4,707
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Predictive validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: a prospective clinimetric study

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 111-116 | Received 19 Jul 2021, Accepted 19 Dec 2021, Published online: 07 Jan 2022

References

  • Eggmann S, Luder G, Verra ML, et al. Functional ability and quality of life in critical illness survivors with intensive care unit acquired weakness: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229725.
  • Hopkins RO, Suchyta MR, Kamdar BB, et al. Instrumental activities of daily living after critical illness: a systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(8):1332–1343.
  • Schefold JC, Wollersheim T, Grunow JJ, et al. Muscular weakness and muscle wasting in the critically ill. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(6):1399–1412.
  • McPeake J, Mikkelsen ME, Quasim T, et al. Return to employment after critical illness and its association with psychosocial outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(10):1304–1311.
  • Zhang L, Hu W, Cai Z, et al. Early mobilization of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223185.
  • Waldauf P, Jiroutková K, Krajčová A, et al. Effects of rehabilitation interventions on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(7):1055–1065.
  • Taito S, Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto Y, et al. Does enhanced physical rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge improve outcomes in patients who received mechanical ventilation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e026075.
  • Major ME, van Nes F, Ramaekers S, et al. Survivors of critical illness and their relatives. A qualitative study on hospital discharge experience. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(11):1405–1413.
  • Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, et al. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):33–41.
  • Eggmann S, Verra ML, Stefanicki V, et al. German version of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx-GE): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2021.1909152.
  • Corner EJ, Hichens LV, Attrill KM, et al. The responsiveness of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study. Burns. 2015;41(2):241–247.
  • Corner EJ, Soni N, Handy JM, et al. Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R55.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
  • Heyland DK, Hopman W, Coo H, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life in survivors of sepsis. Short Form 36: a valid and reliable measure of health-related quality of life. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(11):3599–3605.
  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29–36.
  • Sample size calculation: area under ROC curve. MedCalc Software Ltd; 2021. Available from: https://www.medcalc.org/manual/sample-size-ROC-AUC.php.
  • Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954;41(1–2):133–145.
  • Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 10: further nonparametric methods. Crit Care. 2004;8(3):196–199.
  • Yang T, Li Z, Jiang L, et al. Risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018;138(2):104–114.
  • Milton A, Schandl A, Soliman I, et al. ICU discharge screening for prediction of new-onset physical disability-a multinational cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(6):789–797.
  • Estrup S, Kjer CKW, Vilhelmsen F, et al. Physical function and actigraphy in intensive care survivors-a prospective 3-month follow-up cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(5):647–652.
  • Griffith DM, Salisbury LG, Lee RJ, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life after ICU: importance of patient demographics, previous comorbidity, and severity of illness. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):594–601.
  • Langerud AK, Rustøen T, Småstuen MC, et al. Health-related quality of life in intensive care survivors: associations with social support, comorbidity, and pain interference. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199656.
  • Huang M, Chan KS, Zanni JM, et al. Functional status score for the ICU: an international clinimetric analysis of validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(12):e1155–e1164.
  • Tymkew H, Norris T, Arroyo C, et al. The use of physical therapy ICU assessments to predict discharge home. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(9):1312–1318.
  • Bhandari PM, Levis B, Neupane D, et al. Data-driven methods distort optimal cutoffs and accuracy estimates of depression screening tools: a simulation study using individual participant data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;137:137–147.