Central Sensitisation Inventory-Thai version: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation in chronic non-specific neck pain

References

• Safiri S, Kolahi A-A, Hoy D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990–2017: systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368:m791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, et al. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1309–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):968–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Abraham J, Ali MK, et al. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton D, Zhang M. Neck pain care pathways and costs: association with the type of initial contact health care provider. A retrospective cohort study. medRxiv; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman B. Total of 137 million working days lost to sickness and injury in 2016. UK Office for National Statistics; 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/news/totalof137millionworkingdayslosttosicknessandinjuryin2016
   Google Scholar
• Phithaksilp M. Non-specific neck pain: guideline for assessment, diagnosis and treatment in primary medical care. JHS. 2016;25:760–768.
   Google Scholar
• Sá S, Silva AG. Repositioning error, pressure pain threshold, catastrophizing and anxiety in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;30:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Boer C, Dries L, Terluin B, et al. Central sensitization in chronic pain and medically unexplained symptom research: a systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments. J Psychosom Res. 2019;117:32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harte SE, Harris RE, Clauw DJ. The neurobiology of central sensitization. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2018;23:e12137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblett R. The Central Sensitization Inventory: a user’s manual. J Appl Behav Res. 2018;23(2):e12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, et al. The development and psychometric validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2012;12(4):276–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute M, Laekeman M, Kuss K, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-GE). Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilika P, Neblett R, Georgoudis G, et al. Cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2020;20(2):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kregel J, Vuijk PJ, Descheemaeker F, et al. The Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): factor analysis, discriminative power, and test–retest reliability. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(7):624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldan-Jimenez C, Neblett R, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish Central Sensitization Inventory. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiarotto A, Viti C, Sulli A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Italian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;37:20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerbo T, Colasurdo J, Dunn S, et al. Measurement properties of the Central Sensitization Inventory: a systematic review. Pain Pract. 2018;18(4):544–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblett R, Hartzell MM, Mayer TG, et al. Establishing clinically relevant severity levels for the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2017;17(2):166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun D, Zoe M, Johnston V, et al. Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(5):373–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the Visual Analog Scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(12):1153–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reips U-D, Funke F. Interval-level measurement with Visual Analogue Scales in internet-based research: VAS generator. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):699–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uthaikhup S, Paungmali A, Pirunsan U. Validation of Thai versions of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21):E1415–E1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, et al. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiangkham T, Phungwattanakul N, Tedsombun P, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with non-specific neck pain. Scand J Pain. 2021;21(2):247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngcharoen P, Aree-Ue S, Saraboon Y. Validation of Pain Catastrophizing Scale Thai version in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Innov Aging. 2017;1(Suppl. 1):871–871.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3130–3139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LL, Seubsman S-A, Sleigh A. Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Neblett R, Chiarotto A, et al. Dimensionality and reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a pooled multicountry sample. J Pain. 2018;19(3):317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Reise SP. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47(5):667–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments; 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Roebroeck M, Lankhorst G, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988. p. 467–530.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Jha J, Pathak A, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Nishigami T, Mibu A, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. PLOS One. 2017;12(12):e0188719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caumo W, Antunes LC, Elkfury JL, et al. The Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2109–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltran-Alacreu H, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Calvo-Lobo C, et al. Clinical features of patients with chronic non-specific neck pain per disability level: a novel observational study. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018;64(8):700–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers MR, Creger RV, Baker CV, et al. The use of fear-avoidance beliefs and nonorganic signs in predicting prolonged disability in patients with neck pain. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):239–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SJ, Lee R, Yoon DM, et al. Factors associated with increased risk for pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic neck pain: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2016;95(37):e4698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, et al. PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(12):921–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000. p. 160–164.
   Google Scholar
• Phungwattanakul N, Boonyapo U, Wiangkham T. Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the modified STarT back screening tool in individuals with neck pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bid Dibyendunarayan D, Soni Neela C, Rathod Priyanshu V, et al. Content validity and test–retest reliability of the Gujarati version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2016;7:18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Knezevic A, Neblett R, Jeremic‐Knezevic M, et al. Cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Serbian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2018;18(4):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitance L, Piraux E, Lannoy B, et al. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the French version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Man Ther. 2016;25:83.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Ferreira-Valente A, de C, et al. Group differences between countries and between languages in pain-related beliefs, coping, and catastrophizing in chronic pain: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2020;21(9):1847–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoMartire R, Äng BO, Gerdle B, et al. Psychometric properties of short form-36 health survey, EuroQol 5-dimensions, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2020;161(1):83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, et al. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(1):84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar