Framework for improvement of farmland biodiversity in Japan

References

• Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, National Institutefor Agro-Environmental Sciences and National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences 2012. Indicator Animals of Functional Agrobiodiversity: A Survey and Evaluation Manual. I. Survey and Evaluation Methods. 65pp., II. Background and Indicator Biology. 56pp. (http://www.niaes.affrc.go.jp/techdoc/shihyo/) (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Bertke , E. , Klimek , S. and Burghard Wittig , B. 2008 . Developing result-oriented payment schemes for environmental services in grasslands: results from two case studies in North-western Germany . Biodiversity , 9 : 91 – 95 .
   Google Scholar
• Carvell , C. 2007 . Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins . Journal of applied ecology , 44 ( 1 ) : 29 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM (Commission of The European Communities) DG Agriculture . 2004 . Impact assessment of rural development schemes in view of post 2006 rural development policy. Final Report , Brussels : Submitted by EPEC .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper , T. , Hart , K. and Baldock , D. 2009 . Provision of public goods through agriculture in the European Union , Brussels : Institute for European Environmental Policy .
   Google Scholar
• Engel , S. , Pagiola , S. and Wunder , S. 2008 . Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues . Ecological economics , 65 ( 4 ) : 663 – 674 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer , F. 2000 . Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge , Durham and London : Duke University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hampicke , U. 2006 . Efficient conservation in Europe’s agricultural countryside: rational, methods and policy orientation . Outlook on agriculture , 35 ( 2 ) : 97 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemkes , R. J. , Farley , J. and Koliba , C. J. 2010 . Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision . Ecological economics , 69 ( 11 ) : 2069 – 2074 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn , D. and Sutherland , W. J. 2003 . How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? . Journal of applied ecology , 40 : 947 – 969 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn , D. 2001 . Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes . Nature , 413 ( 6857 ) : 723 – 725 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn , D. 2006 . Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries . Ecology letters , 9 ( 3 ) : 243 – 254 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAFF . 1999 . Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas Basic Act. Act No. 106 of July 16, 1999 Tokyo [online] Available from: http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?vm=&id=102 [Accessed 31 August 2012]
   Google Scholar
• MAFF . 2010 . FY2009 annual report on food, agriculture and rural areas in Japan , Japan : Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries .
   Google Scholar
• Matzdorf , B. and Lorenz , J. 2010 . How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-environmental measures? An empirical analysis in Germany . Land use policy , 27 ( 2 ) : 535 – 544 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzdorf , B. , Kaiser , T. and Rohner , M.-S. 2008 . Developing biodiversity indicator to design efficient agri-environmental schemes for extensively used grassland . Ecological indicators , 8 ( 3 ) : 256 – 269 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton , K. 1997 . “ Nature, culture and biodiversity ” . In Cross-cultural protection of nature and the environment , Edited by: Arler , F. and Svennevig , I. 71–81. Odense, Denmark : Odense University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa , K. and Sakai , O. 2007 . Yukinousanbutsu no ryutsu to marketing (Distribution and marketing of the organic agricultural products) , Japan : Nousan Gyoson Bunka Kyokai .
   Google Scholar
• Pascual , U. and Perrings , C. 2007 . Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes . Agriculture, ecosystems and environment , 121 ( 3 ) : 256 – 268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager , K. , Reed , M. and Scott , A. 2012 . Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale. Rethinking agri-environmental payments . Land use policy , 29 ( 1 ) : 244 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renting , H. 2009 . Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework . Journal of environmental management , 90 ( Supplement 2 ) : S112 – S123 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Council for National Organic Farming . 2010 . Suggestions for the agri-environmental direct payment program. Letter to the Minister of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (in Japanese) [online] Available from: http://ganbo.cocolog-nifty.com/tanbo/files/teigen2010.11.11.pdf [Accessed 13 September 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Soini , K. and Aakkula , J. 2007 . Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: the essence of local conceptions and constructions . Land use policy , 24 ( 2 ) : 311 – 321 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka , K. 2010 . Indicators for functional agro-biodiversity: outline of the research project . Japan Plant Protection Association , 64 : 600 – 604 .
   Google Scholar
• TEEB . 2010 . The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations , London : Earthscan .
   Google Scholar
• Yabe , M. 1991 . An evaluation of recreation benefit of urban residents – a CVM environment assessment, comprehensive analyses of multifuctionality , 47 – 62 . National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 1991: .
   Google Scholar
• Yabe , M. , Hayashi , T. and Nishimura , B. Consumer behavior for biodiversity conservation and price formation in agricultural products . The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) conference 2012 . 21 March 2012, Leipzig , , Germany
   Google Scholar
• Wittig , B. , Richter gen. Kemmermann , A. and Zacharias , D. 2006 . An indicator species approach for result-oriented subsidies of ecological services in grasslands – a study in Northwestern Germany . Biological conservation , 133 ( 2 ) : 186 – 197 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar