The influence of communal spaces on patient activity in rehabilitation: a mixed methods study

References

• Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(5):571–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, et al. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbert J, Crotty M, Whitehead C, Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Trial Collaborative Group, et al. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation after hip fracture is associated with improved outcome: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(7):507–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Health Services Research Institute. The Australasian rehabilitation outcomes Centre (AROC) annual report: the state of rehabilitation in Australia in 2020. Australia: The University of Woolloongong; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Graham JE, Granger CV, Karmarkar AM, et al. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of follow-up information on patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation programs in 2002–2010. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(3):231–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2529–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talkowski JB, Lenze EJ, Munin MC, et al. Patient participation and physical activity during rehabilitation and future functional outcomes in patients after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016;62(4):182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrivener K, Pocovi N, Jones T, et al. Observations of activity levels in a purpose-built, inpatient, rehabilitation facility. Herd. 2019;12(4):26–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peiris CL, Taylor NF, Shields N. Patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for lower limb orthopaedic conditions do much less physical activity than recommended in guidelines for healthy older adults: an observational study. J Physiother. 2013;59(1):39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:813765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zusman EZ, Dawes MG, Edwards N, et al. A systematic review of evidence for older adults’ sedentary behavior and physical activity after hip fracture. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(5):679–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosbergen IC, Grimley RS, Hayward KS, et al. Embedding an enriched environment in an acute stroke unit increases activity in people with stroke: a controlled before-after pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1516–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevdzija M, Marquardt G. Stroke patients’ nonscheduled activity during inpatient rehabilitation and its relationship with the architectural layout: a multicenter shadowing study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021;11:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anåker A, von Koch L, Sjöstrand C, et al. A comparative study of patients’ activities and interactions in a stroke unit before and after reconstruction-the significance of the built environment. PLOS One. 2017;12(7):e0177477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon MM, Elf M, Churilov L, et al. Can the physical environment itself influence neurological patient activity? Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(10):1177–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anåker A, von Koch L, Heylighen A, et al. “It’s lonely”: patients’ experiences of the physical environment at a newly built stroke unit. Herd. 2019;12(3):141–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698–1708.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosbergen ICM, Brauer SG, Fitzhenry S, et al. Qualitative investigation of the perceptions and experiences of nursing and allied health professionals involved in the implementation of an enriched environment in an Australian acute stroke unit. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetterman TC, Fetters MD, Creswell JW. Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):554–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit – rehabilitation services report 2020. Melbourne, Australia; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Standards for the provision of inpatient adult rehabilitation medicine services in public and private hospitals. Sydney, Australia: The Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2019. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Börjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, et al. The “Saltin-Grimby physical activity level scale” and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl 4):119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical, cognitive and social activity levels of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation within a mixed rehabilitation unit. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(1):91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosbergen ICM, Tonello I, Clark RA, et al. Does hospital design impact on patient activity levels and time spent alone? Disabil Rehabil. 2020;18:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the hawthorne effect. BMJ. 2015;351:h4672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Verderber S. On the planning and design of hospital circulation zones. Herd. 2017;10(2):124–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311(7000):299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Gombert-Waldron K, Honey S, et al. Health services and delivery research. Using co-production to increase activity in acute stroke units: the CREATE mixed-methods study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton A. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. EFI. 2004;22(2):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd PS, Parshall MB. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2000;10(3):293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for macintosh, version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exer Health. 2019;11(4):589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson-Smith R, Pflaumer L, Elf M, et al. Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenah K, Bernhardt J, Cumming T, et al. Boredom in patients with acquired brain injuries during inpatient rehabilitation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(22):2713–2722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aries A, Hunter S. Optimising rehabilitation potential after stroke: a 24‐hour interdisciplinary approach. British J Neurosci Nurs. 2014;10(6):268–273.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson-Smith R, Churilov L, Newton C, et al. A framework for designing inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities: a new approach using interdisciplinary value-focused thinking. Herd. 2019;12(4):142–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Herd. 2008;1(3):61–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo Q, Cann B, McClement S, et al. Keep in touch (KIT): feasibility of using internet-based communication and information technology in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezeugwu VE, Garga N, Manns PJ. Reducing sedentary behaviour after stroke: perspectives of ambulatory individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(25):2551–2558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DB, Jose K, English C, et al. Factors influencing sedentary time and physical activity early after stroke: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehab. 2022;44(14):3501–3509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Amatya B, Elmalik A, et al. An enriched environmental programme during inpatient neuro-rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(5):417–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Alborough K, Janssen H, et al. Exploring staff experience of an “enriched environment” within stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative sub-study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(21):1783–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Lipson-Smith R, Davis A, et al. Why hospital design matters: a narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(4):370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun D, Choi J. Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: a systematic literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;93:74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Halloran R, Grohn B, Worrall L. Environmental factors that influence communication for patients with a communication disability in acute hospital stroke units: a qualitative metasynthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1 Suppl):S77–S85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk M, Vreven J, Deschodt M, et al. Can in-hospital or post discharge caregiver involvement increase functional performance of older patients? A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Bellon M, Lawn S, et al. Family-directed approach to brain injury (FAB) model: a preliminary framework to guide family-directed intervention for individuals with brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(7):854–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar