Reasoning about reasoning – using recall to unveil clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation teams

References

• Paxino J, Denniston C, Woodward-Kron R, et al. Communication in interprofessional rehabilitation teams: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(13):3253–3269. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1836271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesewetter J, Fischer F, Fischer MR. Collaborative clinical reasoning - a systematic review of empirical studies. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37(2):123–128. doi:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):Cd006732. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun D, Choi J. Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: a systematic literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;93:74–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvén M, Holmström IK, Carlestav M, et al. A tension between surrendering and being involved: an interview study on person-centeredness in clinical reasoning in the acute stroke setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2023;112:107718. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd A, Bannigan K, Sugavanam T, et al. Experiences of stroke survivors, their families and unpaid carers in goal setting within stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018;16(6):1418–1453. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgs J, Jensen GM, et al. Clinical reasoning: challenges of interpretation and practice in the 21st century. In: Higgs J, Jensen GM, Loftus S, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2019. p. 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Elvén M, Hochwälder J, Dean E, et al. A clinical reasoning model focused on clients’ behaviour change with reference to physiotherapists: its multiphase development and validation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(4):231–243. doi:10.3109/09593985.2014.994250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hege I, Adler M, Donath D, et al. Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning. Diagnosis (Berl). 2023;10(3):218–224. doi:10.1515/dx-2022-0103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durning SJ, Artino ARJ, Schuwirth L, et al. Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):442–448. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182851b5b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, et al. Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: a concept analysis. Phys Ther. 2019;99(4):440–456. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levett-Jones T, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, et al. The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(6):515–520. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews LK, Mulry CM, Richard L. Matthews model of clinical reasoning: a systematic approach to conceptualize evaluation and intervention. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2017;33(4):360–373. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2017.1303658.
   Google Scholar
• Jaracz K, Grabowska-Fudala B, Górna K, et al. Consequences of stroke in the light of objective and subjective indices: a review of recent literature. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014;48(4):280–286. doi:10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartford W, Lear S, Nimmon L. Stroke survivors’ experiences of team support along their recovery continuum. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):723. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4533-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Durning SJ, Sherbino J, et al. Management reasoning: implications for health professions educators and a research agenda. Acad Med. 2019;94(9):1310–1316. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Rikers RM. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1133–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, et al. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1178–1184. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02924.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner CA. Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(6):204–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson Eklund J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, et al. “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):3–11. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langberg EM, Dyhr L, Davidsen AS. Development of the concept of patient-centredness - a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1228–1236. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi Z, Patel H, Wijk H, et al. A systematic review on implementation of person-centered care interventions for older people in out-of-hospital settings. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42(1):213–224. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaschning K, Körner M, Wirtz M. Analyzing the effects of shared decision-making, empathy and team interaction on patient satisfaction and treatment acceptance in medical rehabilitation using a structural equation modeling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):167–175. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron LJ, Somerville LM, Naismith CE, et al. A qualitative investigation into the patient-centered goal-setting practices of allied health clinicians working in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(6):827–840. doi:10.1177/0269215517752488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):65–75. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Tistad M, Koch L, et al. The importance of patient involvement in stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157149. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walder K, Molineux M. Listening to the client voice - A constructivist grounded theory study of the experiences of client-centred practice after stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2020;67(2):100–109. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Rose H, Ashford S, et al. Patient engagement and satisfaction with goal planning impact on outcome from rehabilitation. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2015;22(5):210–216. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.5.210.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle J. Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Res J. 2003;29(6):861–878. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskins Z, McHugh G, Hassell AB. Getting under the skin of the primary care consultation using video stimulated recall: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):101. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, et al. Person-centered care - ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(4):248–251. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CL, Kaplan SL. A framework and resources for shared decision making: opportunities for improved physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther. 2018;98(12):1022–1036. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talevski J, Wong Shee A, Rasmussen B, et al. Teach-back: a systematic review of implementation and impacts. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231350. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutbeam D, McGill B, Premkumar P. Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(5):901–911. doi:10.1093/heapro/dax015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, et al. Health literacy and shared decision-making: exploring the relationship to enable meaningful patient engagement in healthcare. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(2):521–524. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, et al. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):206–213. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, de Groot V, Ter Steeg AM, et al. Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: rationale and practical tool. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(1):3–12. doi:10.1177/0269215519876299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus TS, Papadimitriou C, Bright FA, et al. Person-centered rehabilitation model: framing the concept and practice of person-centered adult physical rehabilitation based on a scoping review and thematic analysis of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(1):106–120. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):554–564. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogdt-Pruis HR, Ras T, van der Dussen L, et al. Improvement of shared decision making in integrated stroke care: a before and after evaluation using a questionnaire survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):936. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4761-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcum JA. An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(5):954–961. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01900.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar