55
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feasibility of telerehabilitation to address the orientation and mobility needs of individuals with visual impairment: perspectives of current guide dog users

, , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Received 08 Mar 2024, Accepted 11 Jun 2024, Published online: 22 Jun 2024

References

  • Gori M, Bertonati G, Mazzoni E, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the everyday life of blind and sighted individuals. Front Psychol. 2022;13:897098, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897098.
  • Khan HM, Abbas K, Khan HN. Investigating the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with visual impairment. Br J Vis Impair. 2023:026461962311589. doi:10.1177/02646196231158919.
  • Rosenblum PL, Chanes-Mora P, McBride RC, et al. Flatten inaccessibility. In Impact of COVID-19 on adults who are blind or have low vision in the United States. America Foundation for the Blind. 2020. https://www.afb.org/research-and-initiatives/flatten-inaccessibility-survey
  • Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539.
  • World Health Organization. World report on vision. Author. 2019.
  • Allen PM, Smith L. SARS-CoV-2 self-isolation: recommendations for people with a vision impairment. Eye. 2020;34(7):1183–1184. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-0917-x.
  • Desrosiers J, Wanet-Defalque M-C, Témisjian K, et al. Participation in daily activities and social roles of older adults with visual impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(15):1227–1234. doi:10.1080/09638280802532456.
  • Wiener WR, Welsh RL, Blasch BB. Foundations of orientation and mobility. 3rd ed. AFB Press; 1997.
  • Kreidy C, Martiniello N, Nemargut JP, et al. How face masks affect the use of echolocation by individuals with visual impairments during COVID-19: international cross-sectional online survey. Interact J Med Res. 2022;11(2):e39366. doi:10.2196/39366.
  • Ashmead DH, Hill EW, Talor CR. Obstacle perception by congenitally blind children. Percept Psychophys. 1989;46(5):425–433. doi:10.3758/bf03210857.
  • Woodward L. How COVID-19 is leading to a guide dog shortage in Canada. Saskatoon: CTV News; 2021.
  • Bergeron-Oliver A, Jones AM. “On hold”: how the pandemic has affected getting guide dogs to those who need them. Canada: CTV News; 2021.
  • Whitmarsh L. The benefits of guide dog ownership. Vis Impair Res. 2005; 7(1):27–42.
  • Yamamoto M, Yamamoto MM, Hart LA. Physical activity and welfare of guide dogs and walking activity of their partners. Anthrozoos. 2015;28(2):277–289.
  • Winters JM. Telerehabilitation research: emerging opportunities. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4(1):287–320. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112801.121923.
  • Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, et al. Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(2):e7. doi:10.2196/rehab.7511.
  • Dewald HP, Smyth CA. Feasibility of orientation and mobility services for young children with vision impairment using teleintervention. Vis Rehabil Intl. 2013;6(1):83–92. doi:10.21307/ijom-2013-009.
  • Bittner AK, Wykstra SL, Yoshinaga PD, et al. Telerehabilitation for people with Low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2(2):1–19. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011019.pub3
  • Bittner AK, Yoshinaga PD, Shepherd JD, et al. Acceptability of telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired using various approaches to facilitate accessibility. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11(8):4.
  • Bittner AK, Kaminski JE, Yoshinaga PD, et al. Outcomes of telerehabilitation versus in-office training with magnification devices for low vision: a randomized controlled trial. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024;13(1):6. doi:10.1167/tvst.13.1.6.
  • Lorenzini MC, Wittich W. Head-mounted visual assistive technology-related quality of life changes after telerehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci. 2021; 98(6):582–591. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001705.
  • Lorenzini MC, Wittich W. Personalized telerehabilitation for a head-mounted low vision aid: a randomized feasibility study. Optom Vis Sci. 2021; 98(6):570–581. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001704.
  • Crossland MD, Silva RS, Macedo AF. Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014; 34(5):552–557.
  • Brody BL, Field LC, Roch-Levecq AC, et al. Computer use among patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(4):190–195.
  • Bittner AK, Yoshinaga P, Bowers A, et al. Feasibility of telerehabilitation for low vision: satisfaction ratings by providers and patients. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):865–872. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001260.
  • Blake K. Orientation and mobility. What is that again? Br J Vis Impair. 2021;39(2):94–103. doi:10.1177/0264619620915260.
  • Deverell L, Bentley SA, Ayton LN, et al. Effective mobility framework: a tool for designing comprehensive O&M outcomes research. Int J Orient Mobil. 2017;7(1):74–86. doi:10.21307/ijom-2017-059.
  • Brennan DM, Tindall L, Theodoros D, et al. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines–October 2010. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(8):662–665.
  • Garaj V, Jirawimut R, Ptasinski P, et al. A system for remote sighted guidance of visually impaired pedestrians. Br J Vis Impair. 2003;21:55–63.
  • Baranski P, Polanczyk M, Strumillo P. A remote guidance system for the blind. In The 12th IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services [Internet]; 2010. IEEE. doi:10.1109/HEALTH.2010.5556539.
  • Baranski P, Strumillo P. Field trials of a teleassistance system for the visually impaired. In 8th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI) [Internet]; 2015. Warsaw, Poland. p. 173–179. doi:10.1109/HSI.2015.7170662.
  • Holmes N, Prentice K. iPhone video link FaceTime as an orientation tool: remote O&M for people with vision impairment. Int J Orient Mobil. 2015;7(1):60–67. doi:10.21307/ijom-2017-057.
  • Scheggi S, Talarico A, Prattichizzo D. A remote guidance system for blind and visually impaired people via vibrotactile haptic feedback. In Scheggi S, Talarico A, Prattichizzo D, editors. 22nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation; 2014. p. 20–23. doi:10.1109/med.2014.6961320.
  • Pietrangelo S, Souaid O, Mailhot A, et al. Exploring barriers and facilitators to tele-rehabilitation in orientation & mobility. In 21st Scientific Symposium on Visual Disability and Rehabilitation, Montreal, Canada; 2022.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
  • B-N Sanders E, Jan Stappers P. Co-Design Co-creation and the new landscapes of design Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co Design [Internet]. 2008;4(1):5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
  • Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. Ann Math Statist. 1961;32(1):148–170. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705148.
  • Williams JR. The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(8):650–652. doi:10.2471/blt.08.050955.
  • Hsieh HF, Shannon ES. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2018;62(1):107–115.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association; 2012; p. 57–71.
  • Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design- choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Inc; 2007.
  • Koch T, Harrington A, Dne RN, et al. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for rēexivity. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(4):882–890. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00725.x.
  • Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, et al. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241–251.
  • Chivate S, Sharma M, Shaikh A, et al. Benefits and challenges of telerehabilitation use by pediatric physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic in western and southern India: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Telerehabil. 2022;14(1):e6466. doi:10.5195/ijt.2022.6466.
  • Buckingham SA, Anil K, Demain S, et al. Telerehabilitation for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment: a survey of United Kingdom Practitioners. JMIRx Med. 2022;3(1):e30516. doi:10.2196/30516.
  • Franco JB, Maximino LP, Secchi LLB, et al. What are the barriers to telerehabilitation in the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases? Port J Public Health. 2023;42(1):1–10. doi:10.1159/000534762.
  • Balas M, Vasiliu D, Austria G, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wait-times for ophthalmic surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. OPTH. 2023;ume 17:1823–1831. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S409479.
  • Schein RM, Schmeler MR, Brienza D, et al. Development of a service delivery protocol used for remote wheelchair consultation via telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(9):932–938. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0010.
  • Bettger JP, Resnik LJ. Point of view telerehabilitation in the age of COVID-19: an opportunity for learning health system research. Phys Ther. 2020;100(11):1913–1916. https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/100/11/1913/5894240 doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa151.
  • Brennan David M, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self-management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:231–248.
  • Nizeyimana E, Joseph C, Louw QA. Organizational readiness and rehabilitation professionals’ views on integrating telerehabilitation into service delivery and students’ clinical training: a qualitative study. Digit Health. 2023;9:1–12.
  • Jones L, Lee M, Gomes RSM. Remote rehabilitation (telerehabilitation) in the sight loss sector: reflections on challenges and opportunities from service providers in the United Kingdom. Bri J of Vis Impair. 2023;0(0):1–16.
  • Jones L, Lee M, Castle CL, et al. Scoping review of remote rehabilitation (telerehabilitation) services to support people with vision impairment. BMJ Open. 2022;12(8):e059985. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059985.
  • Goldman JG, Merkitch D, Brewington D, et al. Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: identifying opportunities for remote care. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1049554. doi:10.3389/fresc.2023.1049554.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.