Cross-cultural translation and validation of the traumatic injuries distress scale – Spanish version

References

• Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
   Google Scholar
• Manderlier A, de Fooz M, Patris S, et al. Modifiable lifestyle-related prognostic factors for the onset of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;65(6):101660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JJ, Tricco AC, Côté P, et al. Association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(5):1233–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwoerd M, Wittink H, Maissan F, et al. Prognostic factors for persistent pain after a first episode of nonspecific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;42:13–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramond-Roquin A, Bouton C, Gobin-Tempereau AS, et al. Interventions focusing on psychosocial risk factors for patients with non-chronic low back pain in primary care–a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2014;31(4):379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling M, Smeets R, Keijzers G, et al. Physiotherapist-delivered stress inoculation training integrated with exercise versus physiotherapy exercise alone for acute whiplash-associated disorder (StressModex): a randomised controlled trial of a combined psychological/physical intervention. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(19):1240–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Main CJ, et al. Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT back tool with the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(1):83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):38–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DM, Krebs D, Moulden D, et al. The traumatic injuries distress scale: a new tool that quantifies distress and has predictive validity with patient-reported outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(10):920–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DM, Elliott JM, Lee J, et al. Identification of clinically-useful cut scores of the traumatic injuries distress scale (TIDS) for predicting rate of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma. Simmen H-P, ed. PLOS One. 2021;16(3):e0248745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soer R, Vroomen P, Stewart R, et al. Factor analyses for the örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire for working and nonworking patients with chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2017;17(4):603–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an International Delphi Study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics LI. Provo, Utah, USA. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• de Andrés Ares J, Cruces Prado LM, Canos Verdecho MA, et al. Validation of the short form of the brief pain inventory (BPI-SF) in Spanish patients with non-cancer-related pain. Pain Pract. 2014;15(7):643–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, et al. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004;5(2):133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DMDM, Beattie T, Putos J, et al. A Rasch analysis of the brief pain inventory interference subscale reveals three dimensions and an age bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;74:218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. New light on the correlation coefficient and its transforms. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1953;15(2):193–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper DS. A-priori sample size calculator for multiple regression (software). Available from: https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx
   Google Scholar
• G S. Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach’s alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(3):150–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005;114(1–2):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green AS, Rafaeli E, Bolger N, et al. Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychol Methods. 2006;11(1):87–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan JYC, Kwong JSW, Wong A, et al. Comparison of computerized and paper-and-pencil memory tests in detection of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(9):748–756.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar