E-learning in accounting education: the influence of students’ characteristics on their engagement and performance

References

• Abeysekera, I. (2008). Preferred learning methods: Comparisons between international and domestic accounting students. Accounting Education, 17(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280701220236
   Google Scholar
• AcademySmart. (2016). What is E-Learning for in Ukraine? https://academysmart.com.ua/what_is_e-learning_for_in_ukraine?language=en
   Google Scholar
• Aljawarneh, S. A. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, M. S. (2006). International students in English-speaking universities. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240906065589
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton, M., Shah, M., Vazquez, J., Griffiths, Z., Jackson, B., & Burgess, C. (2017). Using learning analytics to assess student engagement and academic outcomes in open access enabling programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1309646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, G., & Coetzee, D. (2013). Predicting student retention in massive open on-line courses using hidden Markov models. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2013/EECS-2013-109.html. Accessed 30 August 2019
   Google Scholar
• Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basioudis, I. G., & De Lange, P. (2009). An assessment of the learning benefits of using a web-based learning environment. Advances in Accounting, 25(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Basioudis, I. G., De Lange, P., Suwardy, T., & Wells, P. (2012). Accounting students’ perceptions of a learning Management system: An international comparison. Accounting Research Journal, 25(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/10309611211287279
   Google Scholar
• Bierówka, J. (2016). Opinie studentów ukraińskich na temat ich integracji akademickiej. Państwo i Społeczeństwo, 1, 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Bonafini, F. C., Chae, C., Park, E., & Jablokow, K. W. (2017). How much does student engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC affect their achievement? Online Learning, 21(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, N., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). Student differences in regulation strategies and their use of learning resources: Implications for educational design. In Proceedings of the Sixth international Conference on learning Analytics & knowledge (pp. 344–353). New York: ACM.25-29 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Horrocks, S., & Smith, J. (2002). Developing Classroom Practices to support NESB students in information systems courses: Some Preliminary findings. International Education Journal, 3(4), 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, C. G., Buccapatnam, S., Chiang, M., & Poor, H. V. (2016). Mining MOOC clickstreams: On the relationship between learner video-watching behavior and performance. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 64(14), 3677–3692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.2546228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.2190/H7E1-XMM7-GU9B-3HWR
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Ukraine. (2018). What you need to know. http://bunews.com.ua/society/item/ukraine-in-poland-ukrainian-students-flock-to-polish-universities-in-record-numbers
   Google Scholar
• Butz, N. T., & Askim-Lovseth, M. K. (2015). Oral communication skills assessment in a synchronous hybrid MBA programme: Does attending face-to-face matter for US and international students? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.940577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-S., Liu, E. Z.-F., Sung, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Chen, N.-S., & Cheng, S.-S. (2014). Effects of on-line college student's internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.771429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. Traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, C., Wells, P., Fieger, P., & Sharma, D. S. (2020). An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing. Accounting & Finance, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocea, M., & Weibelzahl, S. (2011). Disengagement detection in on-line learning: Validation studies and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S., Paquette, L., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Baker, R. S. (2016). Combining clickstream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion. In Proceedings of the Sixth international Conference on learning Analytics & knowledge (pp. 6–14). New York: ACM.25-29 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dabaj, F. (2009). The role of gender and age on students’ perceptions towards on-line education. Case study: Sakarya university, vocational high school. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Długosz, P. (2014). System edukacji i studia wyższe w opinii młodzieży pogranicza polsko-ukraińskiego. In E. Draus & P. Trefler (Eds.), Polska i Ukraina w dobie transformacji systemowej. Współpraca transgraniczna, innowacje, edukacja i rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy (pp. 142–161). Wydawnictwo: Pro Carpatia.
   Google Scholar
• Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edumadze, K. K. E., Ogoe, J. I., Essilfie, G., Edumadze, G. E., Osei-Gyasi, A., & Graham, R. E. (2017). E-learning at the university of Cape Coast, Ghana - are our distance education students technologically ready? The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 5(1), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). ‘Distance education’ and ‘e-learning': Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49(4), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-0040-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C., & Conway, K. (2015). Prior on-line course experience and G.P.A. As predictors of subsequent on-line {STEM} course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hechanova-Alampay, R., Beehr, T. A., Christiansen, N. D., & Van Horn, R. K. (2002). Adjustment and strain among domestic and international student sojourners: A longitudinal study. School Psychology International, 23(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302234007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2020). Hofstede insights. Country comparison. Poland and Ukraine. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/poland,ukraine/
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2011). Kultury i organizacje. Zaprogramowanie umysłu, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
   Google Scholar
• Huon, H., Spehar, B., Adam, P., & Rifkin, W. (2007). Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students. Higher Education, 53(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1727-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. T., & Chen, C. C. (2008). Blended-learning in a graduate accounting course: Student satisfaction and course design issues. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 18, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2019). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2018). Technology as a double-Edged Sword: From behavior Prediction with UTAUT to students’ outcomes considering personal characteristics. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 63–102. https://doi.org/10.28945/4022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning: The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.28945/1994
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. D., & Ruby, R. Jr. (1999). Learning style and adjustment issues of international students. Journal of Education for Business, 74(6), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329909601712
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Baker, R. (2018). The different relationships between engagement and outcomes across participant subgroups in massive open On-line courses. Computers & Education, 127, 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Kidzinski, L., Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). How do in-video interactions reflect perceived video difficulty? In Proceedings of the 3rd European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2015 (pp. 112–121). P.A.U. Education.18-20 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Chang, Y. F. (2010). Gender differences in usage, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and performance of blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), E39–E43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, K., & Oryshchyn, L. (2016). Transformacje społeczne a oczekiwania przyszłościowe młodych Polaków i Ukraińców. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin - Polonia. Sectio J, XXIX(1), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2016.29.1.263
   Google Scholar
• Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in on-line courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Mutahi, J., Kinai, A., Bore, N., Diriye, A., & Weldemariam, K. (2017). Studying engagement and performance with learning technology in an African classroom. In Proceedings of Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 148–152), Vancouver.13-17 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. S., & Hartley, J. (1986). What factors contribute to good examination marks? The role of notetaking in subsequent examination performance. Higher Education, 15(3-4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing E-learning and blended learning in relation to learning Outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K., & Scutter, S. (2010). Podcasting of health sciences lectures: Benefits for students from a non-English speaking background. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Tsai, C. C., & Wu, Y. T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the internet. Educational Studies, 32(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500416025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, B. M., & Johnston, C. G. (2006). The effect of interactive on-line learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, S., Barker, M., & Jones, E. (1999). Academic adjustment and learning processes: A comparison of international and local students in first-year university. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180110
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., Ine, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360050020499
   Google Scholar
• Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an Inclusive Definition of E-learning: An approach to the Conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkodie-Mensah, K. (1998). International students in the US: Trends, cultural adjustments, and solutions for a better experience. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprynska, Z., Tychmanowicz, A., & Filipiak, S. (2019). Kto jest szczęśliwszy? Optymizm, wartości i satysfakcja z życia studentów polskich i ukraińskich. Czasopismo Psychologiczne – Psychological Journal, 25(1), 69–77. http://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.25.1.69
   Google Scholar
• Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Study in Poland. (2018). Foreign students in Poland. http://www.studyinpoland.pl/en/index.php/news/77-foreign-students-in-poland-2017
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and their on-line classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(10), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/106689201753235930
   Google Scholar
• Suwardy, T., & De Lange, P. A. (1998). Delivery of accounting subjects via the internet: Student perceptions. Accounting Research Journal, 11(1), 327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R., Klass, P. H., & Fulk, B. M. (2012). Comparing on-line and face-to-face presentation of course content in an introductory special education course. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 35(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412441627
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of technology: U.S. Vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, P. K., Fieger, P., & De Lange, P. A. (2008). Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second year accounting course: Determinants of overall student perception. Accounting and Finance, 48(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieling, M. B., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2010). The impact of on-line video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54(4), 992–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of on-line lecture recordings on student performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ internet attitudes and internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiaojing, L., Shijuan, L., Seung-hee, L., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural differences in Online learning: International student perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-Regulated Online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C.-M., Kuh, G. D., & Carini, R. M. (2005). A comparison of international students and American student engagement in effective educational practices. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar