Pilot of a dog-walking program to foster and support community inclusion for people with cognitive disabilities

References

• United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; 2006 [cited 2021 Jun 30]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013; [cited 2021 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00392.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Government. Care Act 2014; [cited 2021 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/contents/enacted.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Fisher KR, Purcal C, et al. 2011. Community attitudes to people with disability: scoping project. Canberra (ACT, Australia): Australian Government Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Callaway L, Sloan S, et al. Everyday choice making: outcomes of young people with acquired brain injury after moving from residential aged care to community-based supported accommodation. Brain Impair. 2015;16(3):221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement T, Bigby C. Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: Encouraging inclusion and participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Enticott J, Farnworth L, et al. The use of electronic assistive technology for social networking by people with disability living in shared supported accommodation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliorini C, Enticott J, Callaway L, et al. Community integration questionnaire: outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury and high support needs compared with multiple matched controls. Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1201–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, et al. Changes in care and support needs following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impair. 2009;10(3):295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn N, Marshall J, Togher L, et al. Setting and achieving individualized social communication goals for people with acquired brain injury (ABI) within a group treatment. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(5):828–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi N. Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: Article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(4):792–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrus N, Hall L. Intellectual disability and language disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017;26(3):539–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Bould E, Beadle-Brown J. Conundrums of supported living: the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017;42(4):309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Clement T, Bigby C. Breaking out of a distinct social space: Reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2009;22(3):264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester-Jones R, Carpenter J, Coolen-Schrijner P, et al. The social networks of people with intellectual disabilities living in the community 12 years after resettlement from Long-Stay hospitals. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2006;19(4):285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonschot MM, De Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Community participation of people with an intellectual disabilities: a review of empirical findings. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53(4):303–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Time use following a severe traumatic brain injury. J Occup Sci. 2005;12(2):69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Tate R, Wakim D, Genders M. A systematic review of the efficacy of community-based, leisure/social activity programmes for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 2014;15(3):157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan T, Bishop A, Mckinlay A. Community attitudes toward individuals with traumatic brain inj. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(4):705–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrino N, Hedderich I. Family members of adults with intellectual disability living in residential settings: roles and collaboration with professionals: a review of the literature. Inquiry. 2021;58:004695802199130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstanley J, Simpson G, Tate R, et al. Early indicators and contributors to psychological distress in relatives during rehabilitation following severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal S, Donnelly C, Shin J. Digital storytelling: an innovative tool for practice, education, and research. Occup Ther Health Care. 2015;29(1):54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand C, Stewart K, Rudman DL, et al. Applying the go-along method to enhance understandings of occupation in context. J Occup Sci. 2021;2021:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Sloan S, Winkler DF. Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: Principles of occupational therapy practice. Aust Occ Ther J. 2005;52(3):257–260.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Wiesel I. Mediating community participation: Practice of support workers in initiating, facilitating or disrupting encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015;28(4):307–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I, Bigby C. Mainstream, inclusionary and convivial places: Locating encounter between people with and without intellectual disability. Geographic Rev. 2016;106(2):201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart LA, Hart BL, Bergin B. Socializing effects of service dogs for people with disabilities. Anthrozoös. 1987;1(1):41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Shyne A, Masciulli L, Faustino J, et al. Do service dogs encourage more social interactions between individuals with physical disabilities and nondisabled individuals than pet dogs? J Appl Anim Behav. 2012;5(1):16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bould E, Bigby C, Bennett PC, et al. More people talk to you when you have a dog” – dogs as catalysts for community participation of people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;63(10):833–841.
   Google Scholar
• McNicholas J, Collis G. Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: robustness of the effect. Br J Psychol. 2000;91(1):61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood L, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara M. The pet connection: pets as a conduit forsocial Capital? Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(6):1159–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood L, Martin K, Christian H, et al. The pet factor – companion animals as a conduit for getting to know people, friendship formation and social support. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher M, Muldoon O, Pettigrew J. An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing health and wellbeing. Front Psychol. 2015;1(6):1281.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme. Quarterly reports – Dashboard; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/publications/quarterly-reports.
   Google Scholar
• Mavromaras K, Moskos M, Mahuteau S, et al. Evaluation of the NDIS. Final report. Australia: National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson N, Stancliffe R, Gambin N, et al. A case study about the supported participation of older men with lifelong disability at australian community-based men’s sheds. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;40(4):330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, et al. The risk-of-Bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale: an expanded manual for the critical appraisal of Single-Case reports. Sydney: John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow D, Nock M, Hersen M. Single case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed). UK: Pearson; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs (2nd ed.). New York (NY): Oxford Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tate R, Perdices M. Quantitative data analysis for single-case methods, between-groups designs, and instrument development. Brain Impair. 2018;19(1):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I, Bigby C, Carling-Jenkins R. Do you think I’m stupid?: urban encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities. Urban Stud. 2013;50(12):2391–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton C, Emerson E, Robertson J, et al. The adaptive behavior scale-residential and community (part I): towards the development of a short form. Res Dev Disabil. 2001;22(4):273–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing L, Gould J. Systematic recording of behaviors and skills of retarded and psychotic children. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1978;8(1):79–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly G, Todd J, Simpson G, et al. The overt behaviour scale (OBS): a tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community setting. Brain Inj. 2006;20(3):307–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman MG, Burrow WH, Wolford PL. The Aberrant behavior checklist-community: factor validity and effect of subject variables for adults in group homes. Am J Mental Retard. 1995;100(3):283–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, et al. The community integration questionnaire – revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(3):143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown J, Bigby C, Bould E. Observing practice leadership in intellectual disability services. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015;59(12):1081–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker R, Vannest K, Davis J. Effect size in single case research: a review of nine non-overlap techniques. Behav Modif. 2011;35(4):303–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma HH. An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behav Mod. 2006;30:598–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolov R, Solanas A. Percentage of nonoverlapping corrected data. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1262–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA. Synthesizing single subject studies: Issues and applications. Behav Modif. 1998;22(3):221–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Povee K, Bishop BJ, Roberts LD. The use of photovoice with people with intellectual disabilities: reflections, challenges and opportunities. Disabil Soc. 2014;29(6):893–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar