Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Italian Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper and lower extremity

References

• Thrift AG, Thayabaranathan T, Howard G, et al. Global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(1):13–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: global burden of disease study. Lancet. 1997;349(9064):1498–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(5-6):258–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen HS. The copenhagen stroke study experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996;6(1):5–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1995;7(1):51–91.
   Google Scholar
• Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998;29(4):785–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(4):191–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl J, Held JPO, Verheyden G, et al. Consensus-based core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke – a Delphi study. Front Neurol. 2020;11:875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prange-Lasonder GB, Alt Murphy M, Lamers I, et al. European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation (CAULIN): data synthesis from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santisteban L, Térémetz M, Bleton JP, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1787–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell C, Bettger JP, Cockroft KM, et al. Chronic stroke outcome measures for motor function intervention trials: expert panel recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:S163–S169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Björkdahl A, Forsberg-Wärleby G, et al. Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: from evidence to clinical practice. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(1):jrm00148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, et al. Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales - the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in colombian spanish. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(19):2317–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busk H, Alt Murphy M, Korsman R, et al. Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2021;23:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kim TL, Hwang SH, Lee WJ, et al. The Korean version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment: reliability and validity evaluation. Ann Rehabil Med. 2021;45(2):83–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundquist CB, Maribo T. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the danish version. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(9):934–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazono T, Takahashi K, Suzuki Y, et al. Reliability and validity of japanese version of Fugl-Meyer assessment for the lower extremities. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022;29(2):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikram M, Rehman SSu, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;22:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchi F, Carrabba C, Bertolucci F, et al. Transcultural translation and validation of Fugl-Meyer assessment to italian. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(25):3717–3722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández ED, Forero SM, Galeano CP, et al. Intra- and interrater reliability of Fugl-Meyer assessment of lower extremity early after stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(6):709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):652–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the national institutes of health stroke scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28(2):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, et al. Exploring the reliability of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 2009;40(3):762–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Stat Med. 2012;31(26):3104–3117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdic A, Svenssons ES. method (Version 1.1) Örebro 2010. Interactive software supporting Svenssons method. Available at http://avdic.se/svenssonsmetod.html. 2015-08-14. [Accessed on 06 Dec 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med. 1994;13(23-24):2437–2453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10(1):141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, EPOS Investigators, et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaziani E, Couppé C, Siersma V, et al. Easily conducted tests During the first week post-stroke can aid the prediction of arm functioning at 6 months. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42(2):427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(1):47–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar