The teaching hand in remote accounting education: bringing mirror neurons into the debate

References

• Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., & Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 348–353. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 101, 150–167. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2014). Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks. Learning and Instruction, 34, 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2015). Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness. Computers & Education, 85, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., Wong, M., Adesope, O. O., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2019). Gender imbalance in instructional dynamic versus static visualizations: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 361–387. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09469-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., Marcus, N., Brucker, B., & Ayres, P. (2019). Does observing hand actions in animations and static graphics differentially affect learning of hand-manipulative tasks? Computers & Education, 141, 103636–103612. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 501–521. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9173-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Effects of observing the instructor draw diagrams on learning from multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 528–546. doi:10.1037/edu0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., Stull, A., Kuhlmann, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Instructor presence in video lectures: The role of dynamic drawings, Eye contact, and instructor visibility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1162–1171. doi:10.1037/edu0000325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty, T. J. (2020). Accounting education in the post-COVID world: Looking into the mirror of erised. Accounting Education, 29(6), 563–571. doi:10.1080/09639284.2020.1852945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues (pp. 1–99). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K. (1989). Accounting for failure: Participation and non-participation in CMC. In R. Mason, & A. A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 189–192). Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. (2017). Reflexivity in accounting research. In Z. Hoque, L. D. Parker, & M. A. Covaleski (Eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods (pp. 284–297). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison, T. E., & Bolliger, D. U. (2020). Student perceptions of connectedness in online graduate business programs. Journal of Education for Business, 95(5), 275–287. doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1643698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBarbera, R. (2013). The relationship between students’ perceived sense of connectedness to the instructor and satisfaction in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(4), 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, S. (1999). Reducing isolation for distance students: An On-line initiative. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 14(3), 14–23. doi:10.1080/0268051990140304
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185–204. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., Cleary, B., Wong, A., & Ayres P. (2013). Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations? Computers in Human Behavior. 29(6), 2172–2178. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinoni, G., van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world. International Association of Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed (pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014c). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed (pp. 345–368). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for Reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial Contiguity, and temporal Contiguity Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed (pp. 279–315). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-Neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20(8), 750–756. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ose Askvik, E., van der Weel, F. R., & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2020). The importance of cursive handwriting over typewriting for learning in the classroom: A high-density EEG study of 12-year-old children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1810), 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5-6), 419–421. doi:10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sangster, A., Stoner, G., & Flood, B. (2020). Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), 431–562. doi:10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., & Traxler, A. L. (2017). Humanizing instructional videos in physics: When less is more. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 269–278. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9677-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2002). Making differences: A Table of learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 34(6), 36–44. doi:10.1080/00091380209605567
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T. (2014). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 263–278). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 21–30. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9094-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Smith, L., Cooper, G., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior. 25(2), 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar