Active engagement of managers in employee RTW and manager-employee relationship: managers’ experiences of participating in a dialogue using the Demand and Ability Protocol

References

• Aili K, Campbell P, Michaleff ZA, et al. Long-term trajectories of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a 21-year prospective cohort latent class analysis. Pain. 2021;162(5):1511–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in denmark and sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Insurance Agency. Social Insurance in figures 2021. 2021. https://m.forsakringskassan.se/wps/wcm/connect/11bc72d6-4bbb-4893-8a3b-c9e9eae568f8/social-insurance-in-figures-2021.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=
   Google Scholar
• LoMartire R, Dahlström Ö, Björk M, et al. Predictors of sickness absence in a clinical population with chronic pain. J Pain. 2021;22(10):1180–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-Work for musculoskeletal, Pain-Related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakman J, Neupane S, Proper KI, et al. Workplace interventions to improve work ability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their effectiveness. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(2):134–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennehed CP, Holmberg S, Axén I, et al. Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Pain. 2018;159(8):1456–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Cochrane Work Group, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;5(10):Cd006955.
   Google Scholar
• Liedberg GM, Björk M, Dragioti E, et al. Qualitative evidence from studies of interventions aimed at return to work and staying at work for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. JCM. 2021;10(6):1247.
   Google Scholar
• Nastasia I, Coutu MF, Rives R, et al. Role and responsibilities of supervisors in the sustainable return to work of workers Following a Work-Related musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(1):107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):679–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P, et al. Obstacles to and facilitators of return to work after work-disabling back pain: the workers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):280–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Sandman L, Hellman T, et al. Coordination of return-to-work for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: facilitators and barriers. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2020;5:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck M, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Keisu S, et al. Restoring confidence in return to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with exhaustion disorder after a dialogue-based workplace intervention. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0234897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad A, Svärd V. Patients’ with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties and their views on important professional competence for rehabilitation coordinators in the return-to-Work process. IJERPH. 2021;18(19):10280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svärd V, Friberg E, Azad A. How people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties experience support by rehabilitation coordinators During sickness absence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1245–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Svartengren M, Danielsson K, et al. How to strengthen the RTW process and collaboration between patients with chronic pain and their employers in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs? Patients’ experiences of the Demand and Ability Protocol. Disab Rehabil. 2022;10:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Svanholm F, Liedberg GM, Löfgren M, et al. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program - a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(5):736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Ob-E J, Froud R, et al. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskilsson T, Norlund S, Lehti A, et al. Enhanced capacity to act: managers’ perspectives when participating in a Dialogue-Based workplace intervention for employee return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):263–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peolsson A, Hermansen A, Peterson G, et al. Return to work a bumpy road: a qualitative study on experiences of work ability and work situation in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen K, Lillefjell M. Factors promoting a successful return to work: from an employer and employee perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(1):48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grataloup M, Massardier-Pilonchéry A, Bergeret A, et al. Job restrictions for healthcare workers with musculoskeletal disorders: consequences from the superior’s viewpoint. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Whitt K, Kristman V, Shaw WS, et al. A model of supervisor Decision-Making in the accommodation of workers with low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):366–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Corbière M, Coutu MF, et al. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engbers MF. Funksjonsvurdering på arbeidsplassen, et hjelpemiddel ved spesialvurdering i regi av bedriftshelsetjenesten. Test av Krav og Funksjonsskjema i praxis. Slutrapport till NHO Arbetsmiljöfondet Projekt S-2387. Oslo. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen J. From work ability research to implementation. IJERPH. 2019;16(16):2882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23(Suppl 1):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer S, Dijkstra P, Gerrits E, et al. Intra- en inter-beoordelaarsbetrouwbaarheid ’FIS-belastbaarheidspatroon’ en ‘functionele mogelijkheden lijst’ [English: intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability – Functional Information System and Functional Ability List]. Tijdschrift Voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 2002;11:360–367.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Geneva, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DB. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Doody C, Blake C. Managing low back pain: knowledge and attitudes of hospital managers. Occup Med. 2008;58(4):282–288.
   Google Scholar
• Karlson B, Jönsson P, Pålsson B, et al. Return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout–a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck R, Porteous C, Wynne-Jones G, et al. Challenges to remaining at work with common health problems: what helps and what influence do organisational policies have? J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):501–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen J, Boot CRL, Alma MA, et al. Exploring employer perspectives on their supportive role in accommodating workers with disabilities to promote sustainable RTW: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen J, van Ooijen R, Koning PWC, et al. The role of the employer in supporting work participation of workers with disabilities: a systematic literature review using an interdisciplinary approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(4):916–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunberg S, Arnell L. Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. Inter J Soc Res Methodol. 2022;25(6):757–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar