How to strengthen the RTW process and collaboration between patients with chronic pain and their employers in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs? Patients’ experiences of the Demand and Ability Protocol

References

• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark and Sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietila-Holmner E, Enthoven P, Gerdle B, et al. Long-term outcomes of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic pain. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(2):jrm00023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson E, Lexell J, Rivano-Fischer M, et al. Everyday occupational problems perceived by participants in a pain rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(4):306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidwall U. Sick leave diagnoses and return to work: a swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):396–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R. Kielhofner's model of human occupation: theory and application. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, et al. Returning to work - a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal l pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, et al. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbiere M, Mazaniello-Chezol M, Bastien MF, et al. Stakeholders' role and actions in the return-to-Work process of workers on Sick-Leave due to common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(3):381–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Svensson T, Ekberg K. From cooperation to conflict? Swedish rehabilitation professionals' experiences of interorganizational cooperation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Corbiere M, Coutu MF, et al. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oakman J, Neupane S, Proper KI, et al. Workplace interventions to improve work ability: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of their effectiveness. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(2):134–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD006955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-Work for musculoskeletal, Pain-Related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrzynek PA, Wainwright E, Ravalier J. Return to work interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review. Occup Med. 2020;70(4):268–277.
   Google Scholar
• Grant M, OB-E J, Froud R, et al. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a Meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedberg GM, Bjork M, Dragioti E, et al. Qualitative evidence from studies of interventions aimed at return to work and staying at work for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. JCM. 2021;10(6):1247.
   Google Scholar
• Dol M, Varatharajan S, Neiterman E, et al. Systematic review of the impact on return to work of return-to-Work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(4):675–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskilsson T, Norlund S, Lehti A, et al. Enhanced capacity to act: managers' perspectives when participating in a dialogue-based workplace intervention for employee return to work . J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):263–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Asaba E, et al. Being a co-worker or a manager of a colleague returning to work after stroke: a challenge facilitated by cooperation and flexibility. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanholm F, Liedberg GM, Lofgren M, et al. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program - a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(5):736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Hellman T, Engblom M, et al. Coordination of return-to-work for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: facilitators and barriers. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;5:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Keus van de Poll M, Nybergh L, Lornudd C, et al. Preventing sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a problem-solving-based intervention conducted by the occupational health services. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(7):454–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pii KH, Hybholt L, Poulsen RM, et al. Shared decision making in an integrated mental health and vocational rehabilitation intervention: stakeholder practices and experiences. Int J Integr Care. 2020;20(4):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromback M, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Keisu S, et al. Restoring confidence in return to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with exhaustion disorder after a dialogue-based workplace intervention. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0234897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennehed CP, Holmberg S, Axen I, et al. Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Pain. 2018;159(8):1456–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbers M, Furulund P. Funksjonsvurdering på arbeidsplassen, et hjelpemiddel ved spesialvurdering i regi av bedriftshelsetjenesten. Test av krav og funksjonsskjema i praxis. Slutrapport till NHO arbetsmiljöfondet projekt S-2387. Oslo. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Polit D, Beck C. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9 ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: www.iasp.org
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ohman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(5):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jonsson H, Johansson U, et al. Connecting rehabilitation and everyday life-the lived experiences among women with stress-related ill health . Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(21):1790–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Johansson U, et al. Experiences of the return to work process after stroke while participating in a person-centred rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(5):349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liethof W. Utvärdering av” krav och funktionsschema”, en ny metod för bedömning av arbetsförmåga för företagshälsovården. [demand and ability protocol – a new method for work ability assessment in occupational health services]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nybergh L, Bergstrom G, Hellman T. Do work- and home-related demands and resources differ between women and men during return-to-work? A focus group study among employees with common mental disorders. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen J. From work ability research to implementation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(16):2882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Lubinsky J. Rehabilitation research: principles and applications. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson R. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998;2(2):175–200.
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg S, Arnell L. Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – a research review of the use of digital interviews. Int J Soc Res Method. 2021. DOI:10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar