0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for people with persistent pain; a reflexive thematic analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Received 15 Nov 2023, Accepted 09 Jun 2024, Published online: 19 Jul 2024

References

  • Blyth FM, Briggs AM, Schneider CH, et al. The global burden of musculoskeletal pain—where to from here? Am J Public Health. 2019;109(1):35–40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304747.[PMC]
  • Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):770. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-770.
  • Jackson T, Thomas S, Stabile V, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;385 Suppl 2: s 10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60805-4.
  • Rice ASC, Smith BH, Blyth FM. Pain and the global burden of disease. Pain. 2016;157(4):791–796. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000454.
  • Breivik H, Eisenberg E, O’Brien T. The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229.
  • Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The Revised IASP definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. 2021;161(9):1976–82. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
  • Alexanders J, Anderson A, Henderson S. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ use of psychological interventions: a systematic review of therapists’ perceptions and practice. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.008.
  • Singla M, Jones M, Edwards I, et al. Physiotherapists’ assessment of patients’ psychosocial status: are we standing on thin ice? A qualitative descriptive study. Man Ther. 2015;20(2):328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.004.
  • Verwoerd MJ, Wittink H, Goossens MEJB, et al. Physiotherapists’ knowledge, attitude and practice behaviour to prevent chronification in patients with non-specific, non-traumatic, acute- and subacute neck pain: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;57(vember 2021):102493. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102493.
  • Cowell I, O’Sullivan P, O’Sullivan K, et al. Perceptions of physiotherapists towards the management of non-specific chronic low back pain from a biopsychosocial perspective: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;38(May):113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.10.006.
  • Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S, et al. Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015;61(2):68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.016.
  • Van Dijk J, Elbers S, Mollema J, et al. Physiotherapists using the biopsychosocial model: barriers and facilitators. A scoping review. Pain Practice. 2022;22:61–62.
  • Simpson P, Holopainen R, Schütze R, et al. Becoming confidently competent: a qualitative investigation of training in cognitive functional therapy for persistent low back pain. Physiother Theor Pract. 2022;40(4):804–816. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2151333.
  • Simpson P, Holopainen R, Schütze R, et al. Training of physical therapists to deliver individualized biopsychosocial interventions to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a scoping review. Phys Ther. 2021;101(10):1–12. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab188.
  • Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–187. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00032-0.
  • Hutting N, Johnston V, Staal JB, et al. Promoting the use of self-management strategies for people with persistent musculoskeletal disorders: the role of physical therapists. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(4):212–215. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0605.
  • Hutting N, Caneiro JP, Ong’wen OM, et al. Patient-centered care in musculoskeletal practice: key elements to support clinicians to focus on the person. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;57(July 2021):102434. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102434.
  • Hutting N, Caneiro JP, Ong’wen OM, et al. Person-centered care for musculoskeletal pain: putting principles into practice. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;62(September):102663. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102663.
  • Clarke CL, Ryan CG, Martin DJ. Pain neurophysiology education for the management of individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Man Ther. 2011;16(6):544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.003.
  • Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, et al. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theor Pract. 2016;32(5):332–355. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194646.
  • Siddall B, Ram A, Jones MD, et al. The short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PAIN. 2021;163(1):e20–e30. Articles i. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.
  • Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: the past, present, and future. J Pain. 2015;16(9):807–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005.
  • Wood L, Hendrick PA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain neuroscience education for chronic low back pain: short-and long-term outcomes of pain and disability. Eur. J. Pain. 2019;23(2):234–249. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1314.
  • Darlow B. Beliefs about back pain: the confluence of client, clinician and community. Int. J. Osteopat. Med. 2016;20:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2016.01.005.
  • Kragting M, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Coppieters MW, et al. Illness perceptions in people with chronic and disabling non-specific neck pain seeking primary healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07302-7.
  • Briggs AM, Jordan JE, Buchbinder R, et al. Health literacy and beliefs among a community cohort with and without chronic low back pain. Pain. 2010;150(2):275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.031.
  • Bunzli S, Smith A, Schütze R, et al. Beliefs underlying pain-related fear and how they evolve: a qualitative investigation in people with chronic back pain and high pain-related fear. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008847.
  • Moseley G. Lorimer and DSB. Explain Pain Supercharged, The Clinician’s Manual. South Australia: Noigroup Publications; 2017.
  • Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, et al. Pain neuroscience education for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2019;20(10):1140.e1-1140–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011.
  • Nadelson LS, Heddy BC, Jones S, et al. Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. IJEP. 2018;7(2):151–195. doi: 10.17583/ijep.2018.3349.
  • Leake HB, Heathcote LC, Simons LE, et al. Talking to teens about pain: a modified delphi study of adolescent pain science education. Canadian J. Pain. 2019;3(1):200–208. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2019.1682934.
  • Stanton TR, Karran EL, Butler DS, et al. A pain science education and walking program to increase physical activity in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a feasibility study. Pain Rep. 2020;5(5):e830. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000830.
  • Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, et al. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999;282(12):1157–1162.
  • O’Brien EM, Staud RM, Hassinger AD, et al. Patient-centered perspective on treatment outcomes in chronic pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(1):6–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00685.x.
  • van Rysewyk S, Blomkvist R, Crighton R, et al. Understanding the lived experience of chronic pain: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence syntheses. 2023.
  • Lorimer Moseley G, Leake HB, Beetsma AJ, et al. Teaching patients about pain: the emergence of pain science education, its learning frameworks and delivery strategies. J Pain. 2024;25(5):104425. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.008.
  • Martinez-Calderon J, Ho EKY, Ferreira PH, et al. A call for improving research on pain neuroscience education and chronic pain: an overview of systematic reviews. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(6):353–368–368. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11833.
  • O’Hagan ET, Cashin AG, Traeger AC, et al. Person-centred education and advice for people with low back pain: Making the best of what we know. Braz J Phys Ther. 2011;1(2178–5317):1–13.
  • Miciak M, Mayan M, Brown C, et al. The necessary conditions of engagement for the therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy: an interpretive description study. Arch Physiother. 2018;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40945-018-0044-1.
  • Nicholls DA, Ahlsen B, Bjorbækmo W, et al. Critical physiotherapy: a ten-year retrospective. Physiother Theor Pract. 2023;00(00):1–13.
  • Helme D. Trust me, I’m a patient: pain education for professionals from a lay perspective. Br J Pain. 2012;6(2):79–80.
  • Tellier PP, Bélanger E, Rodríguez C, et al. Improving undergraduate medical education about pain assessment and management: a qualitative descriptive study of stakeholders’ perceptions. Pain Res Manag. 2013;18(5):259–265. doi: 10.1155/2013/920961.
  • Belton J, Hoens A, Scott A, et al. Patients as partners in research: it’s the right thing to do. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(9):623–626. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0106.
  • Duffett L. Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017;150:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029.
  • Belton J, Birkinshaw H, Pincus T. Patient-centered ­consultations for persons with musculoskeletal conditions. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022;30(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00466-w.
  • Hasenbring MI, Pincus T. Effective reassurance in primary care of low back pain: what messages from clinicians are most beneficial at early stages? Clin. J. Pain. 2015;31(2):133–136. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000097.
  • Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan J, et al. Rethinking pain education from the perspectives of people experiencing pain: a meta-ethnography to inform physiotherapy training. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e046363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046363.
  • Lennox Thompson B, Gage J, Kirk R. Living well with ­chronic pain: a classical grounded theory. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;42(8):1141–1152. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1517195.
  • Toye F, Seers K, Hannink E, et al. A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7.
  • Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, et al. What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(1):4–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x.
  • Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan J, et al. Twenty-five years of pain education research-what have we learned? Findings from a comprehensive scoping review of research into pre-registration pain education for health professionals. Pain. 2018;159(11):2146–2158. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001352.
  • Toye F, Belton J, Hannink E, et al. A healing journey with chronic pain: a meta-ethnography synthesizing 195 qualitative studies. Pain Med. 2021;22(6):1333–1344. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa373.
  • Wijma AJ, Speksnijder CM, Crom-Ottens AF, et al. What is important in transdisciplinary pain neuroscience education? A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(18):2181–2191. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1327990.
  • Robinson V, King R, Ryan CG, et al. A qualitative exploration of people’s experiences of pain neurophysiological education for chronic pain: the importance of relevance for the individual. Man Ther. 2016;22:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.10.001.
  • King R, Robinson V, Elliott-Button HL, et al. Pain reconceptualisation after pain neurophysiology education in adults with chronic low back pain: a qualitative study. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:3745651–3745610. doi: 10.1155/2018/3745651.
  • Pate JW, Tran E, Radhakrishnan S, et al. The importance of perceived relevance: a qualitative evaluation of patient’s perceptions of value and impact following a low-intensity group-based pain management program. Medicina (Lithuania). 2021;57(1):46. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010046.
  • Leake HB, Moseley GL, Stanton TR, et al. What do patients value learning about pain? A mixed-methods survey on the relevance of target concepts after pain science education. Pain. 2021;162(10):2558–2568. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002244.
  • Slater H, Jordan JE, O’Sullivan PB, et al. ‘Listen to me, learn from me’: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care. Pain. 2022;163(11):e1145–e1163. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647.
  • Hutter I, Hennink M, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. London SAGE Publications; 2011.
  • Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care, 4th ed. London Wiley Blackwell; 2020.
  • Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, et al. Qualitative research: why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ. 2008;337(aug07 3):a949–a949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a949.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exer. Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  • Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research Design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007, 57–62.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Qualitative research in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Kelly A, Tymms K, Fallon K, et al. Qualitative research in rheumatology: an overview of methods and contributions to practice and policy. J. Rheumatol. 2021;48(1):6–15.
  • O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
  • Finnerup NB, Scholz J, First MB, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic pain for the international classification of diseases (ICD-11) rolf-detlef. Pain. 2018;160(1):19–27.
  • McMahon SA, Winch PJ. Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000837. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000837.
  • ATLAS.ti GmbH. atlas.ti.7. Berlin: Cincom Systems, Inc; 1993.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–352. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual. Res. Sport Exer. Health. 2021;13(2):201–216. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.
  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
  • Linton SJ. Intricacies of good communication in the context of pain: does validation reinforce disclosure? Pain. 2015;156(2):199–200. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460297.25831.67.
  • Edmond SN, Keefe FJ. Validating pain communication: current state of the science. Pain. 2016;156(2):215–219. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460301.18207.c2.
  • Linton SJ, Boersma K, Vangronsveld K, et al. Painfully reassuring? The effects of validation on emotions and adherence in a pain test. Eur. J. Pain. 2012;16(4):592–599. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.07.011.
  • Mol TI, van Bennekom CAM, Scholten EWM, et al. Self-regulation as rehabilitation outcome: what is important according to former patients? Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(24):7484–7490. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1998663.
  • Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002.
  • Howarth M, Warne T, Haigh C. Pain from the inside: understanding the theoretical underpinning of person-centered care delivered by pain teams. Pain Manage Nurs. 2014;15(1):340–348. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.12.008.
  • Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(2):79–86. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099878.
  • Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: therapeutic approaches for non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, and enthesitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(6):717–734. doi: 10.1002/acr.23870.
  • Wijma AJ, Bletterman AN, Clark JR, et al. Patient-centeredness in physiotherapy: what does it entail? A systematic review of qualitative studies. Physiother Theor Pract. 2017;33(11):825–840. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1357151.
  • Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 2000;51(7):1087–1110. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8.
  • MacLeod R, McPherson KM. Care and compassion: part of person-centred rehabilitation, inappropriate response or a forgotten art? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(20-21):1589–1595. doi: 10.1080/09638280701618729.
  • Bunzli S, Watkins R, Smith A, et al. Lives on hold: a qualitative synthesis exploring the experience of chronic low-back pain. Clin. J. Pain. 2013;29(10):907–916. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827a6dd8.
  • Hoggan C. Transformative learning theory: where we are after 45 years. 2023, 5–11.
  • Mezirow J. Transformative learning: theory to practice. In Transformative learning theory, Vol. 7. Wiley Online Library; 1997,5–12.
  • Holopainen R, Piirainen A, Heinonen A, et al. From “non-encounters” to autonomic agency. Conceptions of patients with low back pain about their encounters in the health care system. Musculoskelet Care. 2018;16(2):269–277. doi: 10.1002/msc.1230.
  • Paap D, Krops LA, Preuper HRS, et al. Participants’ unspoken thoughts and feelings negatively influence the therapeutic alliance, a qualitative study in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation setting. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021;0(0):1–11.
  • Acker R, Swain N, Perry M, et al. ‘Thinking about pain in a different way’: patient perspectives of a neuroscience-informed physiotherapy programme for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023;63(December 2022):102691. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102691.
  • Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 2011;6:42.doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
  • Louw A, Sluka KA, Nijs J, et al. Revisiting the provision of pain neuroscience education: an adjunct intervention for patients, but a primary focus for clinician education. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;51(2):57–59. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.9804.
  • Zimney K, Van Bogaert W, Louw A. The biology of chronic pain and its implications for pain neuroscience education: state of the art. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4199. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134199.
  • Correia JC, Waqas A, Aujoulat I, et al. Evolution of therapeutic patient education: a systematic scoping review and scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106128.
  • van der Scheer-Horst E, Rutten G, Stortenbeker I, et al. Limited health literacy in primary care physiotherapy: does a physiotherapist use techniques to improve communication? Patient Educ Couns. 2023;109(May 2022):107624. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107624.
  • Reneman MF, Medicine R, Schrier E, et al. Patients first: toward a patient-centered instrument to measure impact of chronic pain. Phys Ther. 2018;98(7):616–625.
  • Borghuis EMC, Reneman MF, Schiphorst Preuper HR. Assessing discrepancies in outcomes of pain rehabilitation: “these questionnaires don’t measure results that are relevant to me. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(16):2374–2380. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1561956.
  • Vet Hcw d, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Quality of Life Research. Cambridge University Press; 2011. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511996214.