212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Task and ecologically based assessment of upper-limb passive function before and after botulinum injections in adults with stroke using the Upper-Limb Performance Assessment: French cross-cultural adaptation and feasibility pilot study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1087-1096 | Received 26 Jul 2021, Accepted 13 Mar 2022, Published online: 14 Jun 2022

References

  • Santisteban L, Térémetz M, Bleton J-P, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLOS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792.
  • Barden HLH, Baguley IJ, Nott MT, et al. Measuring task performance after acquired brain injury: construct and concurrent validity of ‘upper limb performance analysis’. Brain Inj. 2015;29(10):1223–1229.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Esquenazi A, et al. A comprehensive person-centered approach to adult spastic paresis: a consensus-based framework. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(4):605–617.
  • Ranka JL, Chapparo C. Motor aspects of upper limb functioning and occupational analysis. In: MacLynette M, O'Toole G, editors. Occupational analysis in practice. West Sussex (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 264–279.
  • Sheean G, Lannin NA, Turner-Stokes L, et al. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-care for upper limb hypertonicity in adults: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(Suppl. 2):74–93.
  • Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:21.
  • Burridge J, Alt Murphy M, Buurke J, et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: what recommendations are made for upper limb assessment? Front Neurol. 2019;10:567.
  • Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):451–461.
  • World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
  • Nott MT, Barden HLH, Chapparo C, et al. Evidence based practice and knowledge translation: a survey of Australian Occupational Therapy Practice with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. Aust Occup Ther J. 2020;67(1):74–82.
  • Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Sohlberg MM, et al. Proposed criteria for appraising Goal Attainment Scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(1):157–170.
  • Andrade C. Internal, external, and ecological validity in research design, conduct, and evaluation. Indian J Psychol Med. 2018;40(5):498–499.
  • Ashford S, Siegert RJ, Alexandrescu R. Rasch measurement: the arm activity measure (ArmA) passive function sub-scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(4):384–390.
  • Reeves M, Lisabeth L, Williams L, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for acute stroke: rationale, methods and future directions. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1549–1556.
  • Essers B, Meyer S, Bruyn ND, et al. Mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function: an eye-catching phenomenon after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1545–1551.
  • Noorkõiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:144.
  • Wissel J, Schelosky LD, Scott J, et al. Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial. J Neurol. 2010;257(7):1067–1072.
  • Barden HLH, Baguley IJ, Nott MT, et al. Quantifying patterns of upper limb motor change following BTX-A injection in adult spasticity management. Brain Inj. 2015;29(12):1452–1459.
  • Rae N, Copley J, Ranka J. The clinical utility of the comparative analysis of performance — motor (CAP-M) for children with cerebral palsy. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73(12):579–588.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1–9.
  • Epstein J, Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):360–369.
  • Villepinte C, Catella E, Martin M, et al. Validation of French upper limb Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment in stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;62(1):35–42.
  • Chapparo C, Ranka J. Occupational performance model (Australia). Occupational Performance Network; 1997.
  • White J, Nott MT, Barr C, et al. Stroke survivors’ occupational performance and cognitive strategy use: a pilot exploration of strengths and difficulties using the perceive recall plan perform system of task analysis. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;83(11):701–709.
  • Bhakta BB. Management of spasticity in stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(2):476–485.
  • Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
  • Tate RL, Perdices M. Single-case experimental designs for clinical research and neurorehabilitation settings: planning, conduct, analysis and reporting. London: Routledge; 2018.
  • Aubin G, Chapparo C, Gélinas I, et al. Use of the perceive, recall, plan and perform system of task analysis for persons with schizophrenia: a preliminary study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(3):189–199.
  • Bottari C, Dutil É, Dassa C, et al. Choosing the most appropriate environment to evaluate independence in everyday activities: home or clinic? Aust Occup Ther J. 2006;53(2):98–106.
  • Krasny-Pacini A, Hiebel J, Pauly F, et al. Goal Attainment Scaling in rehabilitation: a literature-based update; [Internet]; 2013. [cited 2018 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.em-consulte.com/en/article/801515
  • Tate RL, Wakim D, Sigmundsdottir L, et al. Evaluating an intervention to increase meaningful activity after severe traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design with direct inter-subject and systematic replications. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(4):641–672.
  • Tardieu G, Shentoub S, Delarue R. A la recherche d’une technique de mesure de la spasticité. Rev Neurol. 1954;91:143–144.
  • Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
  • Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, et al. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):845–850. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0834-1.
  • Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90.
  • Ashford S, Slade M, Turner-Stokes L. Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(18):1513–1518.
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
  • Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, et al. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial Spec Educ. 2012;34(1):26–38.
  • Bulté I, Onghena P. The single-case data analysis package: analysing single-case experiments with R software. J Mod App Stat Meth. 2013;12(2):450–478.
  • Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL, et al. Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav Ther. 2011;42(2):284–299.
  • Vannest KJ, Ninci J. Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. J Couns Dev. 2015;93(4):403–411.
  • Vannest KJ, Parker RI, Gonen O, et al. Single case research: web based calculators for SCR analysis (version 2.0); 2016.
  • Nott MT, Chapparo C, Heard R. Effective occupational therapy intervention with adults demonstrating agitation during post-traumatic amnesia. Brain Inj. 2008;22(9):669–683.
  • Lane JD, Gast DL. Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):445–463.
  • Mokkink LB, Boers M, van der Vleuten CPM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):293.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310.
  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–1039.
  • Villepinte C, Verma A, Dimeglio C, et al. Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;64(2):101366.
  • Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18(5):377–382.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.