Anomia in left hemisphere stroke, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease – a comparative study

References

• Armstrong E, Fox S, Wilkinson R. Mild aphasia: is this the place for an argument? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):S268–S278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klugman TM, Ross E. Perceptions of the impact of speech, language, swallowing, and hearing difficulties on quality of life of a group of South African persons with multiple sclerosis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2002;54(4):201–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Schalling E, Hartelius L. Self-Reported changes in cognition, communication and swallowing in multiple sclerosis: data from the Swedish multiple sclerosis registry and from a national survey [article. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;73(1):50–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Baylor C, Amtmann D. Communicative participation restrictions in multiple sclerosis: associated variables and correlation with social functioning. J Commun Disord. 2014;52:196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh R, Haley KL. Subjective communication difficulties in very mild aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(1S):437–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilari K, Cruice M, Sorin-Peters R, et al. Quality of life in aphasia: state of the art. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(3):114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor C, Yorkston K, Eadie T, et al. The communicative participation item bank (CPIB): item bank calibration and development of a disorder-generic short form [article. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(4):1190–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Wahsh S, Ballard K, Kumfor F, et al. Prevalence of self-reported language impairment in multiple sclerosis and the association with health-related quality of life: an international survey study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Dec 16;39:101896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Wahsh S, Heard R, Bogaardt H, et al. Variables associated with self-reported language impairment in multiple sclerosis: a regression analysis. Int J MS Care. 2021;23(2):85–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functining, Disability and Health (ICF) 2001. 2021. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health https://icfeducation.org/what-is-icf
   Google Scholar
• WHO. The top 10 causes of death World Health Organization. 2021. https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Wingfield A. Anomia: neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schalling E, Johansson K, Hartelius L. Speech and communication changes reported by people with Parkinson’s disease. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2017;69(3):131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine M, Martin N. Anomia: theoretical and clinical aspects. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Needle JJ, Harrison KL. What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1 Suppl):S86–S95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Perspectives of quality of life by people with aphasia and their family: suggestions for successful living. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(1):14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell GS. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review. 1986;93(3):283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay MP, Norrving B, Sacco RL, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2019. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(8):806–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wafa HA, Wolfe CDA, Emmett E, et al. Burden of stroke in Europe: thirty-year projections of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years. Stroke. 2020;51(8):2418–2427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Heart Foundation. 2021. https://www.bhf.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell C, Gittins M, Tyson S, et al. Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology. 2021;35(7):950–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake ML. The right hemisphere and disorders of cognition and communication: theory and clinical practice. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Incorporated; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis CJ. Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(3):689–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Tredici K, Braak H. Review: sporadic Parkinson’s disease: development and distribution of alpha-synuclein pathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2016;42(1):33–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestrino R, Schapira AHV. Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(1):27–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monastero R, Cicero CE, Baschi R, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: the Parkinson’s disease cognitive study (PACOS). J Neurol. 2018;265(5):1050–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert C, Bauer M. Multifaceted communication problems in everyday conversations involving people with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sciences. 2017 Sep 25;7(10):123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman KSF, Koerts J, Stowe LA, et al. Sentence comprehension and its association with executive functions in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2011:213983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Language and Parkinson’s disease. Ann Rev Appl Linguist. 2008;28:113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg E, Bjornram C, Hartelius L, et al. High-level language difficulties in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;17(1):63–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KM, Ash S, Xie SX, et al. Evaluation of linguistic markers of word-finding difficulty and cognition in Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(7):1691–1699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann LJP, Troche MS. High-Level language production in Parkinson’s disease: a review. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2011:238956–238912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingwell E, Marriott JJ, Jette N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Europe: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2013;13(1):128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lublin FD. New multiple sclerosis phenotypic classification. Eur Neurol. 2014;72(Suppl 1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloni H. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Nurse Practition. 2018;14(3):172–177.
