0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bottom-up versus Top-down designed rehabilitation sessions in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

, , , , , , & show all
Received 29 Aug 2023, Accepted 14 Jul 2024, Published online: 30 Jul 2024

References

  • Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; Update 2019. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(7):763–788. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897843.
  • Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(1):18–29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
  • Singam A, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Participation in complex and social everyday activities six years after stroke: predictors for return to pre-stroke level. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144344.
  • Winters C, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, et al. Moving stroke rehabilitation forward: the need to change research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):19–30. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172393.
  • Meriano C, Latella D. Occupational therapy interventions: function and occupations. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated, Taylor & Francis; 2008.
  • Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Hinojosa J. Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: is one better than the other? Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58(5):594–599. doi: 10.5014/ajot.58.5.594.
  • Morone G, Spitoni GF, De Bartolo D, et al. Rehabilitative devices for a top-down approach. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(3):187–195. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1574567.
  • Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa M, et al. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. Philadelphia: (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  • Shinohara K, Yamada T, Kobayashi N, et al. The model of human occupation-based intervention for patients with stroke: a randomised trial. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2012;22(2):60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.hkjot.2012.09.001.
  • Tomori K, Nagayama H, Ohno K, et al. Comparison of occupation-based and impairment-based occupational therapy for subacute stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(8):752–762. doi: 10.1177/0269215514555876.
  • Skubik-Peplaski C, Custer M, Powell E, et al. Comparing occupation-based and repetitive task practice interventions for optimal stroke recovery: a pilot randomized trial. Phys Occup Ther Geriat. 2017;35(3–4):156–168. doi: 10.1080/02703181.2017.1342734.
  • Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(0):135–141. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016776.
  • Teasell R, Mehta S, Pereira S, et al. Time to rethink long-term rehabilitation management of stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(6):457–462. doi: 10.1310/tsr1906-457.
  • Seyedian M, Falah M, Nourouzian M, et al. Validity of the Farsi version of mini-mental state examination. 2008; J Med Counc Islam Repub Iran. 25(4):408–414.
  • Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P. Evaluation of a test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical practice. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;14(3):139–150. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2000-14303.
  • Polatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Missiuna C, et al. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) part III-the protocol in brief. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;20(2–3):107–123. doi: 10.1300/J006v20n02_07.
  • McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MP, et al. Exploring a cognitive-based treatment approach to improve motor-based skill performance in chronic stroke: results of three single case experiments. Brain Inj. 2009;23(13–14):1041–1053. doi: 10.3109/02699050903421107.
  • Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2173–2180. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2.
  • Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH, et al. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):972–982. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.036.
  • Tetzlaff B, Barzel A, Stark A, et al. To what extent does therapy of chronic stroke patients address participation? A content analysis of ambulatory physical and occupational therapy based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):545–551. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503732.
  • Hejazi-Shirmard M, Lajevardi L, Rassafiani M, et al. The effects of anxiety and dual-task on upper limb motor control of chronic stroke survivors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71845-7.
  • Najafabadi MM, Azad A, Mehdizadeh H, et al. Improvement of upper limb motor control and function after competitive and noncompetitive volleyball exercises in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(3):401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.012.
  • Collins KC, Kennedy NC, Clark A, et al. Kinematic components of the reach-to-target movement after stroke for focused rehabilitation interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00472.
  • Wu C-y, Chou S-h, Kuo M-y, et al. Effects of object size on intralimb and interlimb coordination during a bimanual prehension task in patients with left cerebral vascular accidents. Motor Control. 2008;12(4):296–310. doi: 10.1123/mcj.12.4.296.
  • Schwarz A, Bhagubai MM, Nies SH, et al. Characterization of stroke-related upper limb motor impairments across various upper limb activities by use of kinematic core set measures. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2022;19:1–18.
  • Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277–2281. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.390.
  • Tamez E, Myerson J, Morris L, et al. Assessing executive abilities following acute stroke with the trail making test and digit span. Behav Neurol. 2011;24(3):177–185. doi: 10.1155/2011/139703.
  • Hijikata N, Kawakami M, Ishii R, et al. Item difficulty of Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity in persons with chronic stroke with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:1395. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.577855.
  • Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73(7):447–454. doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.7.447.
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31. doi: 10.2340/1650197771331.
  • Mathiowetz V, Federman S, Wiemer D. Box and block test of manual dexterity: norms for 6–19 year olds. Can J Occup Ther. 1985;52(5):241–245. doi: 10.1177/000841748505200505.
  • Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
  • Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1184–1193. doi: 10.3109/09638280903437253.
  • Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, et al. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):104–114;quiz 115. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.005.
  • Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82–87. doi: 10.1177/000841749005700207.
  • Cup EH, Scholte Op Reimer W, Thijssen MC, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402–409. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr635oa.
  • McColl MA, Denis CB, Douglas K-L, et al. A clinically significant difference on the COPM: a review. Can J Occup Ther. 2023;90(1):92–102. doi: 10.1177/00084174221142177.
  • Hernandez A, Bubyr L, Archambault PS, et al. Virtual reality–based rehabilitation as a feasible and engaging tool for the management of chronic poststroke upper-extremity function recovery: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10(3):e37506. doi: 10.2196/37506.
  • Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1693–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022.
  • Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(1):104–109. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.001784.
  • Vanderbeken I, Kerckhofs E. A systematic review of the effect of physical exercise on cognition in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(1):33–48. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161388.
  • Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE. Physical activity and exercise after stroke: review of multiple meaningful benefits. Stroke. 2014;45(12):3742–3747. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004311.
  • Jongbloed L, Stacey S, Brighton C. Stroke rehabilitation: sensorimotor integrative treatment versus functional treatment. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43(6):391–397. doi: 10.5014/ajot.43.6.391.
  • Ahn S-N, Yoo E-y, Jung M-y, et al. Comparison of cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance and conventional occupational therapy on occupational performance in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):285–292. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161416.
  • Embrechts E, McGuckian TB, Dijkerman CH, et al. Cognitive-and-motor therapy after stroke is not superior to motor and cognitive therapy alone to improve cognitive and motor outcomes: new insights from a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;105(5):1020–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.010.
  • Cotman CW, Berchtold NC, Christie L-A. Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(9):464–472. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.011.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.