Measuring psychological, cognitive, and social domains of physical literacy in school-aged children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a systematic review and decision tree

References

• Dimsdale JE, Levenson J, Sharpe M. Differing perspectives on diagnostic proposals for the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition. J Psychosom Res. 2011;/70(6):496–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arim RG, Findlay LC, Kohen DE. Participation in physical activity for children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:460384–460384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss RS, Rodzilsky D, Burack G, et al. Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in healthy children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(8):897–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boreham C, Riddoch C. The physical activity, fitness and health of children. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(12):915–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley D, Keegan R, Barnett L. Physical Literacy: Informing a Definition and Standard for Australia; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sport Australia. Australian physical literacy framework. Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia Sports Commission; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Taub DE, Greer KR. Physical activity as a normalizing experience for school-age children with physical disabilities: implications for legitimation of social identity and enhancement of social ties. J Sport Soc Issues. 2000;24(4):395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy N, Carbone P, American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children With Disabilities. Promoting the participation of children with disabilities in sports, recreation, and physical activities. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):1057–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck GL, Auld ML, Johnston LM. SPORTS STARS: a practitioner-led, peer-group sports intervention for ambulant, school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Parent and physiotherapist perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(6):956–965.
   Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck GL, Auld ML, Johnston LM. High-level motor skills assessment for ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and decision tree. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(6):693–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L, Boyd R, Ziviani J. Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon N, Thorpe D, Balemans AC, et al. The clinimetric properties of aerobic and anaerobic fitness measures in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;45–46:316–28328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater LM, Hillier SL, Civetta LR. The clinimetric properties of performance-based gross motor tests used for children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic review. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(2):170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckson EA, Curtis A. Measuring physical activity in children and youth living with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(1):72–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaro DL, Bidonde J, Kane KJ, et al. Past and current use of walking measures for children with spina bifida: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(8):1533–1543.e31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, et al. Measuring’ physical literacy and related constructs: a systematic review of empirical findings. Sports Med. 2018;48(3):659–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reedman S, Boyd RN, Sakzewski L. The efficacy of interventions to increase physical activity participation of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(10):1011–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg HR, Kives S, Allen L, et al. Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses in the pediatric and adolescent population: evaluating the decision tree system. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(6):633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distinguin L, Blanchard M, Rouillon I, et al. Pediatric cochlear reimplantation: decision-tree efficacy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(4):243–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phakhounthong K, Chaovalit P, Jittamala P, et al. Predicting the severity of dengue fever in children on admission based on clinical features and laboratory indicators: application of classification tree analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-Analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Outcome measures rating form. Ontario, Canada: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck G, Auld M, Johnston LM. Active exercise interventions improve gross motor function of ambulant/semi-ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2018:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck GL, Auld ML, Johnston LM. SPORTS STARS: a practitioner-led, peer-group sports intervention for ambulant children with cerebral palsy. Activity and participation outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(6):947–955.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, GRADE Working Group, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DJ, Veneri DA. Development and acceptability testing of decision trees for self-management of prosthetic socket fit in adults with lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(9):1066–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Oest MJW, Porsius JT, MacDermid JC, et al. Item reduction of the patient-rated wrist evaluation using decision tree modelling. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(19):2758–2765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, et al. Test review behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol. 2000;6(3):235–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Busch Rossnagel N, Barrett K, et al. The dimensions of mastery questionnaire (DMQ 17): A Manual About Its Development, Psychometrics, and Use. 2014. 01/01.
   Google Scholar
• Downs J, Jacoby P, Leonard H, et al. Psychometric properties of the quality of life inventory-disability (QI-Disability) measure. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(3):783–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman NC, Gray KM, Taffe JR, et al. Development of a new attention rating scale for children with intellectual disability: the scale of attention in intellectual disability (SAID). Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;120(2):91–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang EM, Gillespie EF, Shaverdian N. Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:171–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Wang J, Barrett K, et al. The Revised Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ 18), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Shikako-Thomas K, Shevell M, Schmitz N, QUALA Group, et al. Determinants of participation in leisure activities among adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(9):2621–2634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L, Ziviani J, Ware RS, et al. Mastery motivation: a way of understanding therapy outcomes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(16):1439–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, Law M, King S, et al. Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33(1):28–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo E, Badia M, Orgaz B, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the children’s assessment of participation and enjoyment (CAPE) in Spain. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40(2):231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein A, Williams K, Reddihough D, et al. Content validation of the quality of life inventory-disability. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(5):654–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby P, Epstein A, Kim R, et al. Reliability of the quality of life inventory-disability measure in children with intellectual disability. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020;41(7):534–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa Y, Rosenblum S, Fattal-Valevski A, et al. Is there a relationship between executive functions and academic success in children with neurofibromatosis type 1? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(6):918–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk H, Gray K, Ellis K, et al. Impact of attention training on academic achievement, executive functioning, and behavior: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017;122(2):97–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torske T, Naerland T, Øie MG, et al. Metacognitive aspects of executive function are highly associated with social functioning on parent-rated measures in children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:258–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström P, Johnels JÅ, Thorson M, et al. Subjective mental health, peer relations, family, and school environment in adolescents with intellectual developmental disorder: a first report of a new questionnaire administered on tablet PCs. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2016;9(4):207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes A, Gilmore L, Shochet I, et al. Factor analysis of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of children with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(2):847–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen M, Aman MG, Mathiassen B, et al. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian aberrant behavior checklist and diagnostic relationships in a neuro-pediatric sample. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;12(3–4):234–255. 2019/10/31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe B, Wong M, Dossetor D, et al. The association between social skills and mental health in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(8):2487–2496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viecili MA, Weiss JA. Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;120(4):289–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaptein S, Jansen DE, Vogels AG, et al. Mental health problems in children with intellectual disability: use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52 (Pt 2):125–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaiser S, Halvorsen MB. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire self-report-, parent-, and teacher version in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2022;123:104194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giblin S, Collins D, Button C. Physical literacy: importance, assessment and future directions. Sports Med. 2014;44(9):1177–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longmuir PE, Gunnell KE, Barnes JD, et al. Canadian assessment of physical literacy second edition: a streamlined assessment of the capacity for physical activity among children 8 to 12 years of age. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(Suppl 2):1047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lodewyk KR. Early validation evidence of the Canadian practitioner-based assessment of physical literacy in secondary physical education. TPE. 2019;76(3):634–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitoratou S, Pickles A. A note on contemporary psychometrics. J Ment Health. 2017;26(6):486–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Keren O, et al. Balance abilities and gait characteristics in post-traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy and typically developed children. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(2):100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgia CF, Heidi IS, Viviene AT. Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: review and research agenda. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2008;25(2):95–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Hanna S, Anaby D, et al. Health-related quality of life of children with physical disabilities: a longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:26–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderlein G, Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York – Chichester – Brislane – Toronto – Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35. Biom J. 2007;30(3):304–304.
   Google Scholar
• Embregts PJ, du Bois MG, Graef N. Behavior problems in children with mild intellectual disabilities: an initial step towards prevention. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(6):1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall CL, Guo B, Valentine AZ, et al. The validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218518-e0218518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liogier d‘Ardhuy X, Edgin JO, Bouis C, et al. Assessment of cognitive scales to examine memory, executive function and language in individuals with down syndrome: implications of a 6-month observational study. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9(300):300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Durbin DR, CHAT Study Group, et al. The pediatric quality of life inventory: an evaluation of its reliability and validity for children with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(10):1901–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isquith PK, Gioia GA, Espy KA. Executive function in preschool children: examination through everyday behavior. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(1):403–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar