235
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

Towards multi-faceted outcomes of participation-based interventions: mapping the PREP’s effects for children and youth with disabilities

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 23 Jul 2023, Accepted 01 Nov 2023, Published online: 21 Nov 2023

References

  • Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13237.
  • King G, Chiarello LA, Ideishi R, et al. The nature, value, and experience of engagement in pediatric rehabilitation: perspectives of youth, caregivers, and service providers. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020;23(1):18–30. doi:10.1080/17518423.2019.1604580.
  • Palisano RJ, Chiarello LA, King GA, et al. Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):1041–1052. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.628740.
  • Law M, Anaby D, Imms C, et al. Improving the participation of youth with physical disabilities in community activities: an interrupted time series design. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):105–115. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12177.
  • Anaby D, Avery L, Gorter JW, et al. Improving body functions through participation in community activities among young people with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(5):640–646. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14382.
  • Anaby DR, Law M, Feldman D, et al. The effectiveness of the pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) intervention: improving participation of adolescents with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(5):513–519. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13682.
  • Kramer JM, Helfrich C, Levin M, et al. Initial evaluation of the effects of an environmental-focused problem-solving intervention for transition-age young people with developmental disabilities: project TEAM. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(8):801–809. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13715.
  • Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation-related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(11):1101–1116. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13959.
  • Granlund M, Blackstone S, Norris L. Outcome research in augmentative and alternative communication: defining outcomes. Västerås: Mälardalen University Press; 1997.
  • Schlosser R, Braun U. Efficacy of AAC interventions: methodologic issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects. Augment Altern Commun. 1994;10(4):207–223. doi:10.1080/07434619412331276920.
  • Anaby D. Towards a new generation of participation-based interventions for adolescents with disabilities: the impact of the environment and the need for individual-based designs. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(8):735–736. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13749.
  • Krasny-Pacini A. Single-case experimental designs for child neurological rehabilitation and developmental disability research. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(5):611–624. doi:10.1111/dmcn.15513.
  • Anaby D, Lal S, Huszczynski J, et al. Interrupted time series design: a useful approach for studying interventions targeting participation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34(4):457–470. doi:10.3109/01942638.2013.866612.
  • Anaby DR, Law MC, Majnemer A, et al. Opening doors to participation of youth with physical disabilities: an intervention study. Can J Occup Ther. 2016;83(2):83–90. doi:10.1177/0008417415608653.
  • Willis C, Girdler S, Thompson M, et al. Elements contributing to meaningful participation for children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(17):1771–1784. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1207716.
  • Burrough M, Beanlands C, Sugarhood P. Experiences of using pathways and resources for participation and engagement (PREP) intervention for children with acquired brain injury: a knowledge translation study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8736. doi:10.3390/ijerph17238736.
  • Simeonsson R. Intervention in communicative disability: evaluation issues and evidence. In: Ronnberg T, Hjelmquist E, editors. Proceedings of the intervention symposium on communicative disability compensation and development. Linköping, Sweden: linköping University press; 1995. p. 79–95.
  • Granlund M. Participation – as a means and an end in intervention work. Presented at: Capturing the Magic – Participation for all (CAPA) Conference; 2022 Sep 13–15; Beitostölen, Norway.
  • Rosen A, Proctor EK. Distinctions between treatment outcomes and their implications for treatment evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981;49(3):418–425. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.49.3.418.
  • Kang L-J, Huang H-H, Wu Y-T, et al. Initial evaluation of an environment-based intervention for participation of autistic children: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;2023:1–11. doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2209743.
  • Anaby D, Avery L, Palisano RJ, et al. Participation and beyond: the benefits of environmental-based approaches among young people with physical disabilities. Paper presented at: the 35th European academy of childhood disability annual meeting; 2023 May 24–27; Ljubljana, Slovenia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(S2):19.
  • Chiarello LA. Excellence in promoting participation: striving for the 10 Cs—client-centered care, consideration of complexity, collaboration, coaching, capacity building, contextualization, creativity, community, curricular changes, and curiosity. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017;29(Suppl 3):S16–S22. doi:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000382.
  • Law M, Baptise S, Casrswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure, 5th ed. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2014.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge Academic; 1988.
  • Golos A, Zyger C, Lavie-Pitaro Y, et al. Improving participation among youth with disabilities within their unique socio-cultural context during COVID-19 pandemic: initial evaluation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):3913. doi:10.3390/ijerph20053913.
  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, Team RC. Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. 2022; [cited 2023 June 20]. Available from: https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/nlme/.
  • Anaby D, Vrotsou K, Kroksmark U, et al. Changes in participation patterns of youth with physical disabilities following the pathways and resources for engagement and participation intervention: a time-geography approach. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(5):364–372. doi:10.1080/11038128.2018.1554088.
  • Hoehne C, Baranski B, Benmohammed L, et al. Changes in overall participation profile of youth with physical disabilities following the PREP intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3990. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113990.
  • Killeen H, Anaby DR. The impact of parent involvement on improving participation of children born preterm: the story in the baseline. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;28:100942. doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100942.
  • Waisman-Nitzan M, Ivzori Y, Anaby D. Implementing pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) for children with disabilities in inclusive schools: a knowledge translation strategy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(5):526–541. doi:10.1080/01942638.2022.2037809.
  • Bedell G, Coster W, Law M, et al. Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(2):315–323. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.024.
  • Michelsen SI, Flachs EM, Damsgaard MT, et al. European study of frequency of participation of adolescents with and without cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18(3):282–294. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.12.003.
  • Amalfi A, Li JY, Théberge-Lamoureux V, et al. Mental health problems among transition-aged youth with physical disabilities: an initial evaluation. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1069464. doi:10.3389/fresc.2023.1069464.
  • Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Bartlett DJ, et al. Stability and decline in gross motor function among children and youth with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 21 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(4):295–302. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03196.x.
  • Palisano RJ, Di Rezze B, Stewart D, et al. Life course health development of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(5):470–476. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13402.
  • Baldwin P, King G, Evans J, et al. Solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation: an integrated model for practice. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(4):467–483. doi:10.3109/01942638.2013.784718.
  • Sohl SJ, Lee D, Davidson H, et al. Development of an observational tool to assess health coaching fidelity. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(3):642–648. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.040.
  • King G, Chiarello LA, Thompson L, et al. Development of an observational measure of therapy engagement for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(1):86–97. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1375031.
  • McColl MA, Denis CB, Douglas KL, et al. A clinically significant difference on the COPM: a review. Can J Occup Ther. 2023;90(1):92–102. doi:10.1177/00084174221142177.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.