al. Actigraphic measurement of motor deficits in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(5):533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, et al. Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke. 2000;31(3):662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Hobbs Qadri L. A behavioral observation system for quantifying arm activity in daily life after stroke. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(4):398–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas D, Cranny A, Gupta N, et al. Recognizing upper limb movements with wrist worn inertial sensors using k-means clustering classification. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;40:59–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobin M, Bimbard F, Boukalle M, et al. SpECTRUM: Smart ECosystem for sTRoke patient’s upper limbs monitoring. Smart Health. 2019;13:100066.
   Google Scholar
• Zambrana C, Idelsohn-Zielonka S, Claramunt-Molet M, et al. Monitoring of upper-limb movements through inertial sensors – preliminary results. Smart Health. 2019;13:100059.
   Google Scholar
• Costa PHV, de Jesus TPD, Winstein C, et al. An investigation into the validity and reliability of mHealth devices for counting steps in chronic stroke survivors. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(3):394–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polese JC, Faria GSE, Ribeiro-Samora GA, et al. Google fit smartphone application or Gt3X actigraph: which is better for detecting the stepping activity of individuals with stroke? A validity study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(3):461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchán-Baeza JA, González-Sánchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Using smartphones to collect quantitative data on lower limb functionality in people who have suffered a stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(12):3555–3562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos C, DePaul VG, Knorr S, et al. Validity of the ActiGraph activity monitor for individuals who walk slowly post-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(4):295–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagnat M, Batcho CS, David R, et al. Validity of the walked distance estimated by wearable devices in stroke individuals. Sensors. 2019;19(11):2497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen TD, Simpson LA, Lim SB, et al. "Stepping Up" activity poststroke: ankle-positioned accelerometer can accurately record steps during slow walking. Phys Ther. 2016;96(3):355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duclos NC, Aguiar LT, Aissaoui R, et al. Activity monitor placed at the nonparetic ankle is accurate in measuring step counts during community walking in poststroke individuals: a validation study. PM R. 2019;11(9):963–971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaffer SD, Holzapfel SD, Fulk G, et al. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(10):788–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll SL, Greig CA, Lewis SJ, et al. The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(3):466–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen TD, Semrau JA, Dukelow SP, et al. Consumer-based physical activity monitor as a practical way to measure walking intensity during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2017;48(9):2614–2617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Xu X, Batalin M, et al. Reliability and validity of bilateral ankle accelerometer algorithms for activity recognition and walking speed after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2246–2250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale LA, Pal J, Becker I. Measuring free-living physical activity in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction with a triaxial accelerometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1765–1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saremi K, Marehbian J, Yan X, et al. Reliability and validity of bilateral thigh and foot accelerometry measures of walking in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(2):297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt M, van Alphen B, van de Port IG, et al. Clinimetric properties of a novel feedback device for assessing gait parameters in stroke survivors. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Combs SA, Danks KA, et al. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):222–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Kwon S, Kim WS, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of using accelerometers to measure physical activities of patients with stroke during inpatient rehabilitation. PLOS One. 2018;13(12):e0209607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria GS, Polese JC, Ribeiro-Samora GA, et al. Validity of the accelerometer and smartphone application in estimating energy expenditure in individuals with chronic stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(3):236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagnat M, Mandigout S, Chaparro D, et al. Validity of the Actigraph GT3x and influence of the sensor positioning for the assessment of active energy expenditure during four activities of daily living in stroke subjects. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(12):1696–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck RS, Best JR, Li MCR, et al. Revisiting the MotionWatch8©: calibrating cut-points for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior among adults with stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanchamps MHJ, Horemans HLD, Ribbers GM, et al. The accuracy of the detection of body postures and movements using a physical activity monitor in people after a stroke. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Forrester LW, et al. Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):1997–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman C, Mummidisetty CK, Mannix-Slobig A, et al. Variables influencing wearable sensor outcome estimates in individuals with stroke and incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot investigation validating two research grade sensors. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2018;15(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandigout S, Lacroix J, Ferry B, et al. Can energy expenditure be accurately assessed using accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring in post-stroke patients in the subacute phase? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(18):2009–2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge S, Stott NS. Test–retest reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor outputs in individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(10–11):871–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, et al. How active are people with stroke? Use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009;40(1):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra MC, Balraj E, DiSanzo BL, et al. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(1):18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu N, Hashidate H, Ota T, et al. Reliability of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an activity monitor in people with subacute stroke in the hospital setting: a cross-sectional study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(4):288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanroy C, Vissers D, Cras P, et al. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(20):1695–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buneviciene I, Mekary RA, Smith TR, et al. Can mHealth interventions improve quality of life of cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;157:103123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudberg AS, Berge E, Laska AC, et al. Stroke survivors' priorities for research related to life after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;5:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Selves C, Stoquart G, Lejeune T. Gait rehabilitation after stroke: review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes and timing for interventions. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(4):783–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Gill TJ, Brauer SG. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(13):981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ. The best we can be is yet to come. Phys Ther. 2009;89(11):1236–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson JL, De Serres SJ, Lamontagne A. The effect of arm movements on the lower limb during gait after a stroke. Gait Posture. 2010;31(1):109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Plummer-D’Amato P, Elashoff R, Lee J. International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(3):235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DB, Breslin M, Cumming T, et al. Go home, sit less: the impact of home versus hospital rehabilitation environment on activity levels of stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(11):2216–2221.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey A, Vratsistas-Curto A, Schurr K. Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):323–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Bode RK. Factors influencing therapists' decision-making in the acceptance of new technology devices in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(5):415–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Eng JJ, Boyd LA, et al. Exploring the role of accelerometers in the measurement of real world upper-limb use after stroke. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(1):16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, Burridge JH, et al. Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke: consensus-based core recommendations from the second stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(11):951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesko B, Győrffy Z. The rise of the empowered physician in the digital health era: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e12490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskó B, Radó N, Győrffy Z. Opinion leader empowered patients about the era of digital health: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgueiro C, Urrùtia G, Cabanas-Valdés R. Available apps for stroke telerehabilitation during corona virus disease 2019 confinement in Spain. Dis Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;1–11.
   Google Scholar