Development and application of assessment standards to advanced written assignments

References

• AACSB White Paper No. 3 issued by: AACSB International Accreditation Coordinating Committee. (2007). AACSB International Accreditation Quality Committee, 20 November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2005). My instructor made me do it: Task characteristics of procrastination. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1177/0273475304273842
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48, 12–19. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOL Handbook. (2011) (version18.5.2011). Assurance of learning for the curricula of the degree programs in economics and business administration. Helsinki: Aalto University School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K. M., & Warfield, T. D. (2002). Outcome assessment of a writing-skill improvement initiative: Results and methodological implications. Issues in Accounting Education, 17(2), 123–148. doi: 10.2308/iace.2002.17.2.123
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/096392897331587
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 8(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1080/0729436890080102
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 73–85. doi: 10.1080/0729436930120107
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1995). Assessing for learning: Some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Suffolk: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. M. (1957). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing students learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business research methods (10th ed.). Singapore: McGraw – Hill International edition.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Daff, L., de Lange, P., & Jackling, B. (2012). A comparison of generic skills and emotional intelligence in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(3), 627–645. doi: 10.2308/iace-50145
   Google Scholar
• Dale-Jones, G., Hancock, P., & Willey, K. (2013). Accounting students in an Australian university improve their writing: But how did it happen? Accounting Education, An International Journal, 22(6), 544–562. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.847321
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347–360. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2014). Learning styles and approaches. Chapter 8 in The Routledge Company to Accounting Education (Edited by Richard M.S. Wilson), 163–188.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183–214. doi: 10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183
   Google Scholar
• English, L., Bonanno, H., Ihnatko, T., Webb, C., & Jones, J. (1999). Learning through writing in a first-year accounting course. Journal of Accounting Education, 17(2/3), 221–254. doi: 10.1016/S0748-5751(99)00012-3
   Google Scholar
• French, E., Summers, J., Kinash, S., Lawson, R., Taylor, T., Herbert, J., … Hall, C. (2014). The practice of quality in assuring learning in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 20(1), 24–43. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2014.889432
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, H. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education, An International Journal, 13(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306837
   Google Scholar
• Haycock, L. A., McCarthy, P., & Skay, C. L. (1998). Procrastination in college students: The role of self-efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76(summer), 317–324. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1998.tb02548.x
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 297–313. doi: 10.3102/00346543059003297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, T., & Carton, J. S. (1999). The effects of locus of control and task difficulty on procrastination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(4), 436–442. doi: 10.1080/00221329909595557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. C. (2014). Determinants of students’ performance in accounting programmes. Chapter 20 in the Routledge Companion to Accounting Education (Edt. Richard M.S. Wilson), 449–468.
   Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improve self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, D., & Crosser, R. (1990). The ‘writing-across-the-curriculum’ concept in accounting and tax courses. Journal of Education for Business, 66(2), 83–87. doi: 10.1080/08832323.1990.10535613
   Google Scholar
• Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Learning & teaching in higher education: The reflective professional. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (Eds.). (2009). Yliopisto-opettajan käsikirja. Helsinki: WSOYpro Oy. (Translation: The handbook of the university teacher).
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Approaches to learning in accounting education. Accounting Education, 13(4), 399–407. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306783
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2014). Perceptions of accounting. Chapter 6 in the Routledge Companion to Accounting Education (Edt. Richard M.S. Wilson), 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning: Are business schools making the grade? Journal of Education for Business, 82(4), 189–195. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.82.4.189-195
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning–II outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62, 229–258. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullola, S., Hintsanen, M., Jokela, M., Lipsanen, J., Alatupa, S., Ravala, N., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2014). Associations between teacher-rated versus self-rated student temperament and school achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 147–172. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.725094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
   Google Scholar
• Popham, J. (1997). What’s wrong and what’s right with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, C., & Michel, M. (2007). Assessment practices in AACSB-accredited business schools. Journal of Education for Business, 82(4), 202–211. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.82.4.202-211
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi: 10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Ramburuth, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Exploring the relationship between students’ orientations to learning, the structure of students’ learning outcomes and subsequent academic performance. Accounting Education, 13(4), 507–527. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306774
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411–427. doi: 10.1007/BF01680529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275–286. doi: 10.1080/03075078712331378062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15(8), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, T. J., & Simons, K. A. (2013). Writing in the accounting curriculum: A review of the literature with conclusions for implementation and future research. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(4), 823–871. doi: 10.2308/iace-50491
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, D. A., Riordan, M. P., & Sullivan, M. C. (2000). Writing across the accounting curriculum: An experiment. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 49–59. doi: 10.1177/108056990006300305
   Google Scholar
• Rotenstein, A., Davis, H. Z., & Tatum, L. (2009). Early birds versus just-in-timers: The effect of procrastination on academic performance of accounting students. Journal of Accounting Education, 27, 223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1989). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489–493. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddler, C. D., & Buley, J. (1999). Predictors of academic procrastination in college students. Psychological Reports, 84, 686–688. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.2.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R. F., Javalgi, R. G., Bryant, M., & Tukel, O. (2005). Challenges of AACSB International Accreditation for Business Schools in the United States and Europe. Thunderbird International Business Review, 47(6), 651–669. doi: 10.1002/tie.20074
   Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on student’s learning approaches. Multiple Choice Question Examination Versus Assignment Essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472. doi: 10.1023/A:1003196224280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senecal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and academic procrastination. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(5), 607–619. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9712234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, L. A., Ferguson, J., & Power, D. M. (2014). The use of teaching resources in accounting education. Chapter 19 in the Routledge Companion to Accounting Education (Edt. Richard M.S. Wilson), 420–446.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P., & Bain, J. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessments. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi: 10.3102/00346543045001089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1982). Limits of theory and practice in student attrition. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(6), 687–700. doi: 10.1080/00221546.1982.11780504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Baskerville, R. (2013). The experience of deep learning by accounting students. Accounting Education, An International Journal, 22(6), 582–604. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.847323
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (1998). Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning outcomes differ? Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 173–189. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. doi: 10.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar