Barriers and facilitators to community reintegration in adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: an exploratory study

References

• Saradjian A, Thompson AR, Datta D. The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(11):871–883. doi: 10.1080/09638280701427386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow S, Alibali MW. Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64(1):257–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Procedures and health interventions (ACHI 10th) Australia 2017-2018. 2019. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/procedures-data-cubes/contents/data-cubes.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, O’Donovan MA, Doyle A, et al. Environmental barriers, activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by people with major limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(3):278–284. doi: 10.1177/0309364611407108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desteli E, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, et al. Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40(6):735–739. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung E, Alvaro R, Colotla V. Psychological distress in workers with traumatic upper or lower limb amputations following industrial injuries. Rehabil Psychol. 2003; May48(2):109–112. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.48.2.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Sluis CK, Hartman PP, Schoppen T, et al. Job adjustments, job satisfaction and health experience in upper and lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(1):41–51. doi: 10.1080/03093640802555917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz M, Erbahçeci F, Ulger O, et al. Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(4):262–268. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurr L, Gulick K, Yancosek K, et al. Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(2):160–175; quiz 176. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF, the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström H, Hermansson L. Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68–76. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1363828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Pettersson I, Janeslätt G, et al. The influence of environment: experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis—a qualitative study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(1):28–36. doi: 10.1177/0309364617704801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligthelm EJ, Wright SD. Lived experience of persons with an amputation of the upper limb. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2014;18(2):99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2013.08.018.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell J, Friedland J, Kirsh B, et al. The value filter: a novel framework for psychosocial adjustment to traumatic upper extremity amputation. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32(1):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09976-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison A, D’Cruz K, Ross P, et al. Exploring the barriers and facilitators to community reintegration for adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: a mixed methods systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2023; 1–14. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2200038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Silver B. Measuring community integration in persons with limb trauma and amputation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):561–580.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CL, Bennett CL, Rosner DK, et al. Perceptions of ability among adults with upper limb absence: impacts of learning, identity, and community. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3306–3315. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed D. Understanding and meeting the needs of farmers with amputations. Orthop Nurs. 2004;23(6):397–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgado Ramirez DZ, Nakandi B, Ssekitoleko R, et al. The lived experience of people with upper limb absence living in Uganda: a qualitative study. Afr j Disabil. 2022;11(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Upper Extremity Amputation Rehabilitation 2014. Available from: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Rehab/UEAR/VADoDCPGManagementofUEAR121614Corrected508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICare NSW. Guidance on the support pathway for people with a limb amputation (and trialling a prosthesis). Sydney (Australia): New South Wales Government; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 1998;4(1):1–15. doi: 10.1310/BJJA-2018-45KL-0VTL.
   Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Clark A, Pappadis MR. What is community integration anyway?: defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(2):121–127. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181cd1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levers M-JD. Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. SAGE Open. 2013;3(4):215824401351724. doi: 10.1177/2158244013517243.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospitals info & Downloads Glossary: Australian Government; 2023 [updated 06.05.2023; cited 2023 June 23]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/content/glossary.
   Google Scholar
• Keeves J, Hutchison A, D’Cruz K, et al. Social and community participation following traumatic lower limb amputation: an exploratory qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022; 1–9. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2152114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm J, Ponsford J. Predictors of global functioning and employment 10 years following traumatic brain injury compared with orthopaedic injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(13-14):1539–1546. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Research methods and evidence-based practice. Melbourne (Australia): Oxford University Press; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson-Wood T, Balogun-Mwangi O, Weber A, et al. What is it going to be like?": a phenomenological investigation of racial, gendered, and sexual microaggressions among highly educated individuals. Qual Psychol. 2020;7(1):43–58. doi: 10.1037/qup0000113.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London (England): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns and Psychother Res. 2021;21(1):37–47. doi: 10.1002/capr.12360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–352. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol. 2022;9(1):3–26. doi: 10.1037/qup0000196.
   Google Scholar
• Dey I. Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Geneva. World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjansdottir F, Dahlin LB, Rosberg H, et al. Social participation in persons with upper limb amputation receiving an esthetic prosthesis. J Hand Ther. 2020;33(4):520–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messinger S, Bozorghadad S, Pasquina P. Social relationships in rehabilitation and their impact on positive outcomes among amputees with lower limb loss at Walter Reed national military medical center. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):86–93. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichmann JP, Bartman KR. An integrative review of peer support for patients undergoing major limb amputation. J Vasc Nurs. 2018;36(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2017.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radenovic M, Aguilar K, Wyrough AB, et al. Understanding transitions in care for people with major lower limb amputations from inpatient rehabilitation to home: a descriptive qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(16):4211–4219. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1882009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valizadeh S, Dadkhah B, Mohammadi E, et al. The perception of trauma patients from social support in adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a qualitative study. Indian J. 2014;20(3):229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Stutts LA, Stanaland AW. Posttraumatic growth in individuals with amputations. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(1):167–171. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutts LA, Bills SE, Erwin SR, et al. Coping and posttraumatic growth in women with limb amputations. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(6):742–752. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1009379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson GK, Daher M, Hodgkinson A, et al. Comparing the injury profile, service use, outcomes, and comorbidities of people with severe TBI across urban, regional, and remote populations in New South Wales: a multicentre study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(2):E26–E38. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbe BJ, Sleney JS, Gosling CM, et al. Patient perspectives of care in a regionalised trauma system: lessons from the victorian state trauma system. Med J Aust. 2013;198(3):149–152. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford K, Frude N, Cuddihy R. Positive coping and stress-related psychological growth following lower limb amputation. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(3):266–277. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse S, Tsoi EWS, Hamilton B, et al. Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: a critical review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;62(3):281–291. doi: 10.1177/0020764015623970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna S, Jones F, Glenfield P, et al. Bridges self-management program for people with stroke in the community: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(5):697–704. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nott M, Wiseman L, Seymour T, et al. Stroke self-management and the role of self-efficacy. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(10):1410–1419. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1666431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry. 2004;15(1):1–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyball D, Bennett AN, Schofield S, et al. Post-traumatic growth amongst UK armed forces personnel who were deployed to Afghanistan and the role of combat injury, mental health and pain: the ADVANCE cohort study. Psychol Med. 2023;53(11):5322–5331. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne IT. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs. 1997; 26(3):623–630. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. AJTAS. 2016;5(1):1–4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(3):292–300. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90074-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlie K, Skjeldal OH, Garfelt B, et al. Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: prevalence, demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(17-18):1636–1649. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.541973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi L, Inaba K, Barmparas G, et al. Traumatic limb amputations at a level I trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37(1):67–72. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0011-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon M, Idle J, Lay K, et al. Community in the pandemic: experiences and strategies by people with acquired brain injury and their families during COVID-19. 1. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(6):1038–1045. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2049377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne (Australia): Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Aged Care. Modified Monash Model 2021 [cited 2023 June 11]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/topics/rural-health-workforce/classifications/mmm.
   Google Scholar