Exploring the Role of Symbolic Legitimation in Voluntary Journal List Adoption

References

• Adler, N., & Harzing, A. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. The Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2013). Business accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/2013-business/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Business Dean's Council (ABDC). (2013). ABDC journal quality list 2013. Retrieved from http://www.abdc.edu.au/pages/abdc-journal-quality-list-2013.html
   Google Scholar
• Barnabé, F. (2011). The role of journal rankings in evaluating research quality in the accounting field: Why and when they matter. Economia Aziendale Online, 2(1), 11–43.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., & Goodacre, A. (2006). A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance. Accounting and Business Research, 36(2), 65–91. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730011
   Google Scholar
• Beed, C., & Beed, C. (1996). Measuring the quality of academic journals: The case of economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(3), 369–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkaoui, A. (1980). The impact of socio-economic accounting statements on the investment decision: An empirical study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(3), 263–283. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90001-X
   Google Scholar
• Belkaoui, A. (1989). Accounting and language. Journal of Accounting Literature, 8, 281–292.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (1987). Accounting as a discipline for study and practice: 1986. Contemporary Accounting Research, 3(2), 338–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00642.x
   Google Scholar
• Bence, V., & Oppenheim, C. (2005). The evolution of the UK's research assessment exercise: Publications, performance and perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1080/00220620500211189
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J., & Brenner, V. (1974). Perceptions of journal quality. The Accounting Review, 49(2), 360–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuren, I., & de Souza, J. (2009). Analysis of the quality of international accounting journals: A Brazilian study. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 7(2), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 61–89). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, R., & Previtts, G. (1990). The sociology of accountancy: A study of academic and practice community schisms. Accounting Horizons, 4(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brinn, T., Jones, M., & Pendlebury, M. (1996). UK accountants’ perceptions of research journal quality. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 265–278. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729516
   Google Scholar
• Brinn, T., Jones, M., & Pendlebury, M. (2001). The impact of research assessment exercises on UK accounting and finance faculty. The British Accounting Review, 33(3), 333–355. doi: 10.1006/bare.2001.0164
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. (2010). The UK research assessment exercise: Performance measurement and resource allocation. 52(20)1, 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2011). Faculty focus: Exploring the number of faculty members by field/discipline. AASCB Blog. Retrieved from http://aacsbblogs.typepad.com/dataandresearch/2011/05/2010-11-salary-survey-new-hire-status.html
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. L., & Heufner, R. J. (1994). The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior faculty in leading U.S. MBA programs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 223–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00442.x
   Google Scholar
• Burbank, P., & Martins, D. (2010). Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: Divergent or synergistic? Nursing Philosophy, 11(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Chang, C., Tong, J., & Zhang, F. (2012). An analysis of the accounting and finance research productivity in Australia and New Zealand in 1991–2010. Accounting & Finance, 52(1), 249–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Chen, C., & Cheng, L. (2006). A ranking of accounting research output in the European region. Accounting and Business Research, 36(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730003
   Google Scholar
• Chua, W. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 59(4), 601–632.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, W., Raviv, T., & Richardson, A. (2010). Aggregating incomplete lists of journal rankings: An application to academic journals. Accounting Perspectives, 9(3), 217–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3838.2010.00011.x
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, S., Haensly, P., & Hodges, P. (2005). Acceptance rates and journal quality: A cross-disciplinary analysis of journals in accounting, economics, and finance. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 13(1), 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• DiRenzo, G. (Ed.) (1966). Concepts, theory and explanation in the behavioral sciences. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, A., & Weber, D. (2014). What influences accounting research? A citations-based analysis. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(1), 1–60. doi: 10.2308/iace-50603
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. (2009). Increasing their share of the research dollar: New Zealand's performance-based research fund. In T. Giberson & G. Giberson (Eds.), The knowledge economy and the commodification of higher education (pp. 101–113). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., Burritt, R., & Guthrie, J. (Eds.). (2011). Bridging the gap between academic accounting research and professional practice, accounting education at a crossroad in 2010. Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2010). Observations on the changing language of accounting. Accounting History, 15(4), 439–462. doi: 10.1177/1032373210373619