   Google Scholar
• Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffs G, Perera T, Kolbe SC, et al. What speech can tell us: a systematic review of dysarthria characteristics in multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(12):1202–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozakbas S, Turkoglu R, Tamam Y, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: multi-center, controlled trial. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;22:70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, DeLuca J, Enzinger C, et al. Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: looking back and moving forward. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(9-10):832–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobholz JA, Rao SM. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a review of recent developments. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16(3):283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renauld S, Mohamed-Saïd L, Macoir J. Language disorders in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016;10:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dios Pérez B, Cordova Luna E, Cloutman L, et al. Anomia in people with rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: both word retrieval inaccuracy and delay are common symptoms. Aphasiology. 2020;34(2):195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso K, Brunnegård K, Hartelius L, et al. Assessing high-level language in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Clin Linguist Phonet. 2000;14(5):329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethlean JB, Murdoch BE. Naming errors in multiple sclerosis: support for a combined semantic/perceptual deficit. J Neurolinguist. 1994;8(3):207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott WL, Jordan FM, Murdoch BE, et al. Narrative discourse in multiple sclerosis: an investigation of conceptual structure. Aphasiology. 1997;11(10):969–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend KB, Rabin BM, Groninger L, et al. Language functions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;13(1):78–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethlean JB, Murdoch BE. Performance of subjects with multiple sclerosis on tests of high-level language. Aphasiology. 1997;11(1):39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filley CM. White matter dementia. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2012;5(5):267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph MA, Graham KS, Ellis AW, et al. Naming in semantic dementia–what matters? Neuropsychologia. 1998;36(8):775–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch BE, Theodoros DG. Speech and language disorders in multiple sclerosis. London: Whurr; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sepulcre J, Peraita H, Goni J, et al. Lexical access changes in patients with multiple sclerosis: a two-year follow-up study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(2):169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg IM, Bergendal G. Strategies of lexical substitution and retrieval in multiple sclerosis. Aphasiology. 2009;23(9):1184–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N. Communication changes in Parkinson’s disease. Pract Neurol. 2017;17(4):266–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristensson J, Longoni F, Östberg P, et al. Evaluation of treatment effects of semantic feature analysis on mild anomia in multiple sclerosis. Aphasiology. 2022;36(6):706–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro S, Mondini S, Signorini M, et al. Pragmatic language disorder in Parkinson’s disease and the potential effect of cognitive reserve. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor C, Burns M, Eadie T, et al. A qualitative study of interference with communicative participation across communication disorders in adults. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20(4):269–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatt AL, Fields JA, Paolo AM, et al. Action (verb naming) fluency as an executive function measure: convergent and divergent evidence of validity. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(13):1499–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford JP. The nature of human intelligence. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer M, Saldert C. Complex oral semantic verbal fluency in non-brain-damaged adults and individuals with multiple sclerosis and subjective anomia. Aphasiology. 2020;34(12):1471–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson J, Druks J. Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition. J Neuroling. 1998;11(4):331–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore N, Meier EL, Johnson JP, et al. Typicality-based semantic treatment for anomia results in multiple levels of generalisation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(5):802–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladanyi E, Lukacs A. Word retrieval difficulties and cognitive control in specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(4):918–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benetello A, Finocchiaro C, Capasso R, et al. The dissociability of lexical retrieval and morphosyntactic processes for nouns and verbs: a functional and anatomoclinical study. Brain Lang. 2016;159:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambanaros M, Messinis L, Nasios G, et al. Verb–noun dissociations in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: verb effects of semantic complexity and phonological relatedness. Aphasiology. 2017;31(1):49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dios Pérez B. Anomia in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis [Masters of philosophy]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: University of Manchester; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Saldert C. Pragmatic assessment and intervention in adults, chapter 20. In: Cummings L, editor. Research in clinical pragmatics. (Series: Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology. Vol. 11). Wien: Springer; 2017. p. 527–558.
   Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins MR. Terminology and methodology in the assessment of cognitive-linguistic disorders. Brain Impairment. 2006;7(3):212–222.
   Google Scholar
• Crosson B. Assessment of subtle language deficits in neuropsychological batteries: strategies and implications. In: Sburdone RJ, Long CJ, editors. Ecolog valid neuropsycholog testing. Delray, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press Inc.; 1996. p. 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar N, Finlayson M. A mixed-methods study of cognitive performance in persons with multiple sclerosis: association between neuropsychological test performance and interviews about daily cognitive functioning. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;52:102911–102911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galletta EE, Goral M. Response time inconsistencies in object and action naming in anomic aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(1S):477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiropoulou Drosopoulou C. Speed of word retrieval across neurotypical and aphasic participants: an investigation of novel assessment and treatment methods. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, University of Manchester. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• De Geer S, Hartelius L, Kristensson J. Finding the right words in connected speech: an examination of word-finding difficulties in persons with multiple sclerosis. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38(1):145–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark BC, Fukuyama J. Leveraging big data to understand the interaction of task and language during monologic spoken discourse in speakers with and without aphasia. Lang Cognit Neurosci. 2021;36(5):562–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis G, Wright HH. Modelling confrontation naming and discourse performance in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2016;30(4):364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankestijn-Wilmsen J, Damen I, Voorbraak-Timmerman V, et al. The effect of static versus dynamic depictions of actions in verb and sentence production in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31(10):1166–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Wahsh S, Heard R, Bogaardt H. Development and validation of a speech pathology-specific questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (SMS). Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(6):553–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Baylor CR, Klasner ER, et al. Satisfaction with communicative participation as defined by adults with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. J Commun Disord. 2007;40(6):433–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, et al. Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1944–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Stelt CM, Fama ME, McCall JD, et al. Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2021;160:107961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Tench CR, Tanasescu R, et al. Localised grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome-a coordinate-based meta-analysis, meta-analysis of networks, and meta-regression of voxel-based morphometry studies. Brain Sciences. 2020;10(11):798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17(5):427–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. 4th ed. Toronto: The Psychological Corporation/A Harcourt Assessment Company; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerström M, Skoogh J, Rolstad S, et al. Sahlgrenska academy self-reported cognitive impairment questionnaire (SASCI-Q) – a research tool discriminating between subjectively cognitively impaired patients and healthy controls. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(3):420–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks J, Masterson J. Object and action naming battery. Psychology Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hunting-Pompon R, Kendall D, Bacon Moore A. Examining attention and cognitive processing in participants with self-reported mild anomia. Aphasiology. 2011;25(6-7):800–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph MA, Snell C, Fillingham JK, et al. Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20(2):289–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann Y. A case series comparison of semantically focused vs. phonologically focused cued naming treatment in aphasia. Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(1):1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Toro CM, Bislick LP, Comer M, et al. Development of a short form of the Boston naming test for individuals with aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(4):1089–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy P, Sage K, Lambon Ralph MA. Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(11):1311–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves RE, Bezeau SC, Fogarty J, et al. Boston naming test short forms: a comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;26(7):891–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Arizona: Neuropshycology press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Ellbin S, Jonsdottir IH, Eckerstrom C, et al. Self-reported cognitive impairment and daily life functioning 7–12 years after seeking care for stress-related exhaustion. Scand J Psychol. 2021;62(4):484–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellberg M, Kroon M. Konfrontationsbenämning av substantiv och verb hos svensktalande vuxna utan anomi [Confrontation naming of nouns and verbs] Swedish. [Master’s thesis]: University of Gothenburg; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Torinsson M, Åke S. Konfrontationsbenämning av aktiviteter och objekt hos vuxna svensktalande personer utan känd hjärnskada – en standardiseringsstudie [Confrontation naming of actions and objects in non-brain damaged native Swedish-speaking adults – a standardization study] Swedish. [Master’s thesis]: University of Gothenburg; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Lea & Febiger. Philadelphia, PA Digital pictures courtesy of Pro-Ed. 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg IM. The Boston naming test in Swedish: normative data. Brain Lang. 2005;94(1):19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton A, Hamsher K. Multilingual aphasia examination manual. Iowa City: University of Iowa. 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cavandoli O. La linea [DVD]. Italy: Quipos©, Just4Kids©; 2007. DVD.
   Google Scholar
• Front V, Johansson von Braun A. Bedömning av anomi i sammanhängande tal till rörlig bild med ”main concept”-analys [Assessment of anomia through connected speech to a dynamic depiction using main concept analysis] Swedish. [Master’s thesis]: University of Gothenburg; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer S, Lindström M. Bedömning av anomi genom återberättande av rörlig bild - En pilotstudie [Assessing anomia through video narration - a pilot study] Swedish. [Master’s thesis]: University of Gothenburg; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg IM, Ivachova E, Jones Tinghag K, et al. Swedish norms for word fluency tests: FAS, animals and verbs. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49(5):479–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong AP-H. The use of main concept analysis to measure discourse production in cantonese-speaking persons with aphasia: a preliminary report. J Commun Disord. 2009;42(6):442–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Ass. 1994;6(4):284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Fifth Edition. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Thye M, Szaflarski JP, Mirman D. Shared lesion correlates of semantic and letter fluency in post-stroke aphasia. J Neuropsychol. 2021;15(1):143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Middleton E, Mirman D. Words fail: lesion-symptom mapping of errors of omission in post-stroke aphasia. J Neuropsychol. 2019;13(2):183–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotelli M, Borroni B, Manenti R, et al. Action and object naming in Parkinson’s disease without dementia. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14(6):632–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar