1,771
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Accelerometer assessed upper limb activity in people with stroke: a validation study considering ambulatory and non-ambulatory activities

, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 8463-8470 | Received 03 Mar 2021, Accepted 27 Nov 2021, Published online: 14 Dec 2021

References

  • de Niet M, Bussmann JB, Ribbers GM, et al. The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1121–1126.
  • Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, et al. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):288–297.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(5–6):453–460.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
  • Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26(1):76–84.
  • Reiterer V, Sauter C, Klosch G, et al. Actigraphy-a useful tool for motor activity monitoring in stroke patients. Eur Neurol. 2008;60(6):285–291.
  • Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, et al. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1498–1501.
  • Bernmark E, Wiktorin C. A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(6):541–547.
  • Chen KY, Acra SA, Majchrzak K, et al. Predicting energy expenditure of physical activity using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(6):1023–1033.
  • Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, et al. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(2):56–63.
  • Leuenberger K, Gonzenbach R, Wachter S, et al. A method to qualitatively assess arm use in stroke survivors in the home environment. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55(1):141–150.
  • Lonini L, Dai A, Shawen N, et al. Wearable sensors for parkinson's disease: which data are worth collecting for training symptom detection models. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:64.
  • Silfee VJ, Haughton CF, Jake-Schoffman DE, et al. Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: a systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2018;11:74–80.
  • Suzuki M, Mitoma H, Yoneyama M. Quantitative analysis of motor status in parkinson's disease using wearable devices: from methodological considerations to problems in clinical applications. Parkinsons Dis. 2017;2017:6139716.
  • Arvidsson D, Fridolfsson J, Borjesson M, et al. Re-examination of accelerometer data processing and calibration for the assessment of physical activity intensity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29(10):1442–1452.
  • Leeger-Aschmann CS, Schmutz EA, Zysset AE, et al. Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers - comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):513.
  • Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103135.
  • Lang CE, Waddell KJ, Klaesner JW, et al. A method for quantifying upper limb performance in daily life using accelerometers. J Vis Exp. 2017;(122):55673. DOI:10.3791/55673.
  • Little VL, Perry LA, Mercado MWV, et al. Gait asymmetry pattern following stroke determines acute response to locomotor task. Gait Posture. 2020;77:300–307.
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
  • Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C. Early planning of care and rehabilitation after amputation for vascular disease by means of katz index of activities of daily living. Scand J Caring Sci. 1999;13(4):234–239.
  • Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1627–1634.
  • Penta M, Thonnard JL, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1038–1042.
  • Lyden P. Using the national institutes of health stroke scale: a cautionary tale. Stroke. 2017;48(2):513–519.
  • Dang M, Ramsaran KD, Street ME, et al. Estimating the accuracy of the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment predictive equations for stroke rehabilitation. Physiother Can. 2011;63(3):334–341.
  • Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):58–63.
  • Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, et al. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1340–1345.
  • Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, et al. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):357–364.
  • Hernandez H, Myers SA, Schieber M, et al. Quantification of daily physical activity and sedentary behavior of claudicating patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;55:112–121.
  • Copeland JL, Esliger DW. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17(1):17–30.
  • Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763–1768.
  • Lee JH, Park JH, Kim YJ. Sensitivity of the accelerometer as a measurement tool for upper extremity movement by stroke patients: a comparison with the action research arm test. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(4):1053–1054.
  • Murphy MAA, Danielsson A, Wipenmyr J, et al. Comparison of accelerometer-based arm, leg and trunk activity at weekdays and weekends during subacute inpatient rehabilitation after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(6):426–433.
  • van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, et al. Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(9):1437–1442.
  • Thrane G, Emaus N, Askim T, et al. Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):299–304.
  • Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, et al. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(5):369–381.
  • Liu W, McCombe Waller S, Kepple TM, et al. Compensatory arm reaching strategies after stroke: induced position analysis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):71–84.
  • Hayward KS, Eng JJ, Boyd LA, et al. Exploring the role of accelerometers in the measurement of real world Upper-Limb use after stroke. Brain Impair. 2016;17(1):16–33.