Integrating knowledge, interests and values through modelling in participatory processes: dimensions of legitimacy

References

• Adams, B. 2004. “Public Meetings and the Democratic Process.” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kodmany, K. 2001. “Bridging the Gap Between Technical and Local Knowledge: Tools for Promoting Community-Based Planning and Design.” Journal of Architectural & Planning Research 18 (2): 110–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press International.
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 2005. “Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications.” Society & Natural Resources 18: 17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. G., and P. Reed. 2009. “Public Participation in GIS: A New Method for Use in National Forest Planning.” Journal of Forest Science 55 (2): 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, M., Z. Lamb, and B. Threlkeld. 2005. “Mapping Indigenous Lands.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 619–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. “Evaluating Collaborative Natural Resource Management.” Society and Natural Resources 16: 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahinden, U., C. Querol, J. Jäger, and M. Nilsson. 2003. “Citizen Interaction with Computer Models.” In Participation in sustainability science, edited by B. Kasemir, C. C. Jaeger, and M. T. Gardner, 105–125. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, M., and O. Renn. 2011. “Participatory Approaches to Modelling for Improved Learning and Decision-Making in Natural Resource Governance: An Editorial.” Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Service, USDA. 1985. Draft EIS: Green Mountain National Forest Land & Resource Management Plan. Rutland VT: GMNF.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Service, USDA. 2002a. Implementing the Green Mountain National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan – A 15 year Retrospective. Rutland, VT: GMNF.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Service, USDA. 2002b. “Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the Green Mountain National Forest, Notice of Intent.” Federal Register 67 (85), May 2: 22043–22048.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Service, USDA. 2006a. “Green Mountain National Forest: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices A-G.” Rutland, VT: GMNF. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/greenmountain/landmanagement/planning/?cid=stelprdb5333217
   Google Scholar
• Forest Service, USDA. 2006b. “Record of Decision. Final Environmental Impact Statement to Accompany the Land and Resource Management Plan, Green Mountain National Forest. Eastern Region, Milwaukee, WI.” http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/greenmountain/htm/greenmountain/links/projects/docs/forest_plan/gm_record_of_decision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, E., H. Harp, C. Ginger, and A. Voinov. 2010. “Effectiveness of a Participatory Modeling Effort to Identify and Advance Community Water Resource Goals in St. Albans, Vermont.” Environmental Modelling and Software 25 (11): 1428–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight, D., and C. Ginger. 2000. “Trust and Understanding in Participatory Policy Analysis: The Case of the Vermont Forest Resource Advisory Council.” Policy Studies Journal 28 (4): 739–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2004. “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century.” Planning, Theory & Practice 5 (4): 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, D. C., and R. M. Alston. 1986. The Genesis of FORPLAN: A Historical and Analytical Review of Forest Service Planning Models. General Technical Report INT-214. Intermountain Research Station: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. S. 2009. “Public Participation and Perceptions of Watershed Modeling.” Society & Natural Resources 22: 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasemir, B., C. C. Jaeger, and M. T. Gardner, eds. 2003. Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, B., B. B. Bare, R. C. Field, and G. A. Bradley. 1991. “Natural Resource Land Management Planning Using Large-Scale Linear Programs: The USDA Forest Service Experience with FORPLAN.” Operations Research 39 (1): 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. 2004. “Public Expertise: A Foundation for Citizen Participation in Energy and Environmental Decisions.” In Communication and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making, edited by S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, and M. A. Elsenbeer, 83–98. Albany, NY: New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Mosely, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Korfmacher, K. S. 2001. “The Politics of Participation in Watershed Modeling.” Environmental Management 27 (2): 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. L., and D. A. Deagen. 2001. “Choosing Public Participation Methods for Natural Resources: A Context-Specific Guide.” Society and Natural Resources 14: 857–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. S., M. Hession, A. Rickard, M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen, and M. Kendall. 2002. “Air Quality Management in UK Local Authorities: Public Understanding And Participation.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 (4): 571–590.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, M. J, M. J. Stern, R. W. Malmsheimer, D. J. Blahna, L. K. Cerveny, and D. N. Seesholtz. 2011. “Environmental and Social Risks: Defensive National Environmental Policy Act in the US Forest Service.” Journal of Forestry 109 (1): 27--33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern Forest Lands Council. 1994. Finding Common Ground: Conserving the Northern Forest. Concord, NH: Northern Forest Lands Council.
   Google Scholar
• Page, C. 2006. “Forest Plan Pleases No One.” Burlington Free Press, March 23: A1.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. 2003. “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51: 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predmore, S. A., M. J. Stern, and M. J. Mortimer. 2011. “Constructing the Public: The Substantive Sieve and Personal Norms in U.S. Forest Service Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (3): 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, P., and G. Brown. 2003. “Values Suitability Analysis: A Methodology for Identifying and Integrating Public Perceptions of Ecosystem Values in Forest Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 (5): 643–658.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Discourse. Boston, MA: Kluwar Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, B. L., D. Wilson, M. Urban, and E. E. Herricks. 1999. “Interaction Between Scientists and Nonscientists in Community-Based Watershed Management: Emergence of the Concept of Stream Naturalization.” Environmental Management 24 (3): 297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabecoff, P. 1987. “Vermont Forest Plan Draws Praise.” New York Times, August 2: 32(1).
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. 2006. “Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 96 (3): 491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V. P., ed. 1995. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smeltzer, E. G. 2003. A Phosphorus Problem in St. Albans Bay: A Summary of Research Findings. Waterbury, VT: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. “Beyond Public Participation: Fairness in Natural Resource Decision Making.” Society and Natural Resources 14: 239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Albans Area Watershed Association. ND. “General Watershed Characteristics.” http://www.saintalbanswatershed.org/watershed.html [Accessed 24 July 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, T. A., and W. Ascher. 1997. “Public Involvement Methods in Natural Resource Policy Making: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Trade-Offs.” Policy Sciences 30: 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., and H. V. Fineberg, eds. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C. 1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. ND. “State & County QuickFacts.” http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/50/5061675.html [Accessed 26 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Lake Champlain. Office of Water, Science and Technology. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/nutrients/lakechamplain.cfm
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. “Watershed Models.” Ecosystems Research Division. http://www.epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/html/watershed_models.html
   Google Scholar
• Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 2007. “Vermont Watershed Initiative: Guidelines for Watershed Planning.” Department of Environmental Conservation. http://www.vtwaterquality.org/planning/docs/pl_planningguidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vermont Agency of Natural Resources and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 2002. “Lake Champlain Phosphorus TMDL.” Waterbury VT and Albany, NY. http://www.vtwaterquality.org/lakes/docs/lp_lctmdl-report.pdf#zoom=100
   Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. “Modelling with Stakeholders.” Environmental Modelling and Software 25 (11): 1268–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler, T., and S. Tuler. 1999. “Integrating Technical Analysis with Deliberation in Watershed Management Planning: Applying The National Research Council Approach.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (3): 530–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar