Perceptions of prosthetic attention among lower limb prosthesis users: a focus group study

References

• Versluys R, Beyl P, Van Damme M, et al. Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(2):65–75. doi: 10.1080/17483100802715092.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geurts ACH, Mulder TW. Attention demands in balance recovery following lower limb amputation. J Mot Behav. 1994;26(2):162–170. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan SJ, Hafner BJ, Kelly VE. Dual-task walking over a compliant foam surface: a comparison of people with transfemoral amputation and controls. Gait Posture. 2017;58:41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.07.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan SJ, Hafner BJ, Kelly VE. The effects of a concurrent task on walking in persons with transfemoral amputation compared to persons without limb loss. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(4):490–496. doi: 10.1177/0309364615596066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackerby R, Lukosch S, Munro D. Understanding and measuring the cognitive load of amputees for rehabilitation and prosthesis development. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022;4(3):100216. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan SJ, Hafner BJ, Kartin D, et al. Dual-task standing and walking in people with lower limb amputation: a structured review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(6):652–666. doi: 10.1177/0309364618785728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frengopoulos C, Payne MWC, Holmes JD, et al. Comparing the effects of dual-task gait testing in new and established ambulators with lower extremity amputations. Pm R. 2018;10(10):1012–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.03.018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirdel S, Erbahçeci F, Yazıcıoğlu G. The effects of cognitive versus motor concurrent task on gait in individuals with transtibial amputation, transfemoral amputation and in a healthy control group. Gait Posture. 2022;91:223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller S, Ramstrand N, Hagberg K, et al. Cortical brain activity in transfemoral or knee-disarticulation prosthesis users performing single- and dual-task walking activities. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020;7:2055668320964109. doi: 10.1177/2055668320964109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schack J, Pripp AH, Mirtaheri P, et al. Increased prefrontal cortical activation during challenging walking conditions in persons with lower limb amputation – an fNIRS observational study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(2):255–265. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1758979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Willingham LL, Buell NC, et al. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RM, Turner AP, Orendurff M, et al. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(7):989–994. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(6):706–713. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90177-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M, et al. The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(9):1238–1244. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Abrahamson DC, et al. Characterizing mobility from the prosthetic limb user’s perspective: use of focus groups to guide development of the prosthetic limb users survey of mobility. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(5):582–590. doi: 10.1177/0309364615579315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowski R. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? research case examples. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(8):652–661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, et al. Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (plus-M). Pm R. 2023;15(4):456–473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallagher P, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, et al. Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(6):487–496. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181dd8cf1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Horgan O, Franchignoni F, et al. Body image in people with lower-limb amputation: a Rasch analysis of the Amputee Body Image Scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(3):205–215. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3180321439.
   Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, et al. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(8):931–938. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90090-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):291–295. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin Holmes AG. Researcher positionality – a consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research – a new researcher guide. education. 2020;8(4):1–10. doi: 10.34293/education.v8i4.3232.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson M. Participatory research methods: people with learning difficulties. Br J Nurs. 1997;6(19):1114–1121. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1997.6.19.1114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse JM. Strategies of intraproject sampling. In: Nursing research: A qualitative perspective. 4th ed. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett; 2007. p. 529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb GS, Huttlinger K. Reflexivity in nursing research. West J Nurs Res. 1989;11(6):765–772. doi: 10.1177/019394598901100612.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(16):963–973. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001696764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens CD, Gutzwiller RS, McCarley JS. Applied attention theory. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni J, Wright S, Toole C, et al. Falls in patients with lower limb amputations: prevalence and contributing factors. Physiotherapy. 1996;82(2):130–136. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66968-4.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031–1037. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bootsma-van der Wiel A, Gussekloo J, De Craen AJM, et al. Walking and talking as predictors of falls in the general population: the Leiden 85-plus study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(10):1466–1471. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51468.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney FC, Harwood RH, Gladman JRF, et al. The relationship between executive function and falls and gait abnormalities in older adults: a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36(1-2):20–35. doi: 10.1159/000350031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies P, Gallagher P, Philbin M. Staying “just normal”: preservation strategies in prosthesis use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):379–385. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1451561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, McDonald CL, Hafner BJ, et al. Fall-related events in people who are lower limb prosthesis users: the lived experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;0:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber G, del Aguila M, et al. Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner S, McGregor AH. Perceived effect of socket fit on major lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation: a clinician and amputee perspective. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020;2(3):100059. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100059.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085–2094. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.671885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan SJ, Askew RL, Hafner BJ. Measurements of best, worst, and average socket comfort are more reliable than current socket comfort in established lower limb prosthesis user. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(6):1201–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui KM, Raugi GJ, Nguyen VQ, et al. Skin problems in individuals with lower-limb loss: literature review and proposed classification system. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(9):1085–1090. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batten H, Lamont R, Kuys S, et al. What are the barriers and enablers that people with a lower limb amputation experience when walking in the community? Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(24):3481–3487. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1597177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts E, Burhani L, Lankester R, et al. A qualitative study examining prosthesis use in everyday life in individuals with lower limb amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021;45(4):296–303. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce DJ, Breakey JW. The impact of C-Leg on the physical and psychological adjustment to transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2007;19(1):7–14. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0b013e31802d41a4.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick M, Spiers J. The use of videoconferencing as a medium for the qualitative interview. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):1–11. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800101.
   Google Scholar