223
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Geographic intelligence to investigate community participation: a scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 4503-4516 | Received 10 May 2022, Accepted 30 Nov 2022, Published online: 12 Dec 2022

References

  • World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: world Health Organization, 2001.
  • Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(1):29–38.
  • Piškur B, Daniëls R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(3):211–220.
  • Chang FH, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA. Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4):771–781.
  • Salzer MS, Kottsieper P, Brusilovskiy E. Intermethod reliability and factors affecting recall with the Temple University community participation measure. J Ment Health. 2015;24(4):189–195.
  • Chan DV, Mann A, Gopal S. Applying environmental context to rehabilitation research using geographic information systems and global positioning systems geospatial technologies. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2021;35(1):33–50.
  • Fillekes MP, Kim EK, Trumpf R, et al. Assessing older adults’ daily mobility: a comparison of GPS-derived and self-reported mobility indicators. Sensors. 2019;19(20):4551.
  • Clark RA, Weragoda N, Paterson K, et al. A pilot investigation using global positioning systems into the outdoor activity of people with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:37.
  • Brusilovskiy E, Klein LA, Salzer MS. Using global positioning systems to study health-related mobility and participation. Soc Sci Med. 2016;161:134–142.
  • Heatwole Shank KS, Kenley B, Brown S, et al. We need more things for us: being low income and underoccupied in older age. Can J Occup Ther. 2020;87(1):21–29.
  • Mahendran N, Kuys SS, Brauer SG. Accelerometer and global positioning system measurement of recovery of community ambulation across the first 6 months after stroke: an exploratory prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(9):1465–1472.
  • Webber SC, Porter MM. Monitoring mobility in older adults using global positioning system (GPS) watches and accelerometers: a feasibility study. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17(4):455–467.
  • Šimon M, Vašát P, Poláková M, et al. Activity spaces of homeless men and women measured by GPS tracking data: a comparative analysis of Prague and Pilsen. Cities. 2019;86:145–153.
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
  • Mendeley Desktop. Elsevier. Available from: www.elsevier.com/solutions/mendeley.
  • Lonini L, Shawen N, Hoppe-Ludwig S, et al. Combining accelerometer and GPS features to evaluate community mobility in Knee Ankle Foot Orthoses (KAFO) users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:1386–1393.
  • McCormick BP, Brusilovskiy E, Snethen G, et al. Getting out of the house: the relationship of venturing into the community and neurocognition among adults with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2022;45(1):18–25.
  • Pfeiffer B, Brusilovskiy E, Hallock T, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on community participation and mobility in young adults with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52(4):1553–1567.
  • Heatwole Shank KS. Fidelity and utility of GPS loggers as a tool for understanding community participation of older adults. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29(4):282–292.
  • Townley G, Brusilovskiy E, Klein L, et al. Community mental health center visits and community mobility of people with serious mental illnesses: a facilitator or constraint? Community Ment Health J. 2022;58(3):420–428.
  • Brusilovskiy E, Klein LA, Townley G, et al. Examining the relationship between community mobility and participation using GPS and self-report data. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:113539.
  • MeRcier HW, Hamner JW, Torous J, et al. Digital phenotyping to quantify psychosocial well-being trajectories after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(12):1138–1144.
  • Hanke TA, Hwang S, Keller S, et al. Measuring community mobility in survivors of stroke using global positioning system technology: a prospective observational study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(3):175–185.
  • Townley G, Brusilovskiy E, Snethen G, et al. Using geospatial research methods to examine resource accessibility and availability as it relates to community participation of individuals with serious mental illnesses. Am J Community Psychol. 2018;61(1–2):47–61.
  • Townley G, Pearson L, Lehrwyn JM, et al. Utilizing participatory mapping and GIS to examine the activity spaces of homeless youth. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;57(3–4):404–414.
  • Chan DV, Gopal S, Helfrich CA. Accessibility patterns and community integration among previously homeless adults: a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) approach. Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:142–152.
  • Chan DV, Helfrich CA, Hursh NC, et al. Measuring community integration using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and participatory mapping for people who were once homeless. Health Place. 2014;27:92–101.
  • Jayaraman A, Deeny S, Eisenberg Y, et al. Global position sensing and step activity as outcome measures of community mobility and social interaction for an individual with a transfemoral amputation due to dysvascular disease. Phys Ther. 2014;94(3):401–410.
  • Evans CC, Hanke TA, Zielke D, et al. Monitoring community mobility with global positioning system technology after a stroke: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012;36(2):68–78.
  • Townley G, Kloos B, Wright PA. Understanding the experience of place: expanding methods to conceptualize and measure community integration of persons with serious mental illness. Health Place. 2009;15(2):520–531.
  • Heatwole Shank KS, Presgraves E. Geospatial mapping of late-life couplehood: dimensions of joint participation. OTJR. 2019;39(3):176–183.
  • Gough C, Lewis LK, Barr C, et al. Community participation of community dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):612.
  • Liddle J, Ireland D, Krysinska K, et al. Lifespace metrics of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia recorded via geolocation data. Australas J Ageing. 2021;40(4):e341–e346.
  • Liddle J, Sundraraj A, Ireland D, et al. Impact of deep brain stimulation on people with Parkinson’s disease: a mixed methods feasibility study exploring lifespace and community outcomes. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2019;32(2):97–107.
  • Callaway L, Tregloan K, Williams G, et al. Evaluating access and mobility within a new model of supported housing for people with neurotrauma: a pilot study. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(1):64–76.
  • Hordacre B, Barr C, Crotty M. Use of an activity monitor and GPS device to assess community activity and participation in transtibial amputees. Sensors. 2014;14(4):5845–5859.
  • Zhu L, Duval C, Boissy P, et al. Comparing GPS-based community mobility measures with self-report assessments in older adults with Parkinson’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(12):2361–2370.
  • Boissy P, Blamoutier M, Brière S, et al. Quantification of free-living community mobility in healthy older adults using wearable sensors. Front Public Health. 2018;6:216.
  • Borisoff JF, Ripat J, Chan F. Seasonal patterns of community participation and mobility of wheelchair users over an entire year. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(8):1553–1560.
  • Ripat J, Borisoff JF, Grant LE, et al. Patterns of community participation across the seasons: a year-long case study of three Canadian wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(6):722–731.
  • Zhu L, Boissy P, Duval C, et al. How long should GPS recording lengths Be to capture the community mobility of An older clinical population? A Parkinson’s example. Sensors. 2022;22(2):563.
  • Chan DV, Thorpe DE, Trost SG, et al. Novel approaches to measuring community integration in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(18):2653–2664.
  • Little LM, Rojas JP, Bard A, et al. Automated measures to understand communication opportunities for young children with autism in the community: a pilot study. OTJR. 2019;39(2):124–130.
  • Irvin DW, Bard A, Wallisch A, et al. Measuring social communication in the community: novel tools for advancing family participation. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(6):7206205060p1–7206205060p7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.