Self-reported listening effort in adults with and without hearing loss: the Danish version of the Effort Assessment Scale (D-EAS)

References

• McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British society of audiology cognition in hearing special interest group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(7):433–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016;37:5S–27S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CB, Tharpe AM. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(3):573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin PA, Gagné JP. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(3):944–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné JP, Besser J, Lemke U. Behavioral assessment of listening effort using a dual-task paradigm: a review. Vol. 21, trends in hearing. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.; 2017. p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor G, Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, et al. The application of pupillometry in hearing science to assess listening effort. Trends Hear. 2018;22:2331216518799437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle R, Gustafson SJ, Hornsby BWY, et al. Behavioral measures of listening effort in school-age children: examining the effects of signal-to-Noise ratio, hearing loss, and amplification. Ear Hear. 2019;40(2):381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez E, Edmonds BA. A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W, Gatehouse S. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(2):100–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L, Meyer C, Lovelock K, et al. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(S1):S18–S27.
   Google Scholar
• Alhanbali S, Dawes P, Lloyd S, et al. Hearing handicap and speech recognition correlate with self-reported listening effort and fatigue. Ear Hear. 2018;39(3):470–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Jansma EP, et al. Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort: a systematic review. Ear Hear. 2017;38(3):267–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Xu J, Cox R, et al. A comparison of two methods for measuring listening effort as part of an audiologic test battery. Am J Audiol. 2015;24(3):419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises. Ear Hear. 2013;34(3):261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W, Gatehouse S. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2006;45(3):172–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhanbali S, Dawes P, Lloyd S, et al. Self-reported listening-related effort and fatigue in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2017;38(1):e39–48–e48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DA, Zaragoza Domingo S, Hamdache LZ, et al. A good practice guide for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires for different languages and cultures. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(3):161–175. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1393565.29161914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BL, Hendrix SB, Hedges DW, et al. Multivariate analysis for the biobehavioral and social sciences: a graphical approach. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang X. Structural equation modeling: applications using mplus. Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2019. p. 1–512.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 3E. New York (NY): Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Poi BP. From the help desk: some bootstrapping techniques. Stata J. 2004;4(3):312–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Statist Med. 2000;19(9):1141–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Higgins JA. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ WV, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions | cochrane training. UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 5]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10
   Google Scholar
• McGrath S, Zhao XF, Qin ZZ, et al. One-sample aggregate data Meta-analysis of medians. Stat Med. 2019;38(6):969–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath S, Sohn H, Steele R, et al. Meta-analysis of the difference of medians. Biom J. 2020;62(1):69–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernarding C, Strauss DJ, Hannemann R, et al. Neurodynamic evaluation of hearing aid features using EEG correlates of listening effort. Cogn Neurodyn. 2017;11(3):203–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou EM, Ricketts TA. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(12):909–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Dau T, Hjortkjær J. Impact of background noise and sentence complexity on processing demands during sentence comprehension. Front Psychol. 2016;7:345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2014;35(6):600–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W, Hétu R. An ecological approach to disability and handicap in relation to impaired hearing: original paper. Audiology. 1994;33(2):117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banh J, Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK. Age affects responses on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(2):81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard CS, Munro KJ, Plack CJ. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(12):928–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield B, Conetta R, Dockrell J, et al. A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137(1):177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamo SK, Reed NS, McNabney MK, et al. Age-Related hearing loss and the listening environment: communication challenges in a group care setting for older adults. Ann Longterm Care. 2019;27(11):e8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders GH, Echt KV. An overview of dual sensory impairment in older adults: perspectives for rehabilitation. Trends Amplif. 2007;11(4):243–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heine C, Browning CJ. Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(15):763–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BWY. Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(5):1416–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar