How do users define success with a lower limb prosthesis? A focus group study

References

• Heinemann AW, Connelly L, Ehrlich-Jones L, et al. Outcome instruments for prosthetics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(1):179–198. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedge FM, Braswell-Christy J, Brown CJ, et al. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(2):119–133. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.578706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunaurd I, Spaulding SE, Amtmann D, et al. Use of and confidence in administering outcome measures among clinical prosthetists: results from a national survey and mixed-methods training program. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(4):314–321. doi: 10.1177/0309364614532865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol. 2000;45:130–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, et al. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):613–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O’Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the orthotics and prosthetics users’ survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27(3):191–206. doi: 10.1080/03093640308726682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, et al. Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: the prosthetic limb users survey of mobility (plus-M). Pm R. 2023;15(4):456–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M. Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical error. Phys Ther. 2011;91(4):555–565. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for People With Lower Limb Amputation: a Survey of Prosthetic Practitioners in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2022 Apr 6 [cited 2022 Aug 23]; Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/science/article/pii/S0003999322002921.
   Google Scholar
• Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, et al. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(6):803–811. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04952-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Wichman T, et al. Prosthesis and wheelchair use in veterans with lower-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(5):567–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald CL, Kramer PA, Morgan SJ, et al. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: a randomized within-subject study. Gait Posture. 2018;62:349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder AJ, Mazzone BN, Miltenberger RS, et al. Biomechanical improvements following foot strike biofeedback training for a patient using a passive dynamic ankle-foot orthosis during running. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(4):447–452. doi: 10.1177/0309364619851935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagawa Y, Turcot K, Armand S, et al. Biomechanics and physiological parameters during gait in lower-limb amputees: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2011;33(4):511–526. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. LEAD and COMPASS: Defining outcome measures and a core dataset for the lower limb prosthetics sector [Internet]. 2021 cited 2022 Sep 14] p. 167. Available from: https://www.ispoint.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ispo_lead__compass_project_r.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tan JM, Halford GRJ, Lukin M, et al. Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(1):13–25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, et al. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1314–1323. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.529234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. 1st edition. London ; Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021. 376. p.
   Google Scholar
• Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Br J Psychol. 2000;91 (Pt 1)(1):1–20. doi: 10.1348/000712600161646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim D. Some implications of critical realism for mental health research. Soc Theory Health. 2014; Feb12(1):1–21. doi: 10.1057/sth.2013.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019; Jul95:103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan B, Mulcahy J, Fitzgerald K. PROMIS® general life satisfaction scale: construct validity in musculoskeletal pain patients. Chiropr Man Ther. 2020;28(1):27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, et al. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(8):931–938. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90090-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue. Rev. ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Draft common data elements (CDEs) for lower limb loss research [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/Limb_Loss_Research_Standards_FINAL_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin Holmes AG. Researcher positionality - a consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research - a new researcher guide. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2020;8(4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Miller MJ, Mealer ML, Cook PF, et al. Qualitative analysis of resilience characteristics of people with unilateral transtibial amputation. Disabil Health J. 2020;13(4):100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone W, Mortel TFvd, Taylor B. A path of perpetual resilience: exploring the experience of a diabetes-related amputation through grounded theory. Contemp Nurse. 2011;39(1):20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies P, Gallagher P, Philbin M. Being “just normal”:a grounded theory of prosthesis use. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1754–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hall M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1169–1175. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.833311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill R, Carson S, Dorahy M. Experiences of psychosocial adjustment within 18 months of amputation: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(9):729–740. doi: 10.3109/09638280903295417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):573–581. doi: 10.1080/09638280802240290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostler C, Donovan-Hall M, Dickinson A, et al. Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2022; Nov 110(0):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Waldera KE, Heckathorne CW, Parker M, et al. Assessing the prosthetic needs of farmers and ranchers with amputations. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(3):204–212. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.699994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald CL, Bennett CL, Rosner DK, et al. Perceptions of ability among adults with upper limb absence: impacts of learning, identity, and community. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3306–3315. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(1):85–100. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins KL, Linassi AG, Zucker-Levin A. A focus group– and patient-driven study to understand patients’ and health care providers’ perspectives on services for people with amputation. Physiother Can. 2021;73(3):244–251. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CL, Cheever SM, Morgan SJ, et al. Prosthetic limb user experiences with crossover feet: a pilot focus group study to explore outcomes that matter. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019;31(2):121–132. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000240.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14-15):837–850. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001708869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorelli C, Yancosek K, Morris R. Amputees unanimous: a 12-step program. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(3):293–300. doi: 10.1177/0309364619836027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; May 3017(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2311-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014; Apr94(4):477–489. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, et al. The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2013; Apr 193(4):470–478. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. “Don’t you talk to your prosthetist?” communicational problems in the prescription of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(6):513–521. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.704125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comstock BCD. Patient–practitioner interaction within the field of prosthetics and orthotics: a scoping review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; Dec47(6):640–646. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford K, Frude N, Cuddihy R. Positive coping and stress-related psychological growth following lower limb amputation. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2005;50(3):266–277. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CL, Kahn A, Hafner BJ, et al. Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(5):1016–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47:258–263.
   Google Scholar
• Limbs 4 life. The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Guide and Planning Workbook for Amputees and Children with Limb Difference [Internet]. Limbs 4 life incoporated; 2020 [cited 2024 May 3]. Available from: https://www.limbs4life.org.au/uploads/banner/Amputee-Guide-to-the-National-Disability-Insurance-Scheme-2020-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine E. A framework for educating health professionals to address the social determinants of health. [Internet]. Washington, DC: the National Academies Press; 2016 cited 2022 Dec 18]. Available from: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21923/a-framework-for-educating-health-professionals-to-address-the-social-determinants-of-health
   Google Scholar
• McDonald C, Bretl S. The impact of the social determinants of health in orthotics and prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023;35(3S):16–23.
   Google Scholar