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, T. (1995). Accountant ethics: A brief examination of neglected sociological dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(2), 103–115. doi: 10.1007/BF00872015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the later modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, D. (2008). The interplay of conceptions of accounting and schools of thought in accounting history. Accounting History, 13(4), 479–509. doi: 10.1177/1032373208095480
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G. (2013). The future of academic research. Tuesday Plenary Speech at the American Accounting Association annual meeting, video available in AAA Commons for registered members. Retrieved from http://commons.aaahq.org/posts/42957603ce
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (2002). Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: An essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship. Accounting Forum, 26(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1111/1467-6303.00077
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, S. (2000). Accountants divided: Research selectivity and academic accounting labour in UK universities. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(5), 549–582. doi: 10.1006/cpac.1999.0405
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic journal quality guide. London: The Association of Business Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (2015). Academic journal quality guide. London: The Association of Business Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A. (2013, July 5). Journal quality list (50th ed.). 54th ed. Retrieved April 16, 2015, http://www.harzing.com
   Google Scholar
• Holderness, D. Jr., Myers, N., Summers, S., & Wood, D. (2014). Accounting education research: Ranking institutions and individual scholars. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(1), 87–115. doi: 10.2308/iace-50600
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. (2007). Wither accounting research? The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1365–1374. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. (2008). Changing pressures on the research process: On trying to research in an age when curiosity is not enough. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 87–96. doi: 10.1080/09638180701819998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T., & Nikolai, L. (1983). Attitude measurement and perceptions of accounting faculty publication outlets. The Accounting Review, 58(4), 765–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, R., & Wright, G. (1990). Faculty perceptions of journal quality: An update. Accounting Horizons, 4(1), 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S. (2015). Journal list fetishism and the ‘sign of 4’ in the ABS guide: A question of trust? Organization, 22(1), 119–138. doi: 10.1177/1350508413506763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. (1981). Misconceptions about the early land-grant colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(4), 333–350. doi: 10.2307/1981282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key Perspectives Ltd. (2009). A comparative review of research assessment regimes in five countries and the role of libraries in the research assessment processes (Report commissioned by OCLC Research). Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2009/2009-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F., & Harley, S. (1998). Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics. Capital & Class, 22(3), 23–51. doi: 10.1177/030981689806600103
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. (1963). The Morrill Act and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 12(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1080/00071005.1963.9973102
   Google Scholar
• Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 510–513. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (2009). Journal ranking articles published 1990–2009, by discipline. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Docs/Research/ranking-articles.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R. (1979). Bankers’ and auditors’ perceptions of the message communicated by the audit report. Journal of Accounting Research, 17(1), 99–122. doi: 10.2307/2490308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J., & Lowe, A. (2002). Problematising the construction of journal quality: An engagement with the mainstream. Accounting Forum, 26(1), 45–71. doi: 10.1111/1467-6303.00079
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2006). Constructing an ‘efficient frontier’ of accounting journal quality. The British Accounting Review, 38, 321–341. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2006.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., & McConatha, D. (2006). Hyper-symbolic interactionism: Prelude to a refurbished theory of symbolic interaction or just old wine? Sociological Viewpoints, 22, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• McGilvray, J. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, J., & Boekeloo, J. (1999). Two approaches to measuring journal quality: Application to finance journals. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(1), 30–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02752684
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, P. (1989). Words and the study of accounting history. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1108/09513578910132259
   Google Scholar
• Milne, M. (2000). Toward the end of academic freedom, diversity, judgement and accountability: A critique of Casser and Holmes’ (1999) journal yardsticks. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 6(1), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, M. (2002). The construction of journal quality: No engagement detected. Accounting Forum, 26(1), 72–86. doi: 10.1111/1467-6303.00080
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. (2009). The role of performance evaluation and management systems in the commodification of education. In T. Giberson & G. Giberson (Eds.), The knowledge economy and the commodification of higher education (pp. 41–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. (2012). Symbolic interactionism and moral hazards in higher education. Administrative Issues Journal, 2(2), 26–39. doi: 10.5929/2012.2.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Neimark, M. (1992). The hidden dimensions of annual reports: Sixty years of social conflict at general motors. New York: Markus Weiner Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Northcott, D., & Linacre, S. (2010). Producing spaces for academic discourse: The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality ratings. Australian Accounting Review, 20(1), 38–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (1994). Finding English words to talk about accounting concepts. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(2), 70–85. doi: 10.1108/09513579410058193
   Google Scholar
• Pascale, R., & Athos, A. (1981). The art of Japanese management: Applications for American executives. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, B. (1999). The power of words: Explaining recent accounting reforms in the Australian public sector. Accounting History, 4(2), 43–72. doi: 10.1177/103237329900400205
   Google Scholar
• Raabe, W., Kozub, R., & Sanders, D. (1987). Attitude measurement and the perceptions of tax accounting faculty publication outlets. Journal of Accounting Education, 5(1), 45–51. doi: 10.1016/0748-5751(87)90037-6
   Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O'Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy, 41(7), 1262–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013). The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face. Research Policy, 42, 1657–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Councils UK (RCUK). (2013). Impact report. Swindon: Polaris House. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/publications/2013Impactreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Research Excellence Framework. (2014). About the REF. Retrieved from http://www.ref.ac.uk/about/
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, B. (2011). Accounting research and accounting policy: What kind of gap? Accounting in Europe, 8(2), 141–154. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.621390
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1983). The word, the text and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. (2011). The ABS journal quality guide: A personal view. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 20(6), 575–580. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2011.621660
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. (1956). Culture, language and personality: Selected essays. (D. G. Mandelbaum, Ed.). Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Sorber, N. (2011). Farmers, scientists, and officers of industry: The formation and reformation of land-grant colleges in the Northeastern United States, 1862–1906. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Staley, D. (2013). Democratizing American higher education: The legacy of the Morrill Land Grant Act. Origins 6(4). Retrieved from http://origins.osu.edu/article/democratizing-american-higher-education-legacy-morrill-land-grant-act
   Google Scholar
• Stermersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21. doi: 10.2307/3003160
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2011). The assessment of research quality in UK universities: Peer review or metrics? British Journal of Management, 22(2), 202–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Commission. (2014). Performance-based research fund: Purpose. Retrieved from http://www.tec.govt.nz/Funding/Fund-finder/Performance-Based-Research-Fund-PBRF-/Purpose/
   Google Scholar
• Tilt, C. (2010). The impact of academic accounting research on professional practice. In E. Evans, R. Burritt, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Accounting education at a crossroad in 2010 (pp. 35–40). Sydney: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle, B., & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387–409. doi: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.4.387
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2014). The myth of rigorous accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 869–887. doi: 10.2308/acch-50880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. (1995). Managing the academics: Commodification and control in the development of university education in the U.K. Human Relations, 48(9), 993–1027. doi: 10.1177/001872679504800902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list festishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18(4), 429–442. doi: 10.1177/1350508411403532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M., & Higson, A. (1996). The interface of accounting research with education and practice. Accounting Education, 5(1), 35–42. doi: 10.1080/09639289600000004
   Google Scholar
• Worrell, D. (2009). Assessing business scholarship: The difficulties in moving beyond the rigor-relevance paradigm trap. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 127–130. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Hao, Q., & Yao, M. (2009). Rankings of academic journals in accounting, finance, and information systems: Perceptions from college chairpersons. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 17(1), 66–105. doi: 10.1108/18347640910967744
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. (1996). A study of academic research journals in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 10(3), 158–177.
   Google Scholar