Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of diabetes-39 in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes

References

• Wexler D, Grant R, Wittenberg E, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49(7):1489–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, TURDEP-II Study Group, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redekop WK, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk RP, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):458–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer JG, Earp JAL. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes: diabetes-39. Med Care. 1997;35(5):440–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd A, Keech M, Boyer J, editors. Validation of the Diabetes-39 disease specific quality of life instrument in Danish, Finnish, Norwegian & Swedish. 175 Fifth Ave, New York NY 10010: Springer Verlag; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wändell PE. Quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus an overview of research in primary health care in the nordic countries. Scand J Prim Heal Care. 2005;23(2):68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz FA, Pace AE, Santos CB. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the instrument Diabetes – 39 (D-39): Brazilian version for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients – stage 1. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009;17(5):708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulian LR, Santos M, Veras VS, et al. Quality of life in patients with diabetes using the Diabetes 39 (D-39) instrument. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013;34(3):138–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khader YS, Bataineh S, Batayha W. The arabic version of Diabetes-39: psychometric properties and validation. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(4):257–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López-Carmona JM, Rodríguez-Moctezuma R. Adaptation and validation of quality of life instrument diabetes 39 for Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48(3):200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocyigit H. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form-36 (SF-36): a study in a group of patients will rheumatic diseases. Turk J Drugs Ther. 1999;12:102–106.
   Google Scholar
• Framework IC. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. American diabetes association: tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(Suppl 1): S897–S9.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Does FE, De Neeling JND, Snoek FJ, et al. Symptoms and well-being in relation to glycemic control in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(3):204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundation of clinical research: application to practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Book review: psychometric theory. 3rd ed. J Psychoeduc Assess. 1999;17(3):275–280.
   Google Scholar
• El Achhab Y, Nejjari C, Chikri M, et al. Disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(2):171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adarmouch L, Sebbani M, Elansari N, Community Medicine and Public Health Department, PCIME Laboratory, School of Medicine, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco, et al. Adaptation and validation of the diabetes-39 quality-of-life questionnaire for the Moroccan population. Series Endo Diab Met. 2020;2(1):7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Huang I-C, Hwang CC, Wu MY, et al. Diabetes‐specific or generic measures for health‐related quality of life? Evidence from psychometric validation of the D‐39 and SF‐36. Value Health. 2008;11(3):450–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Pyakurel P, Baral DD, et al. Health-related quality of life among people living with type 2 diabetes: a community based cross-sectional study in rural Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uwizihiwe JP, Lygidakis C, Bia M, et al. Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Kinyarwanda version of the diabetes-39 (D-39) questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999;15(3):205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitiyanant W, Chetthakul T, Sang-A-Kad P, et al. A survey study on diabetes management and complication status in primary care setting in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2007;90(1):65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamarul Imran M, Ismail A, Naing L, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with poor glycaemic control have lower quality of life scores as measured by the short form-36. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(2):157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar