Assessment in Higher Education: The Potential for a Community of Practice to Improve Inter-marker Reliability

References

• Ardichvili, A., Page, V. and Wentling, T. (2003) Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice, Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), pp. 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Arnal, S. G. and Burwood, S. (2003) Tacit knowledge and public accounts, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(3), pp. 377–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Greatorex, J. and Bell, J. F. (2004) What makes marking reliable? Experiments with UK examinations, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), pp. 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, D. and Yorke, M. with Coffey, M. (2004) What is happening when we assess and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), pp. 451–477.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1996) Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education, 32, pp. 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain (New York: David McKay).
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. (2009) Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), pp. 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. and Price, M. (2013) External examining: fit for purpose, Studies in Higher Education. i-first. DOI 10.1080/03075079.2013.823931
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., Boyd, P. and Orr, S. (2011) Mark my words: the role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices, Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), pp. 655–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, P., Bourdillon, B., Collymore, D., Cooper, A., Fox, W., Haines, C., Turner, D., Woolf, H. and Yorke, M. (1999) Discipline-relayed marking behaviour using percentages: a potential cause of inequity in assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), pp. 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA). (2010) Qualification and Syllabus Structure (London: CIMA).
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, S. (2010) Facebook campaign against A-level exam paper, BBC Education Online. Available at http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8480563.stm (accessed 26 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2003) Re-embedding situatedness: the importance of power relations in learning theory, Organization Science, 14(3), pp. 283–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. (2001) ‘I know a 2:1 when I see it’: understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), pp. 301–313.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (1989) The International Encyclopaedia of Educational Technology, pp. 338–352 (London: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hand, L. and Clewes, D. (2000) Marking the difference: an investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. and Clark, T. (2006) Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice, Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), pp. 641–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, I. P., Joyce, J. and Hassall, T. (2009) Maintaining alignment in management education: the potential for drift in assessment, International Journal of Management Education, 7(2), pp. 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hussey, T. and Smith, P. (2008) Learning outcomes: a conceptual analysis, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, B. W. (1995) Assessment for learning: quality and taxonomies, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(2), pp. 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, K. K., Seaba, H. H., Welage, L. S., Scott, S. A., Rabi, S. M., Kelley, K. A. and Mason, H. L. (2012) Building a multi-institutional community of practice to foster assessment, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(4), pp. 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawitz, J. (2009) Learning in the academic workplace: the harmonization of the collective and individual habitus, Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), pp. 601–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw, A. (2012) ‘Tens of thousands’ affected by GCSE grade boundary changes say heads, Independent. Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/tens-of-thousands-affected-by-gcse-grade-boundary-changes-say-heads-8092539.html (accessed 28 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. and Lines, D. (2000) Understanding Assessment: Purposes, Perceptions, Practice. Key Issues in Teaching and Learning (London: Routledge/Falmer).
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, L. (2005) Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups, Journal of Management Review, 42(6), pp. 189–210.
   Google Scholar
• Lines, D. and Gammie, E. (2004) Assessment Methods Report (New York: IFAC).
   Google Scholar
• Mutch, A. (2003) Communities of practice and habitus: a critique, Organization Studies, 24(30), pp. 383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2005) Assessment standards: the role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), pp. 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) (2011) Chapter A6: assessment of intended learning outcomes, QAA. Amending Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education (2006). Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/Quality-Code-Chapter-A6.pdf (accessed 8 November 2012.12).
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) and the Higher Education Academy (HEA) (2013) External examiners’ understanding and use of academic standards. Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/External-Examiners-Report.pdf (accessed 16 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, N. and Angelina Wilson, A. (2012) Academic development in ‘assessment for learning’: the value of a concept and communities of assessment practice, International Journal for Academic Development, 17(1), pp. 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2006) Limits to communities of practice, Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), pp. 623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2007) Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria, Assessment in Education: Policy & Practice, 14(3), pp. 387–392.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2009) Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), pp. 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2013) Assuring academic achievement standards: from moderation to calibration, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), pp. 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. B. (2004) The assessment of complex performance: a socially situated interpretive act, Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), pp. 307–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, S. (2005) The assessment of complex tasks: a double reading, Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), pp. 663–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. and Bowcott, O. (2010) Thousands to lose jobs as universities prepare to cope with cuts, Guardian. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/feb/07/job-losses-universities-cuts (accessed 9 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, M. (2004) Equity, justice and standards: assessment decision making in higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), pp. 495–510.
   Google Scholar
• Watty, K., Freeman, M., Howieson, B., Hancock, P., O'Connell, B., de Lange, P. and Abraham, A. (2013) Assessment & evaluation in higher education social moderation, assessment and assuring standards for accounting graduates, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.848336. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Action, Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar