Evaluating fall event definitions relative to lower limb prosthesis users’ lived experiences

References

• Kulkarni J, Wright S, Toole C, et al. Falls in patients with lower limb amputations: prevalence and contributing factors. Physiotherapy. 1996;82(2):130–136. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66968-4.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031–1037. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong C, Chihuri S, Li G. Risk of fall-related injury in people with lower limb amputations: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(1):80–85. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CB, Miller MJ, Murray AM, et al. Falls after dysvascular transtibial amputation: a secondary analysis of falling characteristics and reduced physical performance. Pm R. 2021;13(1):19–29. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawers A, McDonald CL, Hafner BJ. A survey for characterizing details of fall events experienced by lower limb prosthesis users. PLOS One. 2022;17(7):e0272082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobaigy M, Hafner BJ, Sawers A. The number of falls recalled in the past year and balance confidence predict the frequency of injurious falls by unilateral lower limb prosthesis users. Pm R. 2023;15(4):426–436. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12936.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chihuri S, Wong CK. Factors associated with the likelihood of fall-related injury among people with lower limb loss. Inj Epidemiol. 2018;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0171-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller TA, Paul R, Forthofer M, et al. Stability and falls evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 2): reduced functional mobility is associated with a history of injurious falls in lower limb prosthesis users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;66(4):101679. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundell B, Maradit Kremers H, Visscher S, et al. Direct medical costs of accidental falls for adults with transfemoral amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(6):564–570. doi: 10.1177/0309364617704804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordacre B, Barr C, Crotty M. Community activity and participation are reduced in transtibial amputee fallers: a wearable technology study. BMJ Innov. 2015;1(1):10–16. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000014.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(3):292–300. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90074-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Major MJ, Hafner B, et al. Frequency and circumstances of falls reported by ambulatory unilateral lower limb prosthesis users: a secondary analysis. Pm R. 2019;11(4):344–353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.08.385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zecevic AA, Salmoni AW, Speechley M, et al. Defining a fall and reasons for falling: comparisons among the views of seniors, health care providers, and the research literature. Gerontologist. 2006;46(3):367–376. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.3.367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé M-C, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(6):706–713. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90177-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ, Hubbard SL. Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mechanism versus C-Leg on prosthesis evaluation questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair descent, and knee preference. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):1–14. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.04.0054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblatt NJ, Bauer A, Grabiner MD. Relating minimum toe clearance to prospective, self-reported, trip-related stumbles in the community. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(4):387–392. doi: 10.1177/0309364616650085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath M, Gray LA, Rek B, et al. Can microprocessor knees reduce the disparity in trips and falls risks between above and below knee prosthesis users? PLOS One. 2022;17(9):e0271315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, McDonald CL, Hafner BJ, et al. Fall-related events in people who are lower limb prosthesis users: the lived experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;44(15):3897–3908. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1891467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb SE, Rstad-Stein JÃ, Hauer EC, , et al. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the prevention of falls network Europe Consensus: PROFANE COMMON OUTCOME DATA SET. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(9):1618–1622. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53455.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg International Work Group on the Prevention of Falls by the Elderly. The prevention of falls in later life. A report of the Kellogg International Work Group on the prevention of falls by the elderly. Danish Med Bull. 1987;34 Suppl 4:1–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crenshaw JR, Bernhardt KA, Achenbach SJ, et al. The circumstances, orientations, and impact locations of falls in community-dwelling older women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;73:240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach HW, Reed AT, Arfken CL, et al. Falls in the elderly: reliability of a classification system. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):197–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01626.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon JH. On the natural history of falls in old age. Br Med J. 1960;2(5214):1685–1690. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5214.1685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manford E, Garg A, Manford M. Drop attacks: a practical guide. Pract Neurol. 2024;24(2):106–113. doi: 10.1136/pn-2023-003791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, et al. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. The. Lancet. 2013;381(9860):47–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WC. Conducting semi-structured interviews. In: Newcomer KE, Harry HP, Wholey JS, editors. Handbook of practical program evaluation. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015. P. 492–505. doi: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen R, Mauder K, Sawers A, et al. Fall-related outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users: a focus group study. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists; 2024., March 6).
   Google Scholar
• Sundler AJ, Lindberg E, Nilsson C, et al. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nurs Open. 2019;6(3):733–739. doi: 10.1002/nop2.275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan I. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. AJTAS. 2016;5(1):1. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
   Google Scholar
• Agan J, Koch LC, Rumrill PD. The use of focus groups in rehabilitation research. Work. 2008;31(2):259–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(1):M28–34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller K, Omaña Moreno HA, Frengopoulos C, et al. Reliability, validity, and agreement of the short-form activities-specific balance confidence scale in people with lower extremity amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(6):609–617. doi: 10.1177/0309364619875623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, et al. Construct validity of the prosthetic limb users survey of mobility (PLUS-M) in adults with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers M, Durand C, Powell D, et al. Development of a scale to assess avoidance behavior due to a fear of falling: the fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire. Phys Ther. 2011;91(8):1253–1265. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, et al. Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: the prosthetic limb users Survey of Mobility (PLUS‐M). Pm R. 2023;15(4):456–473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw JR, Kaufman KR, Grabiner MD. Trip recoveries of people with unilateral, transfemoral or knee disarticulation amputations: initial findings. Gait Posture. 2013;38(3):534–536. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann M, Schmalz T, Blumentritt S. Comparative bio­mechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(4):644–652. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major MJ, Fatone S, Roth EJ. Validity and reliability of the berg balance scale for community-dwelling persons with lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2194–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki BE, McIlroy WE, Perry SD. Influence of lateral destabilization on compensatory stepping responses. J Biomech. 1996;29(3):343–353. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00053-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madill A, Sullivan P. Mirrors, portraits, and member checking: managing difficult moments of knowledge exchange in the social sciences. Qual Psychol. 2018;5(3):321–339. doi: 10.1037/qup0000089.
   Google Scholar
• Motulsky SL, Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qual Psychol. 2021;8(3):389–406. doi: 10.1037/qup0000215.
   Google Scholar