An umbrella review of the literature on the effectiveness of goal setting interventions in improving health outcomes in chronic conditions

References

• CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Chronic disease prevention and health promotion: chronic disease overview; 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/pdf/nccdphp-overview-508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO global report: preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment; 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients withs chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1909–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Handley MA. Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(2):174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MT, Newton KS. Supporting self-management in patients with chronic illness. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(8):1503–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Committee for Quality Assurance. Patient-centered medical home (PCMH); 2011. Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/programs/health-care-providers-practices/patient-centered-medical-home-pcmh/.
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. Handbook of theories of social psychology. Volume 1. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen SA, Daniëls R, van Bokhoven MA, et al. Setting goals in chronic care: shared decision making as self-management support by the family physician. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21(2):138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJC, et al. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD009727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredrix M, McSharry J, Flannery C, et al. Goal-setting in diabetes self-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining content and effectiveness of goal-setting interventions. Psychol Health. 2018;33(8):955–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Gao G, Peng Y. The effect of goal setting in asthma self-management education: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6(3):334–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296–2304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, et al. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(3):CD010523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smit EB, Bouwstra H, Hertogh CM, et al. Goal-setting in geriatric rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):395–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(3):95–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderas JM, Alonso J. Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(9):1125–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Pieper D, et al. Preferred Reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: national Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan E, O'Cathain A, Rousseau N, et al. Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e033516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Walker MF, Langhorne P, et al. What’s in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e009051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Higgins JPT, Hedges LV, et al. Basics of meta-analysis: i (2) is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(1):5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belbasis L, Bellou V, Evangelou E, et al. Environmental risk factors and multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(3):263–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, et al. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;23:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, et al. Systematic evaluation of the associations between environmental risk factors and dementia: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(4):406–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Altman DG. data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; 2019. DOI: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, et al. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(9):739–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabaei-Aghdaei Z, McColl-Kennedy JR, Coote LV. Goal setting and health-related outcomes in chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Med Care Res Rev. 2022. DOI:10.1177/10775587221113228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato A, D'Avanzo B, Cinquini M, et al. Effects of goal-oriented care for adults with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(3):371–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (US). Recruitment challenges in clinical trials for different diseases and conditions. Public engagement and clinical trials: new models and disruptive technologies: workshop summary 2012. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92105/.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo NE. Understanding analyses of randomized trials. 3rd edition. In John CB III, Hoaglin DC, editors. Medical uses of statisitics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009. p. 195–237.
   Google Scholar
• Lin L. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes. PLOS One. 2018;13(9):e0204056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dlugonski D, Pilutti LA, Sandroff BM, et al. Steps per day among persons with multiple sclerosis: variation by demographic, clinical, and device characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1534–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, et al. How Physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017;97(7):707–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeyer H, Burtin C, Hornikx M, et al. The minimal important difference in physical activity in patients with COPD. PLOS One. 2016;11(4):e0154587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154587
   Google Scholar
• Teylan M, Kantorowski A, Homsy D, et al. Physical activity in COPD: minimal clinically important difference for medical events. Chronic Resp Dis. 2019;16. DOI:10.1177/1479973118816424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann C, Rosenbaum S, Lawrence A, et al. Updating goal-setting theory in physical activity promotion: a critical conceptual review. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;15(1):34–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, et al. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strecher VJ, Seijts GH, Kok GJ, et al. Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change. Health Educ Q. 1995;22(2):190–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar