French cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Moorong Self-Efficacy scale: the MSES-FR, a measure of Self-Efficacy for French people with spinal cord injury

References

• Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, et al. Prospective study of the occurrence of psychological disorders and comorbidities after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(8):1426–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. 13. printing. New York (NY): Freeman; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Peter C, Müller R, Cieza A, et al. Psychological resources in spinal cord injury: a systematic literature review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(3):188–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Diemen T, Crul T, van Nes I, SELF-SCI Group, et al. Associations between Self-Efficacy and secondary health conditions in people living with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(12):2566–2577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Diemen T, Craig A, van Nes IJW, SELF-SCI Group, et al. Enhancing our conceptual understanding of state and trait self-efficacy by correlational analysis of four self-efficacy scales in people with spinal cord injury. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonanno GA, Kennedy P, Galatzer-Levy IR, et al. Trajectories of resilience, depression, and anxiety following spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(3):236–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton J, Tran Y, Craig A. Relationship between quality of life and Self-Efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1643–1648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic SA, Dorstyn DS, Guiver NG. Examining factors that contribute to the process of resilience following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(7):553–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer N, Akkuş S, Uğurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World J Orthop. 2015;6(1):24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang F, Cheng Z, Wen X. Effect of continuous care intervention on the quality of life in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Int Med Res. 47(5):2011–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3 Suppl 1):87–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton J, Tate RL, Geraghty TJ. Self-Efficacy and spinal cord injury: Psychometric properties of a new scale. Rehabil Psychol. 2003;48(4):281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Smedema SM, Tu W-M, et al. Psychometric validation of the moorong Self-Efficacy scale in people with spinal cord injury: a brief report. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2014;58(1):54–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SM. The measurement of self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: psychometric validation of the moorong self-efficacy scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(12):988–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajati F, Ghanbari M, Hasandokht T, et al. Persian version of the moorong Self-Efficacy scale: psychometric study among subjects with physical disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2436–2445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton J, Tran Y, Lo C, et al. Reexamining the validity and dimensionality of the moorong Self-Efficacy scale: Improving its clinical utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(12):2130–2136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J. Un guide de validation transculturelle des instruments de mesure en santé mentale. 1999. [cited 2020 Jan 22]; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2157.7041.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Linstone HA, Turoff M. The delphi method: Techniques and applications. J Mark Res. 1976;13(3):317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson JI, Tavakoly B, Witteveen AB, et al. TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a delphi process. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(1):69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor (UK): NFER-NELSON. 1995; p. 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont M, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. French adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-Validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplège A, Mesbah M, Marquis P. [Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of the french version of an international questionnaire measuring the quality of life: the MOS SF-36 (version 1.1)]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1995;43(4):371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais MR, Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, et al. L’échelle de satisfaction de vie: Validation canadienne-française du “satisfaction with life scale. Can J Behav Sci Rev Can Sci Comport. 1989;21(2):210–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lépine JP, Godchau M, Brun P, et al. Evaluation of anxiety and depression among patients hospitalized on an internal medicine service. Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1985;143:175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard B. Le concept de stress et ses méthodes d'évaluation. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princet (NJ): Princet Univ Press; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Vallieres EF, Vallerand RJ. Traduction et validation Canadienne-Française de L’échelle de L’estime de soi de rosenberg. Int J Psychol. 1990;25(2):305–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Carr JE, et al. The ways of coping checklist: Revision and psychometric properties. Multivariate Behav Res. 1985;20(1):3–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Cousson F, Quintard B, et al. French adaptation of the ways of coping checklist. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;83(1):104–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, et al. Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Rascle N, Gelie FC, et al. Le questionnaire de soutien social de sarason (SSQ6). Une Adaptation Française. 2003;48(3):41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch RL. Exploratory factor analysis. In: Nesselroade JR, Cattell RB, editors. Handb multivar exp psychol [internet]. Boston (MA): Springer US; 1988. [cited 2020 Aug 19]. p. 231–258. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher L. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personal Individ Differ. 2007;42(5):815–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvis Aparicio M, Carrard V, Morselli D, et al.; SwiSCI Study Group. Profiles of psychological adaptation outcomes at discharge from spinal cord injury inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(3):401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter C, Müller R, Post MWM, et al.; The Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Group. Depression in spinal cord injury: Assessing the role of psychological resources. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60(1):67–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Kilvert A, Hasson L. A 21-year longitudinal analysis of impact, coping, and appraisals following spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2016;61(1):92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser S, Kennedy P. An exploration of cognitive appraisals following spinal cord injury. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(6):708–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, et al. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: Determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20(4):807–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter C, Müller R, Post MWM, et al. Psychological resources, appraisals, and coping and their relationship to participation in spinal cord injury: a path analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(9):1662–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrard V, Kunz S, Peter C. Mental health, quality of life, self-efficacy, and social support of individuals living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland compared to that of the general population. Spinal Cord. 2020;59(4):398–409 [cited 2021 Feb 5]; Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-020-00582-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar