Workers’ views on involving significant others in occupational health care: a focus group study among workers with a chronic disease

References

• European Chronic Disease Alliance. Joint Statement on “Improving the employment of people with chronic diseases in Europe”. 2017. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/policies/docs/2017_chronic_framingdoc_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD/EU. Health at a Glance: Europe 2016 - State of Health in the EU Cycle. OECD Publishing. 2016. DOI: 10.1787/9789264265592-en
   Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(6):920–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snippen NC, Vries H. D, Burg-Vermeulen S. V D, et al. Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosland A-MM, Heisler M, Piette JD. The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2012;35(2):221–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deek H, Hamilton S, Brown N, et al.; FAMILY Project Investigators. Family-centred approaches to healthcare interventions in chronic diseases in adults: a quantitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(5):968–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, et al.; MyBCC study group. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(S3):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks J, McCluskey S, King N, et al. Illness perceptions in the context of differing work participation outcomes: Exploring the influence of significant others in persistent back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martire L, Schulz R, Helgeson VS, et al. Review and Meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40(3):325–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann M, Bäzner E, Wild B, et al. Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: a Meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly GR, Scott JE, Mamon J. Medication compliance and health education among outpatients with chronic mental disorders. Med Care. 1990;28(12):1181–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Cook S, et al. A randomized trial of individual and couple behavioral alcohol treatment for women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(2):243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vooijs M, van der Heide I, Leensen MCJ, et al. Richtlijn Chronisch Zieken en Werk [Guideline ’The chronically ill and work’]. Amsterdam; 2016. Available from: https://www.psynip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Richtlijn_chronisch_zieken_en_werk_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic pain. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/media/1108/sign136_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Brain injury rehabilitation in adults. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign130.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation in adults. Clinical guideline [CG162]. NICE; 2013;1:44. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg162/resources/stroke-rehabilitation-in-adults-pdf-35109688408261
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression in Adults: recognition and Management. Clinical guideline [CG90]. Natl Collab Cent Ment Heal. 2009. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90/resources/depression-in-adults-recognition-and-management-975742636741
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE (UK). Rehabilitation after critical illness. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk JL, Bekedam Ma Brouwer W, et al. Richtlijn Ischemische Hartziekten [Guideline Ischemic Heart Disease]. Utrecht. 2007 [cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: www.nvab-online.nl
   Google Scholar
• Lamore K, Montalescot L, Untas A. Treatment decision-making in chronic diseases: what are the family members' roles, needs and attitudes? A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(12):2172–2181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell RC, Butow PN, Bu S, et al. Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(1):3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meis LA, Griffin JM, Greer N, et al. Couple and family involvement in adult mental health treatment: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(2):275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snippen NC, de Vries HJ, de Wit M, et al. Assessing significant others’ cognitions and behavioral responses in occupational health care for workers with a chronic disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;43(19):2690–2703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, et al. The person-based approach to intervention development: Application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta K, Lee H. A practical guide to needs assessment. Perform Improv. 2001;40(8):40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp RJ, Hobson J. Patient and physician views of accompanied consultations in occupational health. Occup Med. 2016;66(8):643–648.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, et al. Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(10):4131–4140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JL, Roter DL. Family presence in routine medical visits: a Meta-analytical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):823–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson J, Hobson H, Sharp R. Accompanied consultations in occupational health. OCCMED. 2016;66(3):238–240.
   Google Scholar
• Manne S, Ostroff JS, Winkel G. Social-Cognitive processes as moderators of a Couple-Focused group intervention for women with early stage breast cancer. Heal Psychol Published. 2007;26(6):735–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH, et al. Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2009;115(S18):4326–4338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdorf A, Elders L. Occupational medicine in The Netherlands. Occup Med. 2010;60(4):314–314.
   Google Scholar
• Davey J, Holden CA, Smith BJ. The correlates of chronic disease-related health literacy and its components among men: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sim D, Yuan SE, Yun JH. Health literacy and physician-patient communication: a review of the literature. Int J Commun Heal. 2016;10:101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, et al. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011;155(2):97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar