1,670
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists’ practice: a review of systematic reviews to map barriers and facilitators and identify specific behavior change techniques

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2263-2272 | Received 05 Oct 2021, Accepted 19 Jun 2022, Published online: 05 Jul 2022

References

  • Pincus T, Kent P, Bronfort G, et al. Twenty-Five years with the biopsychosocial model of low back pain—is It time to celebrate? A report from the twelfth international forum for primary care research on low back pain. Spine. 2013;38(24):2118–2123.
  • Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Pain Forum. 1996;5(1):3–11.
  • Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul Van Wilgen C, et al. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: Therapists' and patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013;18(2):96–102.
  • Alhowimel A, Alotaibi M, Radford K, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with change in pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated by physiotherapist: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118757387.
  • Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811–816.
  • Darlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S, et al. The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(1):3–17.
  • Domenech J, Sánchez-Zuriaga D, Segura-Ortí E, et al. Impact of biomedical and biopsychosocial training sessions on the attitudes, beliefs, and recommendations of health care providers about low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Pain. 2011;152(11):2557–2563.
  • Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2791–2803.
  • Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136.
  • Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(2):79–86.
  • Twomey D, Stuart S, Baker K. Pain in parkinson's disease: the lived experience. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2018;25(6):301–308.
  • Andrade PMO, Haase VG, Oliveira-Ferreira F. An ICF-based approach for cerebral palsy from a biopsychosocial perspective. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(6):391–400.
  • Pétrin J, Donnelly C, McColl MA, et al. Is it worth it?: the experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis as they access health care to manage their condition. Health Expect. 2020;23(5):1269–1279.
  • Gallagher J, Parenti G, Doyle F. Psychological aspects of cardiac care and rehabilitation: Time to wake up to sleep? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(12):111.
  • BACPR Standrads Wrtiing Group. Standards and Core Components in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation. In: Jones J, Buckley J, Furze G, et al. editors. Cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation in practice. London, UK:. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2020. p. 21–45.
  • Miaskowski C, Blyth F, Nicosia F, et al. A biopsychosocial model of chronic pain for older adults. Pain Med. 2020;21(9):1793–1805.
  • Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman A, Epstein R. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576–582.
  • Holopainen R. Biopsychosocial framework – pain impacting life on multiple biopsychosocial domains. Euro J Physiother. 2021;23(5):268–269.
  • Driver C, Oprescu F, Lovell GP. Exploring physiotherapists' considerations regarding the use of psychosocial strategies in practice. Physiother Res Int. 2019;24(4):e1783.
  • Main CJ, George SZ. Psychologically informed practice for management of low back pain: future directions in practice and research. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):820–824.
  • Holopainen R. Exploring the meaning of the biopsychosocial approach in the management of musculoskeletal conditions patients’ and physiotherapists’ perspective. Finland: University of Jyväskylä; 2021.
  • NICE. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London. 2016.
  • APS. Guidelines for the management of acute whiplash-associated disorders- for health professionals. 3rd ed. State Insurance Regulatory Authority, Sydney. 2014.
  • RACGP. Guideline for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis. 2nd ed. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. 2018.
  • Kobylańska M, Kowalska J, Neustein J, et al. The role of biopsychosocial factors in the rehabilitation process of individuals with a stroke. Work. 2018;61(4):523–535.
  • Van Erp RMA, Huijnen IPJ, Jakobs MLG, et al. Effectiveness of primary care interventions using a biopsychosocial approach in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain Pract. 2019;19(2):224–241.
  • Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350(feb18 5):h444.
  • O'Sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(4):224–227.
  • Foster NE, Delitto A. Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: Integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice—challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):790–803.
  • Sanders T, Foster NE, Bishop A, et al. Biopsychosocial care and the physiotherapy encounter: physiotherapists’ accounts of back pain consultations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):65.
  • Alexanders J, Anderson A, Henderson S. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ use of psychological interventions: a systematic review of therapists’ perceptions and practice. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):95–102.
  • Jeffrey JE, Foster NE. A qualitative investigation of physical therapists' experiences and feelings of managing patients with nonspecific low back pain. Phys Ther. 2012;92(2):266–278.
  • Alshehri MA, Alzahrani H, Alotaibi M, et al. Physiotherapists’ pain attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain and their association with treatment selection: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e037159.
  • Simpson P, Holopainen R, Schütze R, et al. Training of physical therapists to deliver individualized biopsychosocial interventions to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a scoping review. Physical Therapy. 2021;101(10):pzab188.
  • Keefe FJ, Main CJ, George SZ. Advancing psychologically informed practice for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain: Promise, pitfalls, and solutions. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):398–407.
  • Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–1230.
  • Cowell I, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K, et al. Perceptions of physiotherapists towards the management of non-specific chronic low back pain from a biopsychosocial perspective: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;38:113–119.
  • França AA, Santos VD, Filho RL, et al. It's very complicated’: Perspectives and beliefs of newly graduated physiotherapists about the biopsychosocial model for treating people experiencing non-specific low back pain in Brazil. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;42:84–89.
  • Gardner T, Refshauge K, Smith L, et al. Physiotherapists’ beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Physiother. 2017;63(3):132–143.
  • Rothman AJ. Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?": why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1(1):11.
  • French SD, Green SE, O'Connor DA, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):38.
  • ICEBeRG Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):4.
  • Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Psychological Theory Group, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.
  • Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.
  • Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Sci. 2017;12(1):77.
  • Francis JJ, O'Connor D, Curran J. Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):35.
  • AL Zoubi FM, French SD, Patey AM, et al. Professional barriers and facilitators to using stratified care approaches for managing non-specific low back pain: a qualitative study with Canadian physiotherapists and chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019;27(1):68.
  • Richmond H, Hall AM, Hansen Z, et al. Exploring physiotherapists' experiences of implementing a cognitive behavioural approach for managing low back pain and identifying barriers to long-term implementation. Physiotherapy. 2018;104(1):107–115.
  • Willett M, Greig C, Fenton S, et al. Utilising the perspectives of patients with lower-limb osteoarthritis on prescribed physical activity to develop a theoretically informed physiotherapy intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):155.
  • Human Behaviour-Change Project London: Centre for Behaviour Change - University College London. 2021. https://www.humanbehaviourchange.org/
  • Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
  • Lorenz RC, Matthias K, Pieper D, et al. A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;114:133–140.
  • Hall AM, Scurrey SR, Pike AE, et al. Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the theoretical domains framework. Implementation Sci. 2019;14(1):49.
  • Little EA, Presseau J, Eccles MP. Understanding effects in reviews of implementation interventions using the theoretical domains framework. Implementation Sci. 2015;10(1):90.
  • Theory and Technique Tool: British Websites. 2021. https://theoryandtechniquetool.humanbehaviourchange.org/
  • BCT Theory. How can I use the Theory & Techniques tool?: British websites. 2021. https://theoryandtechniquetool.humanbehaviourchange.org/how-to-use
  • Michie S, Johnston M, Rothman AJ, et al. Developing an evidence-based online method of linking behaviour change techniques and theoretical mechanisms of action: a multiple methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2021;9(1):1–168.
  • Holopainen R, Simpson P, Piirainen A, et al. Physiotherapists' perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Pain. 2020;161(6):1150–1168.
  • Driver C, Kean B, Oprescu F, et al. Knowledge, behaviors, attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists towards the use of psychological interventions in physiotherapy practice: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(22):2237–2249.
  • Synnott A, O'Keeffe M, Bunzli S, et al. Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015;61(2):68–76.
  • Gray H, Howe T. Physiotherapists’ assessment and management of psychosocial factors (Yellow and Blue Flags) in individuals with back pain. 2013.
  • Heslehurst N, Newham J, Maniatopoulos G, et al. Implementation of pregnancy weight management and obesity guidelines: a Meta-synthesis of healthcare professionals' barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework. Obes Rev. 2014;15(6):462–486.
  • Nathan N, Elton B, Babic M, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of physical activity policies in schools: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2018;107:45–53.
  • Seward K, Finch M, Yoong SL, et al. Factors that influence the implementation of dietary guidelines regarding food provision in Centre based childcare services: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2017;105:197–205.
  • Ng W, Slater H, Starcevich C, et al. Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Pain. 2021;162(8):2154–2185.
  • Demmelmaier I, Denison E, Lindberg P, et al. Tailored skills training for practitioners to enhance assessment of prognostic factors for persistent and disabling back pain: four quasi-experimental single-subject studies. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(5):359–372.
  • Fritz J, Wallin L, Söderlund A, et al. Implementation of a behavioral medicine approach in physiotherapy: a process evaluation of facilitation methods. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):94.
  • Birken SA, Powell BJ, Presseau J, et al. Combined use of the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) and the theoretical domains framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):2.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.