A mixed-methods feasibility case series of a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention for people with multiple sclerosis

References

• Cardone A. Having the conversation about work with people with multiple sclerosis: a guide for healthcare professionals. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017;7(6s):41–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MS Society. MS Prevalence Report. 2020. Available from: https://www.mssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/our-work/our-evidence/ms-in-the-uk
   Google Scholar
• Rumrill PD, Koch LC, Wohlford S. Job retention strategies for individuals with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2013;39:127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Kim Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being? 2006;57:229.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Vocational rehabilitation-the way forward. 2nd ed. BSRM Working Party Report; London: BSRM 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The National Service Framework for long term conditions. London; Department of Health (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The NHS outcomes framework 2015/16. 2013. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/385749/NHS_Outcomes_Framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khan F, Ng L, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(1):CD007256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorstyn D, Roberts R, Murphy G, et al. Online resource to promote vocational interests among job seekers with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimmel MB, Cohen JN, Schneider SJ, et al. A neuropsychologically-based intervention with increased follow-up support for employed women with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(10):1292–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dios Pérez B, Radford K, das Nair R. Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis at work: towards the understanding of the needs for a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention. Work. 2022;72(1):303–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweetland J, Riazi A, Cano SJ, et al. Vocational rehabilitation services for people with multiple sclerosis: what patients want from clinicians and employers. Mult Scler. 2007;13(9):1183–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dios Pérez B. Preventing job loss for people with multiple sclerosis [PhD Thesis]. Embargo: University of Nottingham; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization: 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legislation.gov.uk. 2010. Equality Act 2010. [online] Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Br Med J. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Drummond A, Radford K, et al. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: recording, measuring, and describing occupational therapy intervention. Br J Occupational Therapy. 2010;73:422–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Radford K, Sinclair E, et al. Return to work after stroke: recording, measuring, and describing occupational therapy intervention. Br J Occup Therapy. 2014;77:457–465.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan MJL, Edgley K, Dehoux E. A survey of multiple sclerosis: perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Can J Rehabil. 1990;4:99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;4:353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden E, Horton MC, Ford HL, et al. Screening for the risk of job loss in multiple sclerosis (MS): development of an MS-specific work instability scale (MS-WIS). Mult Scler. 2012;18(6):862–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk JD, Ritvo PG, Ross L, et al. Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18: s 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reenen M, Janssen B. EQ-5D-5L user guide basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation (2015): 9.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia P, Maria Luisa F, Francesco A, et al. Work Self-Efficacy Scale and search for Work Self-Efficacy Scale: a validation study in Spanish and Italian cultural contexts. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones. 2010;26:201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Watkin C, Phillips J, Radford K. Brain injury what is a “return to work” following traumatic brain injury? Analysis of work outcomes 12 months post TBI what is a “return to work” following traumatic brain injury? 2019;34:68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. Brit. Med. J. 320,7227(2000):114.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions Michie et al. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RE, Crosson JC, O'Malley AS, et al. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health. 2000;15:215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Knowles E, Turner J. et al. Phase 3 integration of regression and case studies. Explaining variation in emergency admissions: a mixed-methods study of emergency and urgent care systems. NIHR Journals Library, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pension. Access to work: get support if you have a disability or health condition: what access to work is - GOV UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work.
   Google Scholar
• Doogan C, Playford ED. Supporting work for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(6):646–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG, et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(4):435–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens L, Langdon D. How does cognition relate to employment in multiple sclerosis? A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;26:183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unison. Let's be reasonable: disability equality in the workplace; 2019. Available from: https://www.unison.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/11/Lets-Be-Reasonable-disability-equality-in-the-workplace.docx
   Google Scholar
• Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, et al. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T, Watson N, Brunner R, et al. Disabled people in Britain and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc Policy Adm. 2022;56(1):103–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONS. Standard occupational classification (SOC) – Office for national statistics. ONS; 2020. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/classificationsandstandards/standardoccupationalclassificationsoc/soc2020
   Google Scholar