Upper extremity self-efficacy correlates with daily hand-use of individuals with high functional capacity post-stroke

References

• Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18(1):43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, et al. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JC. Planning of unconstrained reach actions after unilateral sensorimotor stroke [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Southern California; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(1):76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Predicting daily-use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(20):1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Gill TJ, Brauer SG. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(13):981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Müller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(6):624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(12):1726–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104(2):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Overcoming learned nonuse a new approach to treatment in physical medicine. In: Clinical applied psychophysiology. Boston (MA): Springer; 1994. p. 185–220.
   Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E. Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraint-induced movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(1):34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Varghese R, Stoll H, et al. Predictors of arm nonuse in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(6):512–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43(2):152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1976;4:335–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D. Proprioception deficits in chronic stroke-upper extremity function and daily living. PLOS One. 2018;13(3):e0195043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Tuke A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15(2):81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage M, Polatajko H. Enhancing occupational performance through an understanding of perceived self-efficacy. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48(5):452–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite R, Winstein CJ, Lane CJ, et al. Accelerating stroke recovery: body structures and functions, activities, participation, and quality of life outcomes from a large rehabilitation trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(2):150–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York (NY): WH Freeman and Co; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, et al. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(5):202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost Y, Weingarden H, Zeilig G, et al. Self-care self-efficacy correlates with independence in basic activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(7):1649–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Smith G. Self-efficacy and quality of life after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs. 2002;34:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lewthwaite R, Schweighofer N, et al. Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):116–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi A. Effects of number of repetitions and number of hours of shaping practice during constraint-induced movement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Res Int. 2018;2018:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JC, Lewthwaite R, Rocktashel J, et al. Self-efficacy and reach performance in individuals with mild motor impairment due to stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(4):319–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin LF, Hayward K, Brauer SG. Factors influencing paretic upper limb use during first four-weeks post-stroke: a cross-sectional accelerometry study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(2):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell KJ, Tabak RG, Strube MJ, et al. Belief, confidence, and motivation to use the paretic upper limb in daily life over the first 24 weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(4):197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugg K, Müller S, Winstein C, et al. Does action observation training with immediate physical practice improve hemiparetic upper-limb function in chronic stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(9):807–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27(2):107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, et al. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1386–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Backman CL, et al. Rating of everyday arm-use in the community and home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: development, reliability, and validity. PLOS One. 2013;8(12):e83405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite R, Blanton S, Zerigue A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement (CAHM) scale. In preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Liao WW, McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Kinect-based individualized upper extremity rehabilitation is effective and feasible for individuals with stroke using a transition from clinic to home protocol. Cogent Med. 2018;5(1):1428038.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott RJ, Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Stroke. 1982;13(5):641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenbaum RM, Jones LA. The assessment and treatment of patients who have sensory loss following cortical lesions. J Hand Ther. 1993;6(2):130–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell B, Dehlin O. Mini mental state examination in geriatric stroke patients. Validity, differences between subgroups of patients, and relationships to somatic and mental variables. Aging. 2000;12(6):439–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh NV, Kersel DA. Screening tests for visual neglect following stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1993;3(3):245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran VS. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Conscious Cogn. 1995;4(1):22–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin F-S. ZieleTny M, et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore (MD): Brookes; 1987. p. 115–150.
   Google Scholar
• Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y, et al. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(6):513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett DG, Wright TA. Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika. 2000;65(1):23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, et al. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann M, Vaughan BJ. Commentary: statistical significance and clinical significance – a call to consider patient reported outcome measures, effect size, confidence interval and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(4):690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JC, Cramer SC. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1111–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden AL, Peper CL, Beek PJ, et al. Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(23):1961–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers B, Meyer S, De Bruyn N, et al. Mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function: an eye-catching phenomenon after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1545–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis A, Bosnell R, Dawes H, et al. Cognitive context determines dorsal premotor cortical activity during hand movement in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1056–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1982;13(3):195–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmaied Assadi S, Barel H, Dudkiewicz I, et al. Less-Affected hand function is associated with independence in daily living: a longitudinal study poststroke. Stroke. 2022;53(3):939–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorowitz RD, Gross E, Polinski DM. The stroke survivor. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(13):666–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew James G, Lu ZL, VanMeter JW, et al. Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(4):270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar