1,392
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

The clinical outcome of physiotherapy after reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 6997-7008 | Received 07 May 2020, Accepted 21 Sep 2021, Published online: 07 Oct 2021

References

  • Gumina S, Paladini P, Grassi FA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Switz: Springer Nat; 2019.
  • Stephens SP, Paisley KC, Giveans MR, et al. The effect of proximal humeral bone loss on revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(10):1519–1526.
  • Baulot E, Sirveaux F, Boileau P. Grammont's idea: the story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2425–2431.
  • Bullock GS, Garrigues GE, Ledbetter L, et al. A systematic review of proposed rehabilitation guidelines following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(5):337–346.
  • Pandya J, Johnson T, Low AK. Shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis: a review of surgical management. Maturitas. 2018;108:71–76.
  • Edwards PK, Ebert JR, Littlewood C, et al. Effectiveness of formal physical therapy following total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. Shoulder Elb. 2020;12(2):136–143.
  • Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, et al. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):1115–1120.
  • Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, et al. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A. 2011;93:2249–2254.
  • Trofa D, Rajaee SS, Smith EL. Nationwide trends in total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop. 2014;43:166–172.
  • Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, et al. Neer award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(5):527–540.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty annual report 2017; 2017.
  • Mather RC, Watters TS, Orlando LA, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(3):325–334.
  • National Joint Registry. 14th annual report 2017 National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; 2017.
  • Anakwenze O, Fokin A, Chocas M, et al. Complications in total shoulder and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty by body mass index. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(7):1230–1237.
  • Fevang BTS, Lie SA, Havelin LI, et al. Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1,825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):83–91.
  • Wilcox RB, Arslanian LE, Millett PJ. Rehabilitation following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(12):821–836.
  • Buckley T, Miller R, Nicandri G, et al. Analysis of subscapularis integrity and function after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty using ultrasound and validated clinical outcome measures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(9):1309–1317.
  • Hughes M, Neer CS. Glenohumeral joint replacement and postoperative rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 1975;55(8):850–858.
  • Kwaees TA, Charalambous CP. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty-minimum age for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and long term restrictions. A Delphi consensus study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014;16(4):435–439.
  • Fusaro I, Orsini S, Stignani S, et al. Proposal for SICSeG guidelines for rehabilitation after anatomical shoulder prosthesis in concentric shoulder osteoarthritis. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97(Suppl 1):31–37.
  • Simovitch R, Flurin PH, Wright T, et al. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(2):298–305.
  • Merolla G, Parel I, Cutti AG, et al. Assessment of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the scapula-weighted Constant-Murley score. Int Orthop. 2019;43(3):659–667.
  • Hagen MS, Allahabadi S, Zhang AL, et al. A randomized single-blinded trial of early rehabilitation versus immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(3):442–450.
  • Collin P, Matsukawa T, Denard PJ, et al. Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics. 2017;41(10):2135–2142.
  • Michael RJ, Williams BA, Laguerre MD, et al. Correlation of multiple patient-reported outcome measures across follow-up in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28(10):1869–1876.
  • Kim MS, Jeong HY, Kim JD, et al. Difficulty in performing activities of daily living associated with internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020;29(1):86–94.
  • Lopiz Y, Alcobía-Díaz B, Galán-Olleros M, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(12):2259–2271.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012.
  • MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Law M. Critical appraisal of research evidence for its validity and usefulness. Hand Clin. 2009;25(1):29–42.
  • Saier T, Cotic M, Kirchhoff C, et al. Early results after modular non-cemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective single-Centre study of 38 consecutive cases. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(5):830–836.
  • Roy J-S, MacDermid JC, Goel D, et al. What is a successful outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? TOORTHJ. 2010;4(1):157–163.
  • Villodre-Jiménez J, Estrems-Díaz V, Diranzo-García J, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 3 and 4 part proximal humeral fractures in patients aged more than 65 years: results and complications. Rev Española Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatol. 2017;61(1):43–50.
  • França FDO, Freitas JMA, Godinho PC, et al. Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow‐up. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018;53(6):714–720.
  • King JJ, Farmer KW, Struk AM, et al. Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2015;39(2):291–298.
  • Martinez AA, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, et al. The treatment of proximal humerus nonunions in older patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injury. 2012;43:S3–S6.
  • Simovitch RW, Roche CP, Jones RB, et al. Effect of tuberosity healing on clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(2):E39–E45.
  • Triplet JJ, Everding NG, Levy JC, et al. Functional internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(6):867–874.
  • Walters JD, Barkoh K, Smith RA, et al. Younger patients report similar activity levels to older patients after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(9):1418–1424.
  • Patel MK, Stone WZ, Schoch BS, et al. Does having prior rotator cuff repair affect outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A matched cohort study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(4):661–665.
  • Schmalzl J, Jessen M, Holschen M, et al. Tuberosity healing improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(5):909–916.
  • Kemp AL, King JJ, Farmer KW, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(7):1138–1145.
  • Maier MW, Caspers M, Zeifang F, et al. How does reverse shoulder replacement change the range of motion in activities of daily living in patients with cuff tear arthropathy? A prospective optical 3D motion analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(8):1065–1071.
  • Ross M, Hope B, Stokes A, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(2):215–222.
  • Russo R, Della Rotonda G, Cautiero F, et al. Reverse shoulder prosthesis to treat complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients: results after 10-year experience. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015;99 Suppl 1:S17–S23.
  • Rienmüller A, Maffiuletti NA, Schwyzer H-K, et al. Shoulder muscle strength and neuromuscular activation 2 years after reverse shoulder prosthesis—an experimental case control study. JCM. 2020;9(2):365.
  • Chapman RM, Torchia MT, Bell JE, et al. Continuously monitoring shoulder motion after total shoulder arthroplasty: maximum elevation and time spent above 90° of elevation are critical metrics to monitor. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(8):1505–1514.
  • Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(12):1737–1748.
  • Walch G, Bacle G, Lädermann A, et al. Do the indications, results, and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty change with surgeon’s experience? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(11):1470–1477.
  • Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, et al. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):147S–S161.
  • Roberson TA, Bentley JC, Griscom JT, et al. Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(7):1298–1306.
  • Sershon RA, Van Thiel GS, Lin EC, et al. Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(3):395–400.
  • Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, et al. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):146–157.
  • Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A. 2007;89:1476–1485.
  • Blacknall J, Neumann L. Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder replacement. Shoulder Elb. 2011;3(4):232–240.
  • Pierre PS, Frankle M. Shoulder Rehabilitation. Is there a role for home therapy?. In: Physical therapy: theories, practices and benefits. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2011.
  • Thomopoulos S, Williams GR, Soslowsky LJ. Tendon to bone healing: differences in biomechanical, structural, and compositional properties due to a range of activity levels. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125(1):106–113.
  • Mulieri PJ, Holcomb JO, Dunning P, et al. Is a formal physical therapy program necessary after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(4):570–579.
  • Eriksson L, Lindström B, Gard G, et al. Physiotherapy at a distance: a controlled study of rehabilitation at home after a shoulder joint operation. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(5):215–220.
  • Bettger JP, Thoumi A, Marquevich V, et al. COVID-19: maintaining essential rehabilitation services across the care continuum. BMJ Glob Heal. 2020;5:1–7.
  • Anton D, Berges I, Bermúdez J, et al. A telerehabilitation system for the selection, evaluation and remote management of therapies. Sensors. 2018;18:1–21.
  • Cason J. A pilot telerehabilitation program: delivering early intervention services to rural families. Int J Telerehabil. 2009;1(1):29–38.
  • Russell TG, Buttrum P, Wootton R, et al. Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A. 2011;93(2):113–120.
  • Doiron-Cadrin P, Kairy D, Vendittoli PA, et al. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a tele-prehabilitation program and an in-person prehablitation program compared to usual care for total hip or knee arthroplasty candidates: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;0:1–10.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.