The effect of accounting question response formats on student performance

References

• AICPA. (2014). Maintaining the Relevance of the Uniform CPA Examination. Retrieved from http://www.aicpa.org/becomeacpa/cpaexam/nextexam/downloadabledocuments/maintainingtherelevanceoftheuniformcpaexaminationfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alcolado, J., & Mir, M. A. (2002). Extended-matching questions for finals. London: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 31–36. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250570
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W. E., & Johnston, C. (1999). The relationship between multiple choice and essay response questions in assessing economics understanding. Economic Record, 75(4), 348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1999.tb02571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bible, L., Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2008). Using multiple choice tests to evaluate students’ understanding of accounting. Accounting Education, 17(S1), S55–S68. doi: 10.1080/09639280802009249
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., Lester, N. A., & Williams, E. (2010). Writing multiple-choice questions. Academic Psychiatry, 34(4), 310–316. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Worth, M., & Boylan, D. (2017). Improving critical thinking skills: Augmented feedback and post-exam debate. Business Education & Accreditation, 9(2), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, V. L., & Cashin, W. E. (1986). Improving multiple choice tests. IDEA Paper No. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2002). There’s no confidence in multiple choice testing. Proceedings of 6th annual computer aided assessment (CAA) conference, Loughborough: Loughborough University, July 9.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R. (1994). Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple choice and constructed-response test formats. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1994.9943836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder, W. W., & Mills, C. N. (2001). Pencils down, computer up-the new CPA exam. Journal of Accountancy, 191(3), 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. W., & Howard, T. P. (1998). The association between course objectives and grading methods in introductory accounting courses. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(4), 815–832.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. E., & Walstad, W. B. (1997). Combining multiple choice and constructed-response test scores: An economist’s view. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(4), 359–375. doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1004_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S., Davies, D., & Gupta, J. K. (2001). Formative self-assessment using multiple true-false questions on the Internet: Feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 158–163. doi: 10.1080/01421590031075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuechler, W. L., & Simkin, M. G. (2003). How well do multiple choice tests evaluate student understanding in computer programming classes? Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(4), 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Kuechler, W. L., & Simkin, M. G. (2010). Why is performance on multiple-choice tests and constructed-response tests not more closely related? Theory and an empirical test. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00243.x
   Google Scholar
• Lukhele, R., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1994). On the relative value of multiple-choice, constructed response, and examinee-selected items on two achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(3), 234–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1993). Trait equivalence as construct validity of score interpretation across multiple methods of measurement. In R. E. Bennett, & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construct versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 61–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rebello, N. S., & Zollman, D. A. (2004). The effect of distracters on student performance on the force concept inventory. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 116–125. doi: 10.1119/1.1629091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453–472. doi: 10.1023/A:1003196224280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkin, M. G., Keuchler, W. E., Savage, A., & Stiver, D. (2011). Why use multiple choice questions on accounting certification examinations? Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 8, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00053.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 940–953. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, A. (2003). The new CPA exam – meeting today’s challenges. Journal of Accountancy, 196(6), 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, C. W., & Borthick, A. F. (2004). Business simulation to stage critical thinking in introductory accounting: Rationale, design, and implementation. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(3), 277–303. doi: 10.2308/iace.2004.19.3.277
   Google Scholar
• Stice, J., & Stice, E. (2012). Intermediate accounting. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Stovall, D. (2013). Assessment formats in accounting: The used and abused. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 18(2), 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M., Knierim, A., Hayes, S. K., & Ware, J. (2006). The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments. Nurse Education in Practice, 6(6), 354–363. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsui, J. S., Lau, T. S., & Fong, S. C. (1995). Analysis of accounting students’ performance on multiple-choice examination questions: A cognitive style prespective. Accounting Education, 4(4), 351–357. doi: 10.1080/09639289500000039
   Google Scholar
• Walstad, W. B., & Becker, W. E. (1994). Achievement differences on multiple choice and essay tests in economics. The American Economic Review, 84(2),193–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J. N., & Derenne, A. (2011). Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple choice methods. The Journal of General Psychology, 138(4), 300–318. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2011.606442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2014, February 26). Examining your multiple choice questions [Blog Post]. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/examining-multiple-choice-questions/.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M. (1987). Essay versus multiple choice type classroom exams: The student’s perspective. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 352–358. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1987.10885782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (2003). A new look at the influence of guessing on the reliability of multiple choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(5), 357–371. doi: 10.1177/0146621603254799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar