The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Community Integration Measure in patients with chronic stroke

References

• Griffen JA, Hanks RA, Meachen S-J. The reliability and validity of the community ıntegration measure in persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2010;55(3):292–297. doi: 10.1037/a0020503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reistetter TA, Spencer JC, Trujillo L, et al. Examining the community ıntegration measure (CIM): a replication study with life satisfaction. NRE. 2005;20(2):139–148. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2005-20210.
   Google Scholar
• Shioda A, Tadaka E, Okochi A. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the community ıntegration measure for community-dwelling people with schizophrenia. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0138-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. The ınternational classification of functioning disability and health: its development process and content validity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, et al. Application of the ınternational classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(5):281–282. doi: 10.1080/09638280110105222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, et al. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):429–434. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.22195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer CF, Roig RL, Worsowicz GM, et al. Geriatric rehabilitation.. The societal aspects of disability in the older adult. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7 Suppl 3):S23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T-W, Ng SS, Ng GY. Translation and initial validation of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of community integration measure for use in patients with chronic stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:623836. doi: 10.1155/2014/623836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gretschel D, Visagie S, Inglis G. Community integration of adults with disabilities post discharge from an in-patient rehabilitation unit in the Western Cape. S Afr J Physiother. 2017;73(1). a361. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v73i1.361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maleka M, Stewart A, Hale L. The experience of living with stroke in low urban and rural socioeconomic areas of South Africa. S Afr J Physiother. 2012;68(3):25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Becker I, Maleka MD, Stewart A, et al. Community reintegration post-stroke in New Zealand: understanding the experiences of stroke survivors in the lower South ısland. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(12):2815–2822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community ıntegration questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(2):103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S, Opzoomer M, Williams JI, et al. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living ındex. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69(8):583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, et al. The craig handicap assessment and reporting technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998;4(1):16–30. doi: 10.1310/V5RU-FRFE-50E6-E2NA.
   Google Scholar
• Akyurek G, Salar S, Bumin G, et al. Turkish adaptation of the community ıntegration questionnaire (CIQ) and its validity and reliability in people with SCI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):e41–e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.123.
   Google Scholar
• Demirdel S, Bayramlar K. Reliability and validity of the Turkish reintegration to normal living index in amputees. OTJR. 2020;40(3):151–158. doi: 10.1177/1539449220905794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkers M, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, et al. A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002;40(7):351–362. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, published in accordance with resolution WHA29. 35 of the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, May 1976: World Health Organization; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization . International classification of functioning, disability, and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY : World Health Organization. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Minnes P, Carlson P, Ann Mccoll M, et al. Community integration: a useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Inj. 2003;17(2):149–159. doi: 10.1080/02699050301828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, et al. Measuring handicap: the london handicap scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. BMJ Qual Saf. 1994;3(1):11–16. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.11.
   Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJ, de Witte LP, Beurskens AJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire adjusted for people with aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay Ş, Küçükdeveci ACA, Yanık B, et al. The interval scaling properties of the london handicap scale: an example from the adaptation of the scale for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(3):248–255. doi: 10.1177/0269215510380829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. London: Yale University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan SK, Ay S, Evcik D, et al. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):185–191. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(20–21):1566–1574. doi: 10.1080/09638280701618588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh ME, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Community re-integration and long-term need in the first five years after stroke: results from a national survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1834–1838. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.981302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui YY, Vytialingam N, Singh SK, Barriers to community integration for older people in Malaysia: a qualitative study from occupational therapist perspectives. Public Health Open J. 2021;6(1):1–8. doi: 10.17140/PHOJ-6-152.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte ML. Disablement, context, and quality of life after brain injury: measuring what matters. Dissertation abstracts ınternational: section B: the sciences and engineering. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: E-U: University Microfilms International; 2000.
   Google Scholar