PACE-IT: designing blended learning for accounting education in the challenging context of a global pandemic

References

• Abbott, J. I., & Palatnik, B. R. (2018). Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: Implications for instructors. Accounting Education, 27(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1381032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon report. 2017 Higher Education edition.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolou, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M., & Rebele, J. E. (2017). Analysis of trends in the accounting education literature (1997–2016). Journal of Accounting Education, 41, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Apostolou, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M., & Watson, S. F. (2013). Accounting education literature review (2010-2012). Journal of Accounting Education, 31(2), 107–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Apostolou, B., Hassell, J. M., Rebele, J. E., & Watson, S. F. (2010). Accounting education literature review (2006-2009). Journal of Accounting Education, 28(3), 145–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2011.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, B. K., Ezzell, W. F., Murphy, L. A., Rayburn, J. D., Stith, M. T., & Strawser, J. R. (2012). The Pathways Commission on accounting higher education: Charting a national strategy for the next generation of accountants (executive summary). Issues in Accounting Education, 27(3), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-10300
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first century self-determined learners. In B. G. Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 25–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Smith, G. S. (1998). Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(2), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00012-8
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, S. M., & Hunton, J. E. (2000). The use of technology in the delivery of instruction: Implications for accounting educators and education researchers. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 129–162. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2000.15.1.129
   Google Scholar
• Coovadia, H., & Ackermann, C. (2021). Integrating digital pedagogies into a typical student learning lifecycle and its effect on exam performance. Accounting Education, 30(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1811993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, B. (2014). The case for change in accounting education. In R. M. S. Wilson (Ed.), The Routledge companion to accounting education (pp. 81–101). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Crosby, M., Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2005). Qualitative and quizitive research methods for describing online learning. In S. R. Hiltz, & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 95–112). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. (2020). Bridging practice and theory: The emerging potential of design-based research (DBR) for digital innovation in education. Education Research and Perspectives, 47, 157–173. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.825012086560112.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482900010102
   Google Scholar
• Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From Andragogy to heutagogy. UltiBASE Articles, 5, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1701
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
   Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., & De Lange, P. (2009). Do accounting graduates’ skills meet the expectations of employers? A matter of convergence or divergence. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(4–5), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902719341
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In C. M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, & J. Karat (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 98: Human factors in computing systems (pp. 187–194). Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428478
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, O. (2020). Designing blended learning for Accounting in tertiary education: The PACE-IT model. Unpublished PhD thesis. NUI Galway, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: Challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.182
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Laumakis, M., Graham, C., & Dziuban, C. (2009). The Sloan-C pillars and boundary objects as a framework for evaluating blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1679
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. EDUCAUSE Review, 37(1), 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1930). The child and his behavior. In Ape, primitive man, and child: Essays in the history of behaviour (E. Rossiter, trans.). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, P., & Lau, A. (2008). The use of on-line summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. In D. F. Halpern, & M. D. Hakel (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond (Vol. 89, pp. 55–71). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p10
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
   Google Scholar
• National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. (2020). Reflecting and learning: The move to remote/online teaching and learning in Irish higher education. https://www.teachingandlearning.ie/wp-content/uploads/NF-2020-Reflecting-and-Learning-web-ready.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pathways Commission. (2014). Implementing the recommendations of the Pathways Commission: Year two. http://commons.aaahq.org/
   Google Scholar
• Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 11–50). Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
   Google Scholar
• Rebele, J. E., & St. Pierre, E. K. (2015). Stagnation in accounting education research. Journal of Accounting Education, 33(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2015.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating (Issue 3rd edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., Stoner, G., & Flood, B. (2020). Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), 431–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/174809.174813
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., Jackson, S. L., Klein, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S. J., & Studer, S. (1996). Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learner-centered design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238476
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, L. A. (2000). Vicarious interaction: A learning theory for computer-mediated communications. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–92). Harvard Universtiy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. M. S., Ravenscroft, S. P., Rebele, J. E., & St. Pierre, K. (2008). The case for accounting education research. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802196202
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar