Test–retest reliabilities and minimal detectable changes of 5 versions of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale in people with dementia

References

• Hugo J, Ganguli M. Dementia and cognitive impairment: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(3):421–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoe J, Hancock G, Livingston G, et al. Changes in the quality of life of people with dementia living in care homes. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(3):285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi A, Fukuda A, Teng L, et al. Family caregiving in dementia and its impact on quality of life and economic burden in Japan-web based survey. J Market Access Health Policy. 2020;8(1):1720068.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall GA, Amariglio RE, Sperling RA, et al. Activities of daily living: where do they fit in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease? Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2012;2(5):483–491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kueper JK, Speechley M, Montero-Odasso M. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog): modifications and responsiveness in pre-dementia populations. A narrative review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(2):423–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(11):1356–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihl R, Grass-Kapanke B, Janner M, et al. Neuropsychometric tests in cross sectional and longitudinal studies – a regression analysis of ADAS – cog, SKT and MMSE. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1999;32(6):248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyer G, Erzigkeit H, Kanowski S, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: reliability and validity in a multicenter clinical trial. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(2):123–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cano SJ, Posner HB, Moline ML, et al. The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(12):1363–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwalker S, Overall JE, Srirama MK, et al. Cardinal features of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: a factor-analytic study of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1996;9(1):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesnes KA. Assessing change in cognitive function in dementia: the relative utilities of the Alzheimer's disease assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the cognitive drug research system. Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5(3–4):261–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning CA, Ducharme JK. Chapter 6 – dementia syndromes in the older adult. In: Lichtenberg PA, editor. Handbook of assessment in clinical gerontology. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010. p. 155–178.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters H, van Gool WA, Schmand B, et al. Revising the ADAS-cog for a more accurate assessment of cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(3):236–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86(5):735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels C, Wegrzyn M, Wiedl A, et al. Practice effects in healthy adults: a longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11(1):118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainal NH, Silva E, Lim L, et al. Psychometric properties of Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale for mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease patients in an Asian context. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2016;45:273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podhorna J, Krahnke T, Shear M, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale variants in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: change over time and the effect of enrichment strategies. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub S, Wicklund AH, Salmon DP. The neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(4):a006171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihl R, Ferris S, Robert P, et al. Detecting treatment effects with combinations of the ADAS-cog items in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin DB, Flynn S, Mare M, et al. Reliability and validity of a chronic care facility adaptation of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16(8):745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-N, Liu H-C. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Chinese version. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2003;12(3):154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C-Y, Hua M-S, Chiu M-J, et al. The comparison between Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) in evaluating patients with Alzheimer's disease. Taiwan Soc Psychiatry. 2003;17(1):23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lim WS, Chong MS, Sahadevan S. Utility of the Clinical Dementia Rating in Asian populations. Clin Med Res. 2007;5(1):61–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley Sons; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt N, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1145–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhapola V, Kanwal SK, Brar R. Reporting standards for Bland–Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52(Pt 3):382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu LW, Chiu KC, Hui SL, et al. The reliability and validity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) among the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000;29(4):474–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Halloran JP, Kemp AS, Salmon DP, et al. Psychometric comparison of standard and computerized administration of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Cognitive Subscale (ADASCog). Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011;8(3):323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar