Identifying and linking prosthetic outcomes to the ICF framework: a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations

References

• Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Theeven PJ, Hemmen B, Brink PR, et al. Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens PM. Physical sciences. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020;44(6):373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, O’Donovan M-A, Doyle A, et al. Environmental barriers, activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by people with major limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(3):278–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, et al. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1314–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(3):1–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fayed N, Cieza A, Edmond Bickenbach J. Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1941–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberg HL, Sandvik L, Ostensjo S. Reliability and applicability of the ICF in coding problems, resources and goals of persons with multiple injuries. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deathe AB, Wolfe DL, Devlin M, et al. Selection of outcome measures in lower extremity amputation rehabilitation: ICF activities. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(18):1455–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke L, Ridgewell E, Shiell A, et al. What outcomes are important to lower-limb prosthesis users and funders? A systematic review, ICF linking and Delphi consensus process [core outcome set]. COMET database: COMET initiative; 2021. Available from: https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1831
   Google Scholar
• Clarke L, Dillon M, Shiell A. Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Assistive products for persons with disability – classification and terminology (ISO 9999), ISO/TC 173/SC 2. Geneva (Switzerland): ISO; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF e-Learning Tool. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.icf-elearning.com/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert JS, Wolfe DL, Miller WC, et al. Outcome measures in amputation rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(19):1541–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S, Kohler F, Gutenbrunner C, et al. The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to classify the factors influencing mobility reported by persons with an amputation: an international study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(4):412–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S, Kohler F, Gutenbrunner C, et al. Mobility in persons with lower extremity amputations and influencing factors: using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to quantify expert views. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(1):88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Kohler F, Dickson H. Systematic review of concepts measured in individuals with lower limb amputation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(3):262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF browser. WHO; 2017 [cited 2020]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/
   Google Scholar
• Gwet KL. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: the definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg (MD): Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van Schaik L, Hoeksema S, Huvers LF, et al. The most important activities of daily functioning: the opinion of persons with lower limb amputation and healthcare professionals differ considerably. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020;43(1):82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, et al. Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):218–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerritsen A, Jacobs M, Henselmans I, et al. Developing a core set of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer: a Delphi survey. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltiel F, Miranda-Gazzola APG, Vitória RO, et al. Linking pelvic floor muscle function terminology to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Phys Ther. 2020;100(9):1659–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